Grievance Against Police for neglecting the court order passed by the civil judge junior division, which has caused significant distress and a sense of injustice among the affected parties.
The police’s failure to implement the court’s decision undermines the rule of law and raises serious concerns about accountability within the system.
This negligence not only delays the resolution of crucial matters but also erodes public trust in law enforcement agencies, highlighting a pressing need for oversight and corrective measures to ensure compliance with judicial mandates.
It is imperative that these issues are addressed promptly to restore faith in the legal process and uphold the authority of the court.

---

Allegations of Court Order Violation and Official Misconduct in Mirzapur Land Dispute

A series of grievances filed by Ashok Kumar Maurya highlight a worrying land dispute in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, reflecting a complex and multifaceted issue that has escalated over time.
The dispute involves alleged violations of a civil court order, which raises significant concerns about the integrity of the judicial system and the enforcement of its mandates.
It also concerns the inaction of a police officer, whose duty it is to uphold the law and protect the rights of citizens, but has seemingly failed to act on the serious allegations presented.
The complaints, which span from 2023 to January 2025, illustrate a continuous struggle for justice, as they focus on the alleged defiance of a court-issued provisional injunction against construction on a disputed plot of land, wherein the unlawful activities not only threaten the land rights of Mr. Maurya but also set a troubling precedent for how such matters are handled in the region.
This ongoing situation calls for urgent attention and resolution, as it undermines public trust in law enforcement and judicial authority, leaving individuals like Mr. Maurya vulnerable to the repercussions of overlooked legal rights.

The grievances detail a breakdown of the events:

The Civil Court Injunction

The initial grievance from May 27, 2023, references an order issued by a Civil Judge in Mirzapur, a situation that underlines the complexities often associated with local land disputes.
The order resulted in a provisional injunction, which is currently effective until a fixed date to ensure compliance and fairness.
Specifically, the order categorically forbids the respondent from proceeding with any construction activities on a plot of land (acreage 0.04200) located in Village Vihasda Khurd.
This injunction was granted to prevent the purpose of the litigation from being defeated, thereby protecting the interests of the parties involved.
It underscores the judicial system’s commitment to upholding legal standards and ensuring that any potential grievances are addressed without causing irreversible changes to the land in question.
The decision reflects the court’s careful consideration of the facts presented, revealing the intricate dynamics of legal proceedings in matters of property and construction.

Allegations Against Sub-Inspector Rajesh Pandey

New complaints filed in late 2024 and early 2025 allege that construction work was carried out on the land, raising serious concerns about compliance with existing legal mandates. This occurred despite a clear court order intended to halt any activity on the property, highlighting potential disregard for the authority of the judiciary.
The complaints specifically mention the digging of a foundation and the opening of a gate, activities that not only signify the commencement of construction but also pose a threat to the integrity of the disputed land. According to the grievances, the opposing party is responsible for these actions. They are named Pratibha Devi and Gunja Devi, who have been identified as sisters-in-law of Gulab Chand Maurya, a party involved in the ongoing litigation.
This family connection complicates the situation, suggesting that personal relationships may be influencing the legal proceedings and the enforcement of the court’s orders.

The core of the complaint is the accusation. It claims that Sub-Inspector Rajesh Pandey is a subordinate of the Station House Officer (SHO) of Jigna Police Station. He neglected to enforce the court’s order. The complainant states that he apprised sub-inspector repeatedly of the situation. He allegedly acted as a “mute spectator.” His inaction allowed the violations to occur. The complaint suggests a “mockery of the court order.” It also alleges a lack of integrity on the part of the sub-inspector.

Misleading Police Reports

The final grievance suggests that a report from the SHO of Jigna Police Station was “misleading.” It “misled the Superintendent of Police (SP) Mirzapur,” leading to serious implications for both public safety and police accountability.
The complainant, Ashok Kumar Maurya, argues that this report presented the station house officer’s viewpoint in a biased manner, failing to capture the complete picture of the situation on the ground. It downplayed or misrepresented the extent of the violations occurring within the community, thereby undermining the trust residents place in law enforcement.
The complainant gave the official action a poor rating, indicating a significant dissatisfaction with the handling of the complaints raised. Furthermore, the accompanying remarks in the grievance further reinforce this claim, laying out a detailed account of how police oversight was lacking and citing specific instances of negligence.
They directly link the encroachment to the alleged negligence of Sub-Inspector Rajesh Pandey, raising concerns about his performance and the overall effectiveness of the police in addressing such critical issues in Mirzapur.

---

What to Know

• Provisional Injunction: This is a temporary court order. It prevents a party from taking a certain action. This restraining effect lasts until a further order of the court.
• Civil Court Order Enforcement: Police and other local authorities are typically responsible for enforcing civil court orders. This includes injunctions. Their role is to uphold law and order.
• Grievance Redressal System: This case illustrates the use of a formal grievance system. It includes GOVUP/E/2025/0002668, GOVUP/E/2024/0096233, GOVUP/E/2023/0034257. The system helps in bringing a complaint to higher authorities. In this case, it is the Chief Minister Secretariat of Uttar Pradesh. The grievances forwarded to Shri Arcing Mohan, Joint Secretary.

This ongoing case highlights serious concerns regarding the enforcement of judicial directives. It also questions the accountability of local law enforcement officials in Mirzapur. This situation highlights potential challenges. Citizens face these challenges when they seek to protect their rights. They do so through the legal system and a formal grievance process.

Third complaint of Ashok Maurya overlooked by Jigna police