Based on the analysis of the extensive documentation provided, the key takeaways from this ongoing legal and financial struggle are:
1. Massive Financial Identity Theft (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
The scale of the fraud is far larger than initially suspected; in fact, it totals ₹37,05,32,498 (approx. 370.5 million rupees) across five assessment years. This account unravels ₹370 Million Fraud. It reveals how criminal elements have used Mahesh Pratap Singh’s PAN (GSWPS0850Q). They conducted unauthorised GST sales of over ₹24.18 Crore and, in addition, contractual business transactions of over ₹7.8 Crore.
2. Proven Administrative Failure
The Principal Director General of Income Tax (Amitav) rejected the victim’s appeal on 13/01/2026. He claimed that, moreover, the Department never received a police requisition. However, official records, in contrast, show a different story. Inspector Jitendra Kumar, in fact, sent a formal requisition to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Prayagraj on 04/07/2025. Consequently, this situation indicates a severe misrepresentation of facts in the Department’s internal reporting. Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud.
3. Ongoing Criminal Activity (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
Fraud continues unabated; moreover, records for Financial Year 2024-25 indicate that authorities have processed over ₹3.35 Crore in new unauthorised entries. Additionally, the victim has actively marked these entries as “Information is denied” on the compliance portal.
4. Blocked Police Investigation
Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud: The local police have stalled the probe (FIR 291/23). However, the Income Tax Department refuses to provide the source and destination bank account details linked to these transactions. Consequently, without this “money trail” data, law enforcement cannot identify or arrest the perpetrators behind the ₹370 million laundering scheme.
5. Victim’s Counter-Action (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
As of January 14, 2026, the victim has launched a formal counter-attack. Specifically, they filed a corruption grievance (CBODT/E/2026/0002314) against the Pr. DGIT. In addition, they submitted an RTI request (DGICI/R/E/26/00008) to unmask the officials responsible for the misleading appeal report.
Should I draft a high-priority update for the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur? It will cite this total fraud amount of ₹37.05 Crore to escalate the FIR investigation.
Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud: How the Income Tax Department Failed a Victim of Massive Fraud
In an era of digital transparency, Permanent Account Number (PAN) misuse is increasingly common. Specifically, financial criminals use it as a weapon to launder astronomical sums. However, a real tragedy occurs when institutions designed to protect the economy, unfortunately, ignore evidence. This evidence is often sitting, quite literally, on their own desks. The situation involving Mahesh Pratap Singh (PAN: GSWPS0850Q) is a clear case. This demonstrates how administrators deny responsibility in a massive financial crime. The crime totals over ₹370 Million. Unraveling this fraud remains a critical challenge.
The Genesis of the Fraud: A Stolen Identity
The ordeal began when Mahesh Pratap Singh discovered unknown entities misusing his PAN. They were claiming bogus House Rent Allowance (HRA) exemptions. These entities conducted massive unauthorised business transactions. Initially, authorities flagged a “Rent Received” entry of approximately 11.2 million rupees, but deeper investigations revealed a much darker reality. Criminal elements orchestrated the ₹370 Million fraud. They leveraged his identity across five assessment years. This allowed them to move a staggering cumulative total of 370,532,498 rupees.
For a law-abiding citizen, such a discovery is, indeed, life-altering. Consequently, Mr. Singh took the correct legal path: he registered a First Information Report (FIR No. 291/23) under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 66C and 66D of the IT Act at PS Kotwali Katra, Mirzapur, in November 2023.
The Disconnect: Internal Resolution vs. Criminal Justice (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
The Income Tax Department’s Directorate of Intelligence and Criminal Investigation (I&CI) officially acknowledged the misuse. Specifically, they stated, “Various individuals have misused the assessee’s PAN to claim bogus HRA exemptions.” However, they have not proposed any action against the assessee.
While this cleared Mr. Singh of personal tax liability, it did nothing to bring the criminals to justice. Furthermore, the victim’s primary request was for the Department to share the source and destination bank account details. This, in turn, would help the local police reactivate a stalled criminal probe. Without this “money trail” data, consequently, the police investigation into a nearly 371 million rupee laundering scheme cannot move forward. Notably, the Income Tax Department possesses this crucial information.
The Arbitrary Rejection by the Pr. DGIT (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
Mr. Singh filed an appeal against the incomplete resolution on CBODT/E/A/25/0003726, thereby escalating the core issue. Subsequently, on January 13, 2026, Amitav, Principal Director General of Income Tax (Pr. DGIT) closed the appeal, unfortunately making a remark that was arbitrary and non-factual.
The Pr. DGIT’s office claimed that the investigation agency or Police have never requisitioned any bank details in the case, according to the Director of Income Tax (I&CI) Lucknow. The agency or Police have not requested any information, leading to the victim’s grievance being rejected as “not factual.
