Judicial Redress & Police Accountability are critical components in ensuring that law enforcement agencies operate within the bounds of the law and respect the rights of citizens. The principle of judicial redress provides individuals with mechanisms to seek remedies when their rights are violated, particularly by police action. This accountability is essential to maintaining public…
Judicial Redress & Police Accountability are critical components in ensuring that law enforcement agencies operate within the bounds of the law and respect the rights of citizens. The principle of judicial redress provides individuals with mechanisms to seek remedies when their rights are violated, particularly by police action. This accountability is essential to maintaining public trust in the justice system. Moreover, it encourages transparency and proper conduct among police officers, fostering a safer environment for communities. By upholding these standards, society can work toward a more equitable justice system that prioritizes the protection of all individuals and holds law enforcement accountable for their actions.
Introduction
The analysis of the grievance highlights a critical breakdown in both Judicial Redress and Police Accountability. Specifically, there is an increasing disconnect between judicial directives and their actual enforcement by executive bodies. This widening gap raises concerns about the effectiveness of legal protections and public trust in law enforcement.
Despite clear protections the High Court established, your case exposes three critical failures in the administrative process: (Judicial Redress & Police Accountability)
1. Disregard for High Court Mandates
At the centre of this dispute, local authorities openly defy the Allahabad High Court’s guidelines on the misuse of preventive sections (126/135 BNSS). The High Court has imposed a ₹25,000 pecuniary penalty on officers who misuse these powers. Even so, the police continue to submit “concocted stories” rather than enforce the law against fraudulent property sales.
2. The “Competency Gap” in Public Office
A fundamental competence crisis grips the local executive branch. Investigating officers submit illegible handwritten reports and fail to grasp the legal depth of your grievance — particularly regarding “fraudulent conveyance” to avoid maintenance. As a result, the digital grievance portals (Jansunwai/IGRS) deliver no effective relief.
3. Subversion of the Judicial Process (Judicial Redress & Police Accountability)
The Family Court is actively adjudicating your case (915/2021). Nevertheless, police inaction allows the illegal liquidation of ancestral assets to continue unchecked. Consequently, this strips the applicant of the very resources needed to fulfil potential legal obligations — a direct subversion of the court’s future verdict.
The Travesty of Justice: Judicial Redress, Police Accountability, and the Cry of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal
The Indian legal system routinely traps the common citizen in a labyrinth of bureaucracy, illegible reports, and systemic apathy. The case of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal (Grievance Registration: DEPOJ/E/2025/0004908) illustrates precisely how institutional failure exacerbates personal crises. Moreover, at its heart, this is not merely a dispute over land or dowry — it is a battle against the “mockery of the law of land.”
The Core Conflict: A Family Divided by Deceit
The grievance stems from a complex intersection of family law and criminal allegations. On one side, Mr Jaiswal battles his wife (Priyanka Jaiswal vs Naresh Kumar Jaiswal, Case 915/2021) over domestic violence and maintenance claims. On the other hand, his father allegedly liquidates ancestral assets to strip him of his inheritance and legal rights. Mr Jaiswal raises a primary contention: the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court II summons him to answer maintenance and dowry claims, yet simultaneously, his father illegally sells off the very resources intended to satisfy those legal obligations. His father.
The Legal Quagmire: Misuse of the BNSS, Illegal Sales, and the Failure of Police Accountability
One of the most striking aspects of this grievance is the allegation against the Mirzapur Police Department. Indeed, the applicant highlights a specific “travesty of justice” regarding the Indian Citizens Security Code (Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – BNSS). Misuse of Sections 126/135: Police officers misuse these sections and ignore circulars from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Those circulars clearly mandate a pecuniary penalty of ₹25,000 for such misuse. Negating property during the pendency of a court case to avoid future financial liability is often viewed as “fraudulent conveyance.” Mr Jaiswal argues that his father is selling movable and immovable ancestral properties without a formal partition, effectively committing “cheating” under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
The “Illiteracy” of the Executive: A Barrier to Judicial Redress & Police Accountability
A recurring theme in Mr Jaiswal’s appeals is the investigating officers’ display of sheer incompetence. Specifically, he points to a fundamental breakdown in communication: the Jansunwai (IGRS) portal, which police personnel often make illegible. If an officer cannot write a report clearly in Hindi, how can they be expected to parse complex legal grievances?
