Introduction: Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption

Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption is a testament to her unwavering commitment to justice and transparency.
She has dedicated her life to exposing malpractices within government and corporations.
Through grassroots movements and public awareness campaigns, Sadhana inspires others to join her cause.
This fosters a collective effort to eradicate corruption.

Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption: Challenging Administrative Arbitrariness and Land Grabbing in Mirzapur

This post examines a critical grievance at the heart of Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption. Specifically, it covers a case filed before the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC). This case exposes alleged collusion between revenue officials and private individuals to usurp ancestral land. Furthermore, it addresses the local police’s failure to take appropriate action. Ultimately, Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption in Mirzapur raises pressing issues. It emphasizes the need to protect the rights of vulnerable sections — specifically women and children. They need protection against bureaucratic apathy and institutional misconduct in the world’s largest democracy.

---

The Genesis of Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption

Sadhana Tiwari filed the petition on June 26, 2025, with Diary Number 4255/IN/2025.
At its core, the case centres on a dispute over ancestral property in Mauja Bhaisod Balay Pahad.
The property is located in Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur.

The core issue involves land transactions and inheritance proceedings after the death of the applicant’s grandfather, Shambhu Sharan Mishra, in 2005. At that time, notably, the applicant was a 10-year-old minor. Specifically, she was a Class I Heir (the daughter of a deceased son). Furthermore, she claims that her father’s brothers (Dayashankar Mishra and Hariprasad Mishra) conspired with local revenue officials. These officials included the Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar of Lalganj. Allegedly, they altered revenue records, thereby resulting in the removal of the applicant’s name from the inheritance documents. Consequently, the relatives, as a result, took over the ancestral property.

Sadhana presents t**he revenue records cited in the petition** — Khatauni F. San 1413 to 1418F — and the subsequent transfer order (Vad Sankhya 255/2007) as evidence of this conspiracy.
These documents demonstrate that officials deliberately omitted her name.
They also omitted her deceased father’s name from the list of heirs and successors.

---

The Challenge to Police and Administrative Reports

Sadhana submitted the petition to the UPHRC after the Commission had already directed district authorities to investigate the matter.
Consequently, the current grievance directly challenges the resulting report, dated February 28, 2025.
This report was submitted by the Circle Officer (CO) of Lalganj, Mirzapur.

The applicant asserts that the CO’s report is “arbitrary, inconsistent, and bogus” because:

1. Lack of Perusal: The Circle Officer allegedly failed to properly examine the detailed submissions and supporting revenue documents. These were provided by Sadhana. This failure occurred despite the UPHRC’s clear directive to do so. (Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption)
2. Abuse of Power: The CO’s report arbitrarily downplays the severity of the alleged crimes. In doing so, it effectively shields the accused — including both private individuals and the government officials involved.
3. Failure to Register FIR: Sadhana’s primary demand is that authorities register a First Information Report (FIR) against the accused under serious sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) — including Sections 466, 467, 468, 420 (Cheating), 195, and 471 (Forgery and use of forged documents). However, instead of registering a criminal case, the police are treating the matter as a mere “land dispute.” They are directing Sadhana to seek other resolutions. Sadhana argues that manipulating inheritance records to cheat a minor out of her ancestral property constitutes a criminal offence under the IPC. This is not merely a simple land dispute. Therefore, authorities must address it under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Moreover, the police’s refusal to register the FIR represents a clear breakdown of law enforcement’s duty and a direct failure of transparency and accountability.

---

The Legal and Humanitarian Imperative (Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption)

The case raises critical questions about the rights of vulnerable sections in India:

1. Rights of the Child and Woman

The applicant, Sadhana Tiwari, was a minor when the property was usurped. The law, particularly the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, is clear on the rights of a Class I female heir (daughter of a predeceased son). The actions of the relatives, allegedly facilitated by revenue staff, exploited her vulnerability and immaturity.

The petition poignantly asks: “Whether the rights of women are safe in this largest democracy in the world?” and “What is the role of the police in case of cheating of the property by the relatives of a child?”

2. Criminal vs Civil Jurisprudence (Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption)

A central point of contention is the police’s attempt to sideline the matter to the civil court. In fact, the IPC explicitly covers cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy as criminal offences. Furthermore, when a public servant manipulates official documents — such as Khatauni or revenue records — for financial gain, it compounds the crime and can attract charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Importantly, the Supreme Court, in Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P., mandates that police must register an FIR whenever a cognizable offence comes to light.

3. Role of the U.P. Human Rights Commission (Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption)

The UPHRC carries the responsibility of protecting human rights — including the right to property, the right to a fair legal process, and protection against abuse of power by public servants. For this reason, the Commission’s intervention is crucial to:

• Ensure impartial investigation: Direct a credible and independent probe into the alleged collusion between the Tehsildar, Revenue Inspector, Lekhpal, and Sadhana’s relatives.
• Mandate FIR registration: Compel the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to register the FIR under the relevant IPC sections against all offenders.
• Establish Precedent: Set an “excellent precedent” to deter others from destroying the lives of vulnerable individuals through land grabbing and administrative corruption.

---

Conclusion: A Plea for Accountability

Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption is not just a plea for ancestral land — it is a profound call for systemic accountability. Indeed, Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption exposes the urgent need for public servants to answer for their actions and for the police to uphold the law impartially. The demand is straightforward: authorities must deliver justice through the due process of criminal law. In doing so, they must ensure that the rights of women and childrenare not mere theoretical safeguards but are actively protected by the institutions of governance. Ultimately, the UPHRC’s final ruling will be a defining moment — not only for Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption, but also as a testament to the strength of human rights safeguards against deeply entrenched corruption and arbitrary administrative action across Uttar Pradesh.

---

Follow Sadhana Tiwari’s fight against corruption and stay updated on the status of diary number 4255/IN/2025 before the UPHRC.

Sadhana Tiwari submitted a complaint against S.H.O. Drummond Ganj before UPHRC, highlighting serious concerns regarding the ongoing harassment faced by women and girls in the region. Stop harassing women and girls in the regime of Yogi Adityanath by the police to suppress voices; such actions undermine their fundamental rights and instill fear within the community. UPHRC directed S.P. Mirzapur to act in accordance with the law in the matter of Sadhana, emphasizing the importance of upholding justice and ensuring that all individuals feel safe to express their grievances without the threat of retaliation. This case signifies a critical moment for the rights of women, urging authorities to foster an environment of respect and protection.

Related Posts: Sadhana Tiwari’s Fight Against Corruption

• Sadhana Tiwari for Justice and Transparency Explained
• Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
• Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case: A Fight for Justice
• Unraveling Sadhana Tiwari Case: RTI Act Challenges
• UPHRC Order Process in Mirzapur Explained