Key Takeaways
- Naresh Kumar Jaiswal highlights issues with human rights transparency by struggling to access an investigation report from the UPHRC.
- He filed a formal objection due to the inability to obtain the report necessary for his legal proceedings.
- Jaiswal’s RTI application for administrative records received an unsatisfactory response, showcasing a lack of transparency.
- He seeks the UPHRC to enforce its order. He requests the report be provided to him within 7 days. Additionally, he asks for a 15-day extension for objections.
- The case underscores the necessity of transparency in the judicial process. It also emphasizes the fundamental right to be heard in human rights cases.
⚖️ The Right to Respond: A Citizen’s Fight for Openness in a Human Rights Matter
The ongoing struggle of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal epitomises the pressing need for human rights transparency within the judicial framework. His efforts to access a vital investigation report from the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) show significant barriers. These barriers hinder the pursuit of justice. By filing a formal objection, Jaiswal underscores the critical importance of transparency in legal proceedings. He also submitted a Right to Information (RTI) application. This highlights the broader implications for individuals seeking to assert their rights. This case illustrates the challenges citizens face in accessing necessary information. It also underscores the fundamental right to be heard in matters of human rights.
A Case of Non-Compliance and Denied Information
A citizen from Mirzapur is Naresh Kumar Jaiswal. He had no choice but to send a formal Objection/Representation to the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC). This is not against the findings of an investigation. It is against the sheer impossibility of accessing the report itself. This case highlights a critical issue with human rights transparency. Fundamental information necessary to join effectively in one’s own legal proceedings is denied. This denial undermines human rights transparency greatly.
The matter stems from a human rights complaint (Case No. 19235/24/55/2025) filed by Mr. Jaiswal on August 26, 2025, about an alleged ‘Abuse of Power’ involving the SHO, CHILH, Mirzapur.
The Investigation and The Crucial Direction in matter of Human Rights Transparency
The UPHRC addressed the first complaint by issuing a notice to the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur. They requested an Action Taken Report (ATR) to guarantee the necessary transparency in human rights issues.
On October 30, 2025, the Additional Superintendent of Police submitted an investigation report to the Commission. This report (जांच आख्या) was conducted by the Circle Officer, Sadar. Crucially, on this date, the Commission directed that the Applicant (Mr. Jaiswal) get a copy of the investigation report. It also set a deadline of December 18, 2025, for the applicant to send any objections.
The Problem: A Missing Report
As of November 9, 2025 (the date of his submission), Mr. Jaiswal stated that he had not received the copy of the ‘जांच आख्या’ as the UPHRC’s order directed. He argued that without this report, he can’t meet the December 18th deadline. He finds it impossible to offer a substantive, merit-based objection. This situation clearly violates the principles of natural justice. These principles need that they inform a party of the evidence against them before that party responds. Additionally, these principles mandate that authorities reveal the findings of a probe, which is essential for ensuring human rights transparency.
The Parallel RTI Struggle to make sure Human Rights Transparency
Mr. Jaiswal actively sought transparency beyond the Commission’s proceedings. He filed an RTI Application for administrative records related to the case. This action illustrates his commitment to human rights transparency.
The Public Information Officer (PIO) gave an unsatisfactory reply. This led to a First Appeal before the SSP, Mirzapur, on October 16, 2025. The PIO’s refusal was based on the legally questionable pretext that the investigation was “in progress.” This refusal to offer administrative records highlights a troubling pattern. The subsequent failure to deliver the full investigation report highlights the obstruction of information flow. It runs counter to the principles of human rights transparency.
Seeking Justice and an Extension
The primary goal of Mr. Jaiswal’s latest submission is not to argue the facts of the case. Instead, it is to demand the compliance of the authorities with the Commission’s own order.
He focuses and clarifies his prayers to the UPHRC.
- Condone his current inability to send a substantive objection due to non-receipt of the report.
- At once Direct the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to give a full copy of the Investigation Report (जांच आख्या). They must do this within 7 days. This will reinforce the importance of transparency in human rights proceedings.
- Grant an Extension of at least 15 days from the actual date of receipt of the report. This provides a fair opportunity to review the findings. It also allows time to file a comprehensive objection.
Conclusion
This representation serves as a strong reminder of the fundamental principles that underlie our justice system. Transparency and due process are the bedrock of any fair judicial or quasi-judicial system. These principles guarantee that every individual can fully understand the actions that affect their lives.
Officials prevent citizens from seeing findings, which denies them the ability to respond. This lack of access undermines their ability to defend themselves and erodes public trust in the mechanisms of justice. Mr. Jaiswal fights for the basic right to be, heard effectively, highlighting not just his personal struggle.
But also points to a broader societal issue where many feel voiceless. It shows the vital importance of transparency in human rights. This reminds us that equality before the law can’t exist without open and just processes for everyone involved.
We must safeguard every individual’s rights and respect these rights in the eyes of the law through these measures.
Whether victim and complainant has no right to obtain the report dated 02 July 2022
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.