Lack of Comprehension: The police submitted a “concocted story” that bore no relevance to the actual submissions. This reflects a “crunch of competent people” in public offices. As a result, officers who fail to understand a complaint deliver arbitrary and inconsistent reports.
“When the concerned investigation officer does not understand the contents of the grievance, how can he provide an appropriate solution? At least those providing justice to the common people must be qualified.” (Judicial Redress & Police Accountability)
The Plight of the “Puppet” Bridegroom
In a poignant reflection on social norms, Mr Jaiswal describes himself as a “puppet” in a traditional Hindu marriage, following the dictates of his father. He clarifies that:
The dowry and ornaments were taken by his father, not himself.
His father is attempting to label him as a “madman” without any medical basis to delegitimise his claims to the property.
He is a commerce graduate, yet he is being treated as incompetent by both his family and the local authorities.
This narrative underscores a common tragedy in Indian family disputes — the individual trapped between the high expectations of the law and the crushing weight of patriarchal family dynamics.
Legal Remedies and the Path Forward: Securing Judicial Redress & Police Accountability
Mr Jaiswal’s grievance correctly identifies several legal pathways that the Department of Justice and the Government of Uttar Pradesh should facilitate:
Attachment of Property
Preventing further transactions of ancestral land during litigation.
Setting Aside the Sale
Declaring sales void if they were made in bad faith to evade court-ordered payments.
Directing the police to charge the father and brother under BNS for cheating.
Conclusion: A Call for Judicial Redress & Police Accountability
The Department of Justice (JSJII) marks the grievance as “Under Process,” while the Government of Uttar Pradesh has closed it. The closure, in turn, left the applicant profoundly dissatisfied and denied him meaningful Judicial Redress & Police Accountability.
The case of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal puts the Department of Justice to a litmus test. Fundamentally, it demands an answer: can the Jansunwai portal and the CPGRAMS system actually deliver justice, or do they merely store “illegible” reports?
For justice to be served, the authorities must look beyond the “concocted stories” of local personnel and address the core issue: the systematic stripping of a citizen’s ancestral rights and the failure of police to uphold High Court directives. True Judicial Redress & Police Accountability demands nothing less.
Judicial Redress & Police Accountability: The High Court’s Directive vs Executive Apathy
In the pursuit of Judicial Redress & Police Accountability, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad has established clear safeguards against the misuse of preventive legal provisions. However, the grievance of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal (Registration: DEPOJ/E/2025/0004908) exposes a disturbing disconnect. Judicial mandates, it turns out, do not translate into the ground reality of police conduct in Uttar Pradesh. blatant disregard for specific High Court guidelines aimed at curbing the “mockery of the law” by local authorities.
The Mandate: Protecting Citizens from Executive Overreach
The applicant highlights a critical legal safeguard: Section 126 and Section 135 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), formerly similar provisions under the CrPC. Although these sections exist to maintain peace, local police frequently weaponise them to bypass due process.
The High Court of Allahabad has, in numerous landmark rulings and subsequent government circulars, directed that:
Accountability for Misuse: A specific directive issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh, in compliance with the High Court’s orders, stipulates that any public official found guilty of misusing these powers shall be punished with a pecuniary penalty of ₹25,000.
Despite this, the Mirzapur police not only ignore these guidelines but also submit “concocted stories” to the Jansunwai portal. In doing so, they actively cover up their failure to act against the illegal sale of ancestral property.
