Key Takeaways

• Naresh Kumar Jaiswal lodged a grievance about a conspiracy of father to deprive him of his ancestral property, involving allegations of fraud and domestic violence.
• The applicant claims his father is not providing his rightful share of ancestral properties and has sold them without legal consent, indicating a serious conspiracy.
• Naresh requests police action against his father and brother under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for cheating, highlighting the urgent nature of the conspiracy of father.
• The controversy intertwines with a domestic violence case linked to the father’s fraudulent activities, raising questions about maintenance and property rights.
• The grievance has been forwarded to the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s Secretariat, underscoring the complexity and dire implications of this father-focused conspiracy.

🚨 Urgent Plea for Justice: Conspiracy of father to deprive son from ancestral property

---

A serious complaint has been, lodged with the Uttar Pradesh administration. It highlights an serious family dispute including ancestral property, allegations of fraud, and an ongoing domestic violence case. Naresh Kumar Jaiswal, refers to a conspiracy chalked out by his father and younger brother. The conspiracy of the father has deeply affected the family dynamics. Therefore, Naresh seeks the intervention of the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to address the alleged cheating activities. This case presents a complex intersection of civil property law and criminal family matters. A conspiracy by Naresh’s father is at the core, specifically the conspiracy of a father.

The Core of the Dispute is Conspiracy of father: Ancestral Property and Fraud Claims

The heart of the complaint revolves around the applicant’s share in ancestral properties. The key allegations against his father and younger brother include a conspiracy involving fraudulent actions against him. This suggests a sinister scheme by his father to deprive his son of his share. This is a vivid example of a conspiracy involving a father against Naresh, a conspiracy of father indeed.

• Deprivation of Share: The applicant claims his father is not providing his rightful share of the ancestral properties, showcasing a deliberate move by the father within this conspiracy.
• Unauthorized Sale of Property: Crucially, he states that his father has sold ancestral properties even though no legal partition has taken place within the family. Under Hindu law, ancestral property is generally, held jointly. It cannot be, alienated without the consent of all coparceners (which may include sons and daughters by birth). Such actions by the father feed into the conspiracy. This involves him and his control over property rights.
• Call for Criminal Action: The applicant explicitly requests that the police charge his father and younger brother under the relevant sections for cheating of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), a clear indication of the gravity of the alleged fraud. (The BNS section concerning cheating is Section 318, which deals with dishonestly inducing a person to deliver property).

The Intertwined Domestic Violence Case

The property dispute has become closely linked with a separate, yet related, legal matter: a domestic violence and maintenance case instituted by the applicant’s wife. Here, the father’s involvement in this father-focused conspiracy is immoral and illegal. Indeed, his father’s ongoing actions are intricately, tied to this conspiracy by the father concerning the domestic issues faced by the applicant and his family.

• Link to Fraud: The applicant asserts that the domestic violence case was, filed due to his father’s fraudulent activities and a conspiracy to deprive the family of their rightful property. This underlines the extent of influence the father’s conspiracy entails, central to which is the conspiracy of the father.
• Maintenance Concern: He has raised a critical question for the court: if his father is continually selling off the ancestral assets, from where will the maintenance and other court-ordered demands be, fulfilled? He requests a directive to stop any further sale of property without court permission. This stresses the need to halt the conspiracy involving sales initiated by the father.
• False Allegation of Lunacy: The applicant also highlights the extreme measure taken by his father. He allegedly declared his own educated son as mindless without any medical expert’s findings. This suggests an attempt to disqualify him from claiming his share. This is yet another move in this father-centric conspiracy.

Status and Appeal for Action

The grievance, with registration number GOVUP/E/2024/0080446, was, received on 08/11/2024. It has been, Forwarded to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) in the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Secretariat. This situation involving a conspiracy of father and brother prompted a detailed review of the family’s claims.

The applicant’s urgent plea is for the “most respected Sir” (the concerned officer) to direct the police to take appropriate action against his father and brother for cheating the family out of their ancestral shares. Given the father’s conspiracy, the case’s complexity demands immediate scrutiny. It merges property rights (where a coparcener has a birthright) with severe family and criminal allegations. Thorough legal and administrative scrutiny about the father’s conspiracy in connection to property rights is needed.

---

Finally, the conspiracy involving Naresh’s father adds a layer of complexity and urgency to the situation. It has severe implications for family trust and justice. This father’s conspiracy disrupts family harmony. Moreover, it poses questions on legal rights and protection. What are your thoughts on this complex family and property dispute? Would you like to know more about the rights of a son in ancestral property under Indian law?

S.D.M. Lalganj treating Jansunwai portal only show piece quite obvious from arbitrary report

Sub divisional magistrate Lalganj is not ordering enquiry in matter of corruption