Here are the key takeaways from the blog post regarding your RTI matter and the systemic issues involved. This overview is especially relevant for anyone engaged in the Fight for Financial Liberty:

• Financial Liberty at Risk: The core issue involves fraudulent automated data feeding of ₹6.6 Million in rent, which the applicant denies but the system continues to process.+1
• Procedural Violation of Section 6(3): CPIOs in Fatehpur and Allahabad failed to transfer the application to the correct custodian. The correct custodian includes entities such as the Investigation Wing. They improperly “disposed” of the request or reported “nil” information.+1
• Corruption and Human Rights Proviso: The applicant invoked Section 24(1). This section mandates that even exempt organizations must disclose information. Disclosure is required if it relates to allegations of corruption or human rights violations.
• Lack of Inter-Departmental Coordination: There is an active Police FIR (0291/2023). However, the Income Tax offices have refused to provide note sheets. They also refuse to identify officers who provided non-factual remarks to the police.+1
• Accountability via First Appeal: The filing of Appeal CCITL/A/E/26/00008 with the Pr. CCIT, Lucknow, shifts the burden to higher authorities to correct these procedural lapses and ensure transparency.
• Systemic Failure: The case highlights a “jurisdictional carousel.” Multiple offices claim the matter is “outside their scope.” They refrain from taking responsibility for the data accuracy within the PAN database.+1

🛡️ It’s time to join the Fight for Financial Liberty.

Fight for Financial Liberty: Transparency Under Attack

The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 serves as sunlight to disinfect corruption. However, administrative walls often block this light. The case of Shri Yogi MP Singh reveals how officials undermine the law through excuses.+4. Through such cases, we observe how people must fight for financial liberty and transparency when facing bureaucratic resistance.

The Core Conflict: Financial Liberty 💸

A serious plea regarding financial data integrity drives this case. The applicant alleges fraudulent automated data feeding of ₹6.6 Million. This error directly threatens the applicant’s financial liberty and legal standing.+4

The department’s machinery continues to process phantom data despite a formal denial. Therefore, this case highlights a growing digital concern. “Systems” now override factual evidence, leaving citizens to battle a ghost in the machine 🤖. Indeed, both individuals and society must continue to fight for financial liberty amidst algorithmic errors.

The Violation of Section 6(3) 🔄

The RTI application (Registration No. CCITL/R/T/26/00032) triggered several transfers. These responses illustrate a “jurisdictional carousel”.+2

• Fatehpur Response: The Income Tax Officer claimed information was “not available. Consequently, he treated the matter as “nil”.
• Allahabad Response: This office claimed the info “does not pertain” to them. Thus, they “disposed-off” the request improperly.+1
• Mirzapur Response: The office called the issues “outside the scope” of their jurisdiction. Furthermore, they told the citizen to find the “appropriate authority” alone.+1

Legal failure occurs here because a CPIO cannot simply close a request. Under Section 6(3), the CPIO must transfer the request to the correct custodian within five days. By failing to move the request to the Investigation Wing, these offices stalled the truth.+4. Furthermore, when officials ignore procedures, it becomes necessary for citizens to fight for financial liberty through legal action.

Corruption and Human Rights 📢

The applicant invoked the proviso to Section 24(1) of the RTI Act. Generally, some security organizations enjoy exemptions. However, these exemptions vanish when information involves corruption and human rights violations.+3

The applicant focused on hijacked credentials and systemic failure. Still, the department refused to provide note sheets for grievances CBODT/E/A/26/0000294 and others. This refusal occurred despite an active Police FIR 0291/2023. Such actions suggest a lack of cooperation that borders on obstruction.+4. As a result, those experiencing corruption must urgently fight for financial liberty to uphold their human rights.

The Role of the First Appellate Authority 🏛️(Fight for Financial Liberty)

The First Appeal (Registration No. CCITL/A/E/26/00008) shifts the focus to the Pr. CCIT, Lucknow. This authority holds the power to fix the process.

First, the FAA can order lower CPIOs to fulfill their Section 6(3) duties. Second, the FAA can identify officers who gave “non-factual remarks” regarding police cases. Finally, the FAA can release reports regarding the refusal to transfer cases to the Investigation Wing.+3. In this regard, the appellate process opens a new avenue. Citizens can fight for financial liberty when their rights are at risk.

Conclusion ✅

The case of Shri Yogi MP Singh reminds us that enforcement gives the RTI Act strength. The system fails when a citizen must file many appeals just for a simple transfer. Transparency is a right, not a favour. It ensures that public officials remain accountable and financial systems remain honest.+1

This appeal in Lucknow shows the persistence needed to defend liberty against bureaucracy. Ultimately, every effort contributes to the broader fight for financial liberty and honest governance.

Here are the specific identification and contact details for the public authorities involved in your RTI and appeal process:

1. Application and Appeal Identifiers (Fight for Financial Liberty)

• Original RTI Registration Number: DGTLK/R/E/26/00021
• Transferred RTI Registration Number: CCITL/R/T/26/00032 +1
• First Appeal Registration Number: CCITL/A/E/26/00008
• Relevant Grievance IDs: CBODT/E/A/26/0000294, CBODT/E/A/26/0000246, and CBODT/E/A/26/0000245 +2

---

2. Contact Details of Public Authorities (Fight for Financial Liberty)

Authority	Email Address	Telephone / Mobile
Pr. CCIT, Lucknow (Appellate Authority)	lucknow.acit.hq.admin@incometax.gov.in	0522-2466009
DGIT (Investigation), Lucknow	lucknow.ito.inv.hq.dgit@incometax.gov.in	0522-2233316
ITO, Ward-3(2), Mirzapur	mirzapur.ito3.2@incometax.gov.in +1	7379105911 (Applicant Ref)
ITO, Range-2(4), Fatehpur	fatehpur.ito2.4@incometax.gov.in	Not Provided
ITO, Ward-1(1), Allahabad	allahabad.ito1.1@incometax.gov.in	Not Provided
Addl. CIT, Range-1, Allahabad	allahabad.addlcit1@incometax.gov.in	Not Provided

---

3. Web Link Details (Fight for Financial Liberty)

• RTI Online Portal (Status Tracking): https://rtionline.gov.in/
• Income Tax Department (Official): https://incometaxindia.gov.in/
• CPGRAMS (Grievance Tracking): https://pgportal.gov.in/

Would you like me to help you draft a specific email to the Pr. CCIT Lucknow to attach the local office orders to your appeal? (Fight for Financial Liberty)

RTI Online __ Request_Appeal Form Details_merge