The Systemic Failure: Illegible Reports, Lack of Competence, and Eroded Police Accountability
A directive is only as strong as its implementation. Accordingly, Mr Jaiswal’s grievance highlights a “travesty of justice” — investigating officers who appear fundamentally unqualified to handle legal submissions.
Failure of Comprehension: The applicant argues that personnel simply do not understand the legal contents of the complaint — and that this is the “root cause” of his unresolved grievance. Consequently, officers produce “arbitrary and inconsistent” reports that bear no relation to the actual submissions.
“Where is the justice in this largest democracy in the world when those providing justice cannot write Hindi legibly or understand the judicial notice vs Physical Reality: The Test of Judicial Redress & police accountability
The Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court II issued a summons (Case 915/2021), which the applicant has presented as evidence. This judicial notice is not merely a piece of paper; it is a legal command.
The High Court’s stance on Judicial Redress & Police Accountability is clear: when a matter is sub-judice, the executive must intervene immediately against any attempt to subvert the outcome — such as a father selling ancestral property to avoid paying maintenance. Yet the local police fail to stop the “fraudulent conveyance” of these properties. In doing so, they actively subvert the judicial process and directly violate the spirit of the High Court’s guidelines.
Essential Steps for Redressal
To align the current situation with the HighTo align the current situation with the High Court’s directives, the Department of Justice and the UP Chief Minister’s Secretariat must take the following actions without delay:ct of the officers who filed the “concocted” report and, if found in violation of the Allahabad High Court’s guidelines, impose the mandated ₹25,000 fine.
Mandate Legibility: Require that officers type or write all reports uploaded to the Jansunwai portal in clear, legible script. This step is essential to ensure accountability and transparency.
Stay on Property Transactions: In line with the principle of preventing “fraudulent conveyance,” the administration must act on grievances (GOVUP/E/2025/0050576) immediately. Specifically, authorities must halt the sale of disputed ancestral properties until the Family Court reaches a verdict.
Conclusion: Restoring Faith Through Judicial Redress & Police Accountability
The case of Naresh Kumar Jaiswal is a defining cry for Judicial Redress & Police Accountability — a demand that the Executive respect the Judiciary. When police officers treat High Court directives as optional or submit illegible reports to conceal their inaction, they weaken the entire democratic structure. Therefore, justice must not only be done — it must be seen to be done. Authorities must ensure clear, competent, and legally sound reporting that upholds the principles of Judicial Redress & Police Accountability at every level.
Based on the grievance documents provided, the following section sets out structured contact details and web-linked information for the public authorities involved in your case. These specific offices currently handle your “Under Process” grievance and the “Closed” complaints.
1. Central Authority: Department of Justice (Govt. of India)
This authority currently handles your active grievance regarding the “Travesty of Justice” and the inconsistency of police reports.
Concerned Officer: Shri Biswanath Sahoo
Designation: Deputy Secretary
Organisation Name: JSJII (Justice II Section)
Contact Address: Department of Justice, Jaisalmer House, 26-Mansingh Road, New Delhi – 110011
2. State Authority: Chief Minister’s Secretariat (Uttar Pradesh)
This office oversees the Jansunwai (IGRS) portal, where previous grievances produced unsatisfactory results and authorities closed them without resolution.
Since your grievance mentions the misuseof sections 126/135 BNSS and the failure of local police personnel, these are the supervisory links for Mirzapur: (Judicial Redress & Police Accountability)
Would you like me to draft a professional email to Shri Biswanath Sahoo (Department of Justice), attaching the summons and the illegible police report as proof of your claims?
Home » Judicial Redress & Police Accountability Explained
One response to “Judicial Redress & Police Accountability Explained”
Bhoomika Singh
Undoubtedly it is reflecting the deep rooted anarchy in the government machinery and if numerous representations are being submitted by the aggrieved then justice must be available to him.
Loading…
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.Cancel reply
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.