The Smoking Gun: Proof of Police Requisition (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
The assertion that the police never asked for information is directly contradicted by official documentation provided by the Mirzapur Police:
- July 4, 2025: Inspector Jitendra Kumar sent a formal requisition. It was addressed to the Commissioner of Income Tax, 38 MG Marg, Civil Lines, Prayagraj. He specifically asked for the details of all accounts and transactions linked to PAN GSWPS0850Q.
- November 24, 2024 (Parcha 16): Police Case Diary entries confirm that a report was sent. It was sent to the Commissioner of Income Tax regarding these fraudulent accounts16.
- July 9, 2025 (Letter 32/2025/SPMZR/A/2025/60026): The Superintendent of Police (SP) Office Mirzapur documented that, consequently, correspondence was ongoing. They were in contact with the Income Tax Department Allahabad/Prayagraj regarding these fraudulent firms.
Despite these formal notices, the high-ranking office of the Pr. DGIT maintained that no such request existed18. This indicates a severe breakdown in internal communication or a deliberate attempt to ignore a massive fraud case.
The Astronomical Scale of the Crime (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
A detailed analysis of the Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS) records proves that the fraud is far larger than the 161.2 million rupees initially estimated by the police19.
| Category of Fraud | Cumulative Amount (INR) |
| GST Turnover (Ghost Business Activity) | 241,847,980 |
| Rent Received (Bogus HRA Claims) | 49,934,236 |
| Business Receipts (Unauthorized Contracts) | 78,107,342 |
| GRAND TOTAL | 370,532,498 |
In Assessment Year 2023-24 alone, the perpetrators conducted a staggering 221.5 million rupees in transactions. Despite Mr. Singh marking these entries as “Information is denied” on the compliance portal, the entries remain active in his records.
Fighting for Accountability: RTI and New Grievances (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
Refusing to be silenced, the victim initiated major legal actions on January 14, 2026:
- A New Grievance (CBODT/E/2026/0002314): Filed against the Pr. DGIT for providing misleading remarks, this is currently Under Process with Jyoti Kumari, Pr. DGIT (Admin & TPS).
- RTI Request (DGICI/R/E/26/00008): This application demands the internal “Note Sheets.” It also requests the identity of the officer in Lucknow. This officer provided the false information used to reject the previous appeal.
Conclusion: A Call for Institutional Integrity (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
When an individual’s identity is used to move 370 million rupees, it is a threat to national financial security. The Income Tax Department refused to assist the police. It dismissed a victim’s evidence. This suggests a lack of “zero tolerance” toward corruption. Justice for Mahesh Pratap Singh requires the immediate release of transaction data. This is necessary to provide to the Mirzapur Police to stop this ongoing criminal enterprise.
Based on the records of your grievances, appeals, and RTI requests, here are the application IDs. You will also find the contact details for the concerned public authorities.
1. Active Application Identifiers
- Corruption Grievance (Current):
CBODT/E/2026/0002314(Status: Under Process as of 14/01/2026)111. - RTI Application:
DGICI/R/E/26/00008(Status: Request Received as of 14/01/2026)222. - Closed Appeal (Contested):
CBODT/E/A/25/0003726(Closed on 13/01/2026)3333. - Initial Grievance:
DOPAT/E/2025/0010251(Closed on 05/12/2025)4444.
2. Concerned Income Tax Officials (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
| Office / Wing | Officer Name & Designation | Email Address | Mobile / Contact Number |
| Intelligence & Criminal Investigation (I&CI) | Amitav, Principal Director General (Pr. DGIT) 5555 | dgit.icinv@incometax.gov.in 6666 | 011-24363582 7777 |
| Administrative & Taxpayer Services (TPS) | Jyoti Kumari, Pr. DGIT (Admin & TPS) 888 | delhi.pdgit.admin.tps@incometax.gov.in 999 | 011-23412480 101010 |
| I&CI (Delhi Administrative) | Nodal Officer (RTI) 11 | aditadmin.ici.delhi@incometaxindia.gov.in 12 | 011-24363068 13 |
| I&CI (Lucknow Office) | Director of IT (I&CI), Lucknow 14141414 | (See Nodal Officer above) | (See I&CI New Delhi) |
| Prayagraj (Allahabad) Office | Commissioner of Income Tax 15151515 | No specific email provided in records | Address: 38 MG Marg, Civil Lines 16161616 |
3. Police Authorities (Mirzapur)
- Investigating Officer: Inspector Jitendra Kumar, PS Kotwali Katra, Mirzapur17171717.
- Supervising Office: Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur18181818.
- Official Email: so-katra.mi@up.gov.in19191919.
4. Web Links and Portals (Unraveling ₹370 Million Fraud)
- CPGRAMS (Central Grievance Portal): pgportal.gov.in
- RTI Online Portal: rtionline.gov.in
- Income Tax Compliance Portal: ais.insight.gov.in 20202020
- NSDL Surveillance Cell: surveillancecell@nsdl.com 21212121
Would you like me to draft a reminder for Pr. DGIT Jyoti Kumari specifically regarding the ₹37.05 Crore fraud amount discovered in your latest TIS analysis?
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.