Key Takeaways

• Sadhana Mishra alleges land usurpation involving family members and officials in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, highlighting procedural misconduct.
• The complaint accuses Revenue Department officials of colluding to manipulate records and exclude rightful heirs from property listings.
• An F.I.R. is sought against involved parties under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for fraud and forgery.
• The case underscores significant procedural irregularities, including an arbitrary report from local authorities and a lack of action from police.
• Sadhana Mishra has escalated her fight for justice through multiple channels, including NHRC and UPHRC, demanding urgent investigation into the allegations of land usurpation.

A Fight for Justice: Allegations of Land Usurpation and Official Collusion in Mirzapur

The case of Sadhana Mishra (also identified as Sadhana Tiwari) highlights serious allegations of land usurpation and procedural misconduct involving her family members and officials within the Revenue Department in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. The applicant has formally lodged allegations of land usurpation with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and subsequently with the Uttar Pradesh government. These allegations detail a conspiracy aimed at unlawfully removing the applicant’s name from ancestral property records. This article breaks down the core issues, procedural irregularities, and the calls for legal action.

---

The Heart of the Complaint is Allegations of Land Usurpation: Property and Heirs

The dispute centers on ancestral land located in the village of Bhaisod Balay Pahad, Tappa Uparaudh, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Lalganj, Mirzapur.

Alleged Usurpation and Succession Fraud

The core claim is that certain individuals, primarily the applicant’s relatives, in collusion with staff from the Department of Revenue, manipulated official records. These staff include Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar of Lalganj Tehsil. Allegations of land usurpation against these individuals are serious and implicate both private and public parties.

• The Deceased Grandfather: The property originally belonged to Shambhu Saran Mishra (deceased).
• The Missing Heir: The complaint states that neither the applicant, who was a Class I heir at the time, nor the applicant’s father, who died five years before the grandfather, appears on the list of heirs or successors.
• The Sale: Records show that property transactions occurred (Sale Deed/Registration) based on a Na0 Tah0 Haliya case ($255/2007$ and $256/2007$) dated June 19, 2007. It cites Shambhu Saran Mishra’s purported heirs as sellers. The applicant alleges the father did not sell the properties and their exclusion from the heir list shows a conspiracy by the offenders to usurp the property.
• The Legal Question: The applicant vehemently questions the legal basis that allows individuals to cheat minors out of their ancestral property. This action directly contradicts constitutional and statutory protections regarding a minor’s right to inherited land.

---

Procedural Irregularities and Official Reports

The complaint highlights a critical lapse in integrity by public servants. This is specifically concerning a report submitted to the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) amidst allegations of land usurpation.

Arbitrary Report by the Circle Officer

The original complaint was filed with the UPHRC, which issued an order on September 5, 2024. It directed action or a report.

• The Response: The Circle Officer, Lalganj, submitted a report dated February 28, 2025.
• The Allegation: The applicant, Sadhana Mishra, describes this report as “arbitrary, inconsistent, and bogus.” It is alleged that the Circle Officer failed to review subsequent submissions and evidence provided by the applicant. This disregard of critical information shows a serious lapse in procedural diligence.
• Case Status: The NHRC has attached the complaint (Diary No. $4255/\text{in}/2025$) to an existing matter, Case No. $10035/24/55/2024$. They directed the applicant to use this number for all future correspondence.

---

Call for Action and Identified Offenders

The central demand of the applicant is the immediate registration of a First Information Report (F.I.R.) against the private and public staff involved in the alleged property fraud. This action is critical to address the allegations of land usurpation detailed in the complaint.

Criminal Sections Invoked

The F.I.R. is sought under the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which relate to fraud, forgery, and misuse of official documents:

• Sections: $466, 467, 468, 420, 195, \text{ and } 471$.

Details of the Alleged Offenders

Category	Name	Connection/Role
Private Individuals	Daya Shankar Mishra	S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra (Relative)
	Hari Prasad Mishra	S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra (Relative)
Public Staff (Lalganj Tehsil)	Lekhpal	Revenue Staff
	Revenue Inspector	Revenue Staff
	Tehsildar	Revenue Staff

The matter also concerns the functioning of the Station House Officer (SHO) at the Drummond Ganj Police Station, which plays a critical role in maintaining law and order within the jurisdiction.
This situation is currently under the close supervision of the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, due to significant concerns regarding the SHO’s failure to promptly initiate an F.I.R. in light of these serious allegations of land usurpation.
Such negligence not only undermines public trust in the local law enforcement but also raises questions about the integrity and effectiveness of the police force in addressing grievances raised by the community.
The local populace is increasingly demanding accountability and transparency in the actions of the SHO, as the inaction could potentially have far-reaching implications for the victims and the broader community.

---

Current Status of the Grievance

The complaint was also registered as a public grievance with the Uttar Pradesh government (Registration Number: GOVUP/E/2025/0089435) on August 6, 2025. It has since been forwarded to the Chief Minister Secretariat, with Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) named as the Officer Concerned to take necessary action.

The applicant’s persistent pursuit of justice through multiple channels—NHRC, UPHRC, and the state’s grievance system—underscores the gravity of the accusations. Allegations of land usurpation need urgent investigation. The case now awaits crucial action from the authorities in Uttar Pradesh. They need to investigate the alleged collusion, the manipulation of revenue records, and the claims of ancestral property usurpation.

UPHRC directed S.P. Mirzapur to act in accordance with law in matter of Sadhana

Sadhna Tiwari thanks to secretary of village panchayat