Institutional Apathy and the Battle for Inheritance: Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case

The struggle for fairness in land-related disputes in rural India often goes beyond simple civil lawsuits. Furthermore, it becomes a complex battle against administrative neglect and systemic violations of human rights. Notably, the Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, vividly shows this issue. Unfortunately, family betrayal allowed for the bypassing of a minor’s legal rights. Additionally, institutional partnership contributed to this breach.

---

The Genesis of a Conspiracy: Inheritance vs. Deception

The root of this legal battle goes back to 2005, after the death of Shambhu Saran Mishra. Under the U.P. Revenue Code, Sadhana Tiwari is the daughter of a deceased son, Siyakant Mishra. She received her father’s 1/4th share of the family property as a Class-1 heir.

At the time of her grandfather’s death, Sadhana was merely 10 years old. Despite her clear legal position, the executors intentionally omitted her name from the inheritance (Varasat) proceedings in 2007. They recorded the property only in the names of her uncles. These included Daya Shankar, Hari Prasad, and Shiv Shankar Mishra. They also included her grandmother’s name. (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

The “Paper Trail” of Fraud (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

Public records obtained by the applicant reveal a calculated sequence of events that point toward criminal intent:

• The Omission (June 19, 2007): Revenue Case Nos. 255/2007 and 256/2007 finalized the inheritance without mentioning the Class-1 minor heir.
• The Immediate Sale (July 7, 2007): The uncles secured the land in their names. Less than three weeks later, they made a sale. They sold a portion of the property to a third party.
• The Collusion: This process required the Lekhpal to verify the “Vanshavali” (family tree). Furthermore, the Tehsildar of Lalganj also participated. However, they allegedly ignored the Family Register, which clearly listed Sadhana as a household member.

Administrative Defiance: The Failure of the Police (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

When Sadhana Tiwari reached adulthood, she discovered the fraud. Consequently, she sought the intervention of the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC). On September 5, 2024, the Commission (Case No. 10035/24/55/2024) subsequently directed the Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur, to investigate the matter and ensure justice.

The complainant criticised the subsequent investigation conducted by (CO) Lalganj, labelling it as “arbitrary,” “inconsistent,” and “bogus.” The report from the CO, dated February 28, 2025, relied on the following claims:

1. An “oral partition” allegedly took place before 2001, effectively stripping Siyakant Mishra of his share before his death.
2. The matter is a “civil dispute.” Therefore, the police have no grounds to register an FIR for offences such as forgery or cheating.

Challenging the “Oral Partition” Narrative

The central flaw in the police’s “oral division” theory directly contradicts official revenue records. If someone had finalised a division before 2001, they would have split the land into separate names by then. A legacy process required action in 2007, indicating that the land remained jointly held under the grandfather’s name until 2005. (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

The police face accusations of accepting hearsay from the accused uncles while neglecting the documentary evidence of the 2007 Khatauni. This situation highlights a broader issue of “Abuse of Power.” Local authorities prioritise protecting influential figures instead of enforcing the law for vulnerable nationals.

The Transparency Battle: RTI and the Information Commission

Frustrated by the lack of clarity, the applicant subsequently escalated the matter to the State Information Commission (Appeal No: A-20250300419). In this appeal, the applicant seeks to compel the SP, Mirzapur, to produce the public record. Moreover, this record is a Registered Partition Deed that proves their claim of a pre-2001 settlement. (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

The appellant argues that the Right to Information (RTI) is, in fact, the sole tool left to combat the “fear-psychosis”; moreover, it also serves to fight corruption within the local police machinery. Without a registered deed, however, the police report fabricates a story that ultimately denies a woman her fundamental property rights.

National and State Oversight

The case has now gained traction at both the state and national levels:

• NHRC Involvement: The National Human Rights Commission (Diary No. 6291/IN/2025) has consequently attached the latest grievances to the main case file; thus, ensuring national monitoring of the Mirzapur administration.
• UPHRC Directives: The State Commission continues to oversee the case (Diary No. 4255/IN/2025); consequently, the applicant is demanding a high-level inquiry into the collusion between the Revenue staff of Tehsil Lalganj and the local police.

Conclusion: A Litmus Test for Accountability (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

The Sadhana Tiwari case is more than a family feud. It is a test of whether the constitutional values of transparency and accountability can survive at the grassroots level. It raises a haunting question: Which canon of law permits cheaters to seize the property of minors? This exploitation of their vulnerability is appalling.

As the hearing before the Information Commission approaches on September 26, 2025, the focus remains on two critical issues. The first is whether the state will uphold the rights of a girl child deprived of her inheritance. The second is if the “deep-rooted corruption” in the government machinery will continue to shield the offenders.

Based on the comprehensive documentation provided, here are the details in a structured format. These include application identifiers and contact information. You will also find relevant web links for your ongoing cases. (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

1. Case and Application Identifiers (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

These IDs are essential for tracking your grievances across different commissions:

• National Human Rights Commission (NHRC):
  • Case Number: 10035/24/55/2024
  • Diary Number: 6291/in/2025 (Received 09/09/2025)
• UP State Human Rights Commission (UPSHRC):
  • Main File Number: 10035/24/55/2024
  • Diary Number (Initial): 3613/IN/2024
  • Diary Number (January): 367/IN/2025
  • Diary Number (June): 4255/IN/2025
• UP Information Commission (RTI Appeal):
  • Appeal Registration Number: A-20250300419
  • File Number: S09/A/0719/2025
• Revenue Department (Mirzapur):
  • Revenue Case Numbers: 255/2007 and 256/2007 (Dated 19/06/2007)

---

2. Contact Information (Emails and Mobile Numbers) (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

The following contact details are derived from your correspondence and official records:

Complainant Details:

• Name: Sadhana Tiwari
• Mobile: 6387233091
• Email: sadhanamishramzp@gmail.com

Institutional Emails:

• NHRC: nhrc.india@nic.in
• UPHRC: uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, up-hrc@nic.in
• UP Information Commission (Court S-9): hearingcourts9.upic@up.gov.in
• Governor’s Office (UP): hgovup@nic.in
• Chief Minister’s Office (UP): cmup@nic.in
• DGP Office (UP): dgp@nic.in
• Police Authorities: spmz-up@nic.in (SP Mirzapur), digrmz@nic.in (DIG Mirzapur)

---

3. Web Links for Tracking and References (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)

You can use these portals to check the status of your applications or verify records:

• NHRC Case Status: www.nhrc.nic.in
• UP State Information Commission: www.upic.up.gov.in
• UP Human Rights Commission: uphrc.up.nic.in
• UP Revenue Records (Bhulekh): upbhulekh.gov.in (For Khatauni and inheritance tracking)
• Jansunwai (IGRS UP): jansunwai.up.nic.in (For tracking grievances submitted to the SP/CM office)

---

4. Summary of Key Entities Involved

Entity	Role in Your Case
SP Mirzapur	Primary Authority directed by UPHRC to investigate.
CO Lalganj	Officer who submitted the report dated 28/02/2025.
Tehsil Lalganj	Revenue office where the 2007 inheritance was processed.
SHO Drummond Ganj	Local police official accused of failing to register the FIR.

Would you like me to draft a specific email to the NHRC? In addition, it will reference your latest Diary Number 6291/in/2025. Consequently, this will be to request an update on the consolidated case. (Sadhana Tiwari Inheritance Case)