🕵️ Navigating the RTI Appeal Process in India: A Case Study in Accountability

The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 is a powerful instrument for Indian citizens, designed to promote transparency and accountability in government.¹ It empowers individuals to seek information from public authorities. Nonetheless, the process isn’t always smooth. This case study examines a specific instance involving a denied RTI request for a scam investigation, illustrating the challenges faced and the proper steps to take when information is withheld.

---

The Core Issue: A Denied RTI in a Scholarship Scam Investigation

A multi-year investigation into a scholarship scam has yielded nil final findings. When attempts were made to fix accountability using the RTI Act, the police allegedly escaped from providing information, raising concerns about the investigation officers’ ulterior motives.

Case Overview: A Citizen’s Quest for Information

The case involves an individual, Yogi M. P. Singh, who sought information about a specific criminal matter.

• RTI Application Details:
  • Registration Number: PCLKO/R/2024/60869
  • Date Filed: November 20, 2024
  • Public Authority: Police Commissioner Office, Lucknow
  • Information Sought: Details about Criminal Case No. 119/2023, involving sections 120B, 409, 420, and 467 of the Indian Penal Code.
  • Public Information Officer (PIO): Dhananjay Singh Kushwaha, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police.

The First Setback: RTI Denied by the PIO

On December 6, 2024, the PIO, Dhananjay Singh Kushwaha, disposed of the RTI request.

• Reason for Denial: The PIO cited the “absence of the FIR number related to the matter.”
• The Disconnect: This denial highlights a critical point of friction. The applicant clearly mentioned the case number (119/2023) in the original application. However, the PIO claimed the information could not be provided because the FIR number was missing, despite the case number being clearly documented.

Taking the Next Step: The First Appeal

Frustrated with the denial, Yogi M. P. Singh exercised his fundamental right to appeal. The RTI Act allows a citizen to file an appeal with the First Appellate Authority (FAA) if the RTI inquiry is rejected or not responded to within 30 days.²

• Appeal Details:
  • Registration Number: PCLKO/A/2025/60003
  • Date Filed: January 6, 2025
  • First Appellate Authority (FAA): Anil Kumar Yadav, Deputy Commissioner of Police.
  • Primary Ground for Appeal: “Refused access to Information Requested.”

The Power of Documentation: Attaching Supporting Evidence

In his appeal, Yogi M. P. Singh meticulously detailed the inconsistencies and oversights in the PIO’s response. He demonstrated the effectiveness of a well-documented and well-argued appeal by including key evidence:

• He highlighted an oversight by the inspector of Kotwali Hazratganj, who had not noted the first page of the attached PDF which contained the case number.
• He cited the report of the Investigating Officer, Pramod Kumar Pandey, which explicitly mentioned the criminal case number (119/2023) and confirmed that the case was under investigation.

The applicant attached the following documents to strengthen his case:

• The first page of his original RTI application (with the case number).
• The PIO’s denial response.
• The Investigating Officer’s report (confirming the existence and status of the case).

This approach provided a clear and compelling basis for the FAA to review the case, proving the information was available and the denial was based on an apparent oversight.

---

Conclusion: Lessons Learned for RTI Applicants

This case study provides valuable lessons for anyone filing an RTI application or an appeal, emphasizing that the RTI Act is a fundamental right that, when utilized correctly, can effectively hold government bodies accountable.

• Be Specific: Provide as much detail as possible to narrow the request and prevent rejections. Providing the specific criminal case number was crucial here.
• Keep Detailed Records: Maintain a complete record of all communication: the original application, the PIO’s response, and any supporting documents.
• Exercise Your Right to Appeal: If your request is denied or you receive an unsatisfactory response, do not hesitate to file a first appeal. It is a vital step for a higher authority to review the decision.
• Offer Supporting Evidence: When appealing, include all relevant documents that show the public authority’s error or negligence.

That is a great question! Understanding the prescribed time limits is crucial for navigating the RTI process effectively and holding authorities accountable.

Here is a breakdown of the key timelines for the original application and the subsequent appeal stages under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005:

⏳ RTI Application and Appeal Timelines

Stage	Action By	Time Limit for Applicant to File	Time Limit for Authority to Dispose
Original Application (Sec 7)	Public Information Officer (PIO)	N/A	30 days from receipt of application. (For matters concerning life or liberty, the time limit is 48 hours.)
First Appeal (Sec 19(1))	First Appellate Authority (FAA)	30 days from: * The date of receiving the PIO’s decision, OR * The date the PIO’s decision was due (i.e., the expiry of the 30-day limit).	30 days from the receipt of the appeal. (Can be extended to 45 days for reasons recorded in writing.)
Second Appeal (Sec 19(3))	Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC)	90 days from: * The date of receiving the FAA’s decision, OR * The date the FAA’s decision was due (i.e., the expiry of the 30/45-day limit).	No time limit is specified in the Act, but Commissions aim to dispose of them as expeditiously as possible.

---

Key Takeaways and Important Notes:

• Condonation of Delay: For both the First and Second Appeals, the respective authority (FAA or CIC/SIC) may admit an appeal filed after the prescribed time limit if the applicant can demonstrate they were prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
• Deemed Refusal: If the PIO does not respond within the 30-day limit, it is treated as a “deemed refusal”, and you can proceed directly to filing the First Appeal.
• No Time Limit for Disposal of Second Appeal: While the Act gives the Information Commissions the ultimate authority, it does not set a mandatory time frame for them to decide on a Second Appeal. This can sometimes lead to delays, as noted in various case reports.

The case you shared about Yogi M. P. Singh perfectly illustrates the importance of adhering to these appeal rights when the initial process fails!

That is a crucial request, especially when you need to file a Second Appeal or a Complaint under the RTI Act, as illustrated in the case study.

Here are the contact details, emails, and web links for the main authorities involved in the Right to Information process in India, including the Central apex body and the one relevant to the Lucknow case (Uttar Pradesh):

💻 Key RTI Authority Contact Details

1. RTI Online Portal (For Central Government RTI Applications)

This is the primary web portal for filing RTI applications and first appeals to Central Government Ministries/Departments.

Detail	Information
Web Link	https://rtionline.gov.in/
Help Desk Phone	011-24622461 (Normal office hours)
Help Desk Email	helprtionline-dopt[at]nic[dot]in

2. Central Information Commission (CIC)

The CIC is the final appellate authority for all matters concerning Central Public Authorities.

Detail	Information
Web Link	https://cic.gov.in/
Facilitation Desk Phone	011-26767500 / 011-26183053
Facilitation Desk Email	fdesk-cic[at]gov[dot]in
Address	CIC Bhawan, Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka, New Delhi – 110067

3. Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission (UPSIC)

Since the case study involves the Police Commissioner Office in Lucknow, the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission would be the final appellate authority for a Second Appeal or Complaint in this matter.

Detail	Information
Web Link	https://upsic.up.gov.in/
Office Phone	0522-2724930
General Email	webmaster-upic[at]up[dot]gov[dot]in
PIO Email (Admin)	jansu-section.upic[at]up[dot]gov[dot]in
Address	7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

---

Important Note on Email Addresses:

Please replace the [at] with @ and [dot] with . when using the email addresses above. This is a common practice to prevent spam bots from harvesting the addresses.

Would you like the direct link to the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission’s portal for filing a Second Appeal online?

RTI Application Status: Scholarship Scam Investigation

Government of Uttar Pradesh is only changing investigation officer in scholarship scandal