In this matter, the concerned Lekhpal not only manipulated the revenue records but also crafted a complex network of deceit that ultimately led to the unlawful appropriation of public land meant for the villagers.
This public land was insidiously handed over to the muscle men of the village panchayat, Vihasara Khurd, who are known for using intimidation and coercive tactics to control local affairs.
Moreover, there is substantial circumstantial evidence of illegal gratification, indicating that the Lekhpal may have received financial incentives or bribes in exchange for facilitating this corrupt transfer, thereby undermining the integrity of the local governance system and harming the community’s trust in public officials.

🚨 Public Land Scam Exposed: The Case of Araji Number 164 in Mirzapur 🚨

A brazen public land scam exposed: an act of corruption and manipulation within the Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, has allegedly led to the illegal sale of non-agriculture government land to private individuals, significantly impacting local communities and their livelihoods.
This blog post details the case, presenting how the public land scam exposed corruption through alleged manipulation of revenue records and the various tactics employed by corrupt officials to exploit vulnerable populations.
It also highlights the urgent need for a transparent and accountable investigation, emphasizing that without strict measures in place to safeguard public land, such scandals will continue to erode trust in governmental institutions and hinder the development of the region.
The community’s call for justice underscores the necessity for systemic reforms that ensure complete transparency in land dealings and protect public resources from unscrupulous actors.

---

The Allegation of Public Land Scam Exposed:: Revenue Record Manipulation for Illegal Gain

The issue centers on a parcel of government land, which multiple Araji numbers (land plot numbers) have identified over time. Researchers uncovered intricate details where this public land scam has been exposed, revealing significant changes in the land’s identification as part of this manipulation.
These alterations were not merely administrative oversights; rather, they involved a coordinated effort to misrepresent ownership and usage rights. The investigation highlighted various stakeholders who benefited from these illicit activities, showcasing the complexities of land tenure and governance.
Moreover, it became evident that community members had been misled, often unaware of the true nature of the land’s allocation and the deceptive practices at play. This issue underscores the urgent need for transparency in land management and the protection of public resources from fraudulent schemes that undermine trust and equity in society.

• The Land’s Evolution: Allegedly, the developers modified the plot’s identity multiple times. They started with Araji number 175, then changed it to 183, then to 191, before finally renaming it to 164.
• The Bifurcation and Sale: The authorities reportedly bifurcated the non-agriculture government land, Araji number 164, into Araji number 164 K and Araji number 164 Kh. Lekhpal and other colluding staff within the Department of Revenue allegedly sold one of these subdivided plots to private parties, referred to as “muscle men.”
• The Sale Example: Documents suggest that individuals purchased Araji number 164 a (one of the bifurcated plots), including Ramraj / Mewa from Village Bihasara Khurd, among others.

This alleged conspiracy charges individuals with selling public land by fraudulently manipulating official records. This forms part of the public land scam recently exposed. It signifies a serious breach of public trust and a direct attack on the public exchequer.

The Role of Custodians: Who Was Responsible for Safeguarding This Land?

The land in question is public property, and its safeguarding is the obligated duty of key officials in the district.
Within the framework of the lately exposed public land scam, the complaint stresses that the custodians failed in their responsibility: they neglected their essential role in monitoring and protecting these valuable assets from misuse and exploitation.
This negligence not only undermines public trust but also poses a significant risk to the community, as such actions can lead to irreversible damage and loss of public resources.
Furthermore, the consequences of this failure can affect local development plans and erosion of the citizens’ rights, prompting scrutiny and demanding accountability from those entrusted with such critical oversight.
As the investigation unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that the repercussions may extend beyond individual missteps, potentially implicating systemic flaws within the governance structures designed to safeguard public interests.

1. District Magistrate, Mirzapur
2. Chief Revenue Officer, Mirzapur
3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar District Mirzapur
4. Tehsildar, Sadar District Mirzapur

Ashok Kumar Maurya, the complainant, argues that senior officers must uphold their duty by initiating legal proceedings to correct the manipulated records. This forms part of the broader narrative of the public land scam exposed recently.

The Bureaucratic Maze: A Call for Action Ignored

The allegations carry significant gravity. The submitted documentary evidence faces considerable administrative resistance, as seen in the public land scam recently exposed in the district.

• Many Representations: Various authorities have received more than two dozen representations. The issue has been, formally registered under grievance number GOVUP/E/2025/0086904 on 30/07/2025.
• The Lekhpal’s Response: A worrying aspect is the reported advice from the Lekhpal in their report. They urged the applicant (a private citizen) to submit a plaint before a competent court.
• The Legal Imperative: As per the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code-2006, specifically Section 32 (Correction of records) and Section 38, the custodians (the DM, CRO, SDM, Tehsildar) have the power and the legal obligation to initiate a suit. This is for the correction of revenue records when they detect such manipulation involving government land. Placing this burden on a law-abiding citizen is a clear dereliction of duty by the concerned officials.

---

The Path Forward: Demanding Accountability and Correction

This case highlights the urgent need to control the “tyranny and arbitrariness” that reportedly enables corruption within Tehsil Sadar. Echoing the theme of the public land scam exposed earlier, the authorities must respond to the applicant’s straightforward and legally sound plea:

• Immediate Investigation: The Vigilance Department or the Lokayukta must promptly take up this matter. They need to conduct a transparent and accountable corruption inquiry.
• Official Litigation: The District Magistrate/Chief Revenue Officer/Sub Divisional Magistrate/Tehsildar must file a plaint before the competent court. This is to correct the fraudulent Revenue records under Section 32/38 of the Revenue Code 2006. Importantly, this is their obligated legal duty, not the citizen’s.
• Exemplary Action: Honest governance, as championed by the Chief Minister, requires swift and decisive action against staff who collude to sell public assets for personal gain. This must stop the “anarchy” in the working of Tehsil Sadar. The public land scam exposed earlier provides a precedent that demands a strong response.

We urge all concerned authorities, including the Chief Minister’s Office (which is now handling the grievance), to direct the custodians of the land to fulfil their mandated duty. They must safeguard the public interest by correcting the fraudulent records and prosecuting the errant staff.

Tehsildar Sadar suggested Ashok Maurya to take shelter in court of law for correction of forgery committed in revenue record

Ashok Maurya submitted complaint against forgery of revenue records