Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders
Ignoring human rights orders can lead to a cascade of negative outcomes, not only for the affected individuals but also for society as a whole. By disregarding these essential rights, governments and institutions risk fuelling widespread discontent, social unrest, and violence. Victims of human rights violations often experience severe psychological and physical harm, leading to a breakdown of trust between citizens and authorities. Furthermore, nations that ignore these orders may face international condemnation, sanctions, or even isolation, which can hinder their economic and diplomatic relations. Ultimately, the failure to uphold human rights erodes the foundational principles of justice and equality that sustain a peaceful society.

The key takeaways from this blog post are as follows:

The key takeaways from the case of Sadhana Tiwari vs Mirzapur Police Administration centre on the breakdown of accountability and the systemic obstruction of justice. Here are the core points:

1. Disregard for Constitutional Authority

The primary issue is the non-compliance with a direct order from the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC). Despite a clear directive issued on September 5, 2024, the Superintendent of Police (SP) Mirzapur has failed to take legal action or provide the mandated status update to the complainant.

2. Failure of “Good Governance”

While the state administration promotes a “zero-tolerance” policy toward crime, the local police response suggests the opposite. By failing to register an FIR in a case involving the forgery of land records and the usurpation of a minor’s rights, the local authorities are undermining the state’s governance narrative.

3. Weaponizing Administrative Silence (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

The police have used “bureaucratic stonewalling” to avoid transparency. This behaviour is evidenced by:

• RTI Denials: Using technicalities (e.g., claiming information is “not related” to their specific office) to hide file notings and action reports.
• Circular Logic: Shifting responsibility between the SP office and the Circle Officer (CO) of Lalganj to create a loop of unaccountability.

4. Legal Errors in Police Reporting

The police reports allegedly rely on a “family settlement” involving a 10-year-old minor. Under the Indian Contract Act, a minor cannot enter into such a contract, making the police’s justification for inaction legally flawed and arbitrary.

5. Call for Higher Intervention (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

The grievance highlights that when local police act as “judges” rather than “investigators”, the only recourse is escalation. The matter now rests with the Chief Minister’s Secretariat (Shri Arvind Mohan) to ensure that the UPHRC’s orders are not treated as optional.

This blog post addresses the critical failure of the Mirzapur Police to comply with the directives of the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) in the case of Sadhana Tiwari.

Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders: When the Police Ignore Human Rights Mandates

Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders: A widow’s struggle for her ancestral rights in Uttar Pradesh has unveiled significant administrative failures. The case of Sadhana Tiwari (Registration No: GOVUP/E/2025/0058709) transcends a simple property dispute; it serves as a critical examination of the rule of law under Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. Directives from constitutional bodies like the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) are not optional—they are binding mandates. However, in Mirzapur, these mandates seem to vanish into a void of police indifference

1. The Genesis: A Minor’s Rights Usurped

The core of this grievance dates back to 2005, following the death of Sadhana Tiwari’s grandfather. As a 10-year-old minor and a Class-I heir under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Sadhana was legally entitled to her share of the ancestral property. However, through a calculated criminal conspiracy involving relatives and revenue officials (Lekhpal and Tehsildar), her name was allegedly struck out from the records.

This is not a simple “civil land dispute”, as the police often claim to evade work. It is a case of forgery (Section 467/468 IPC), cheating (Section 420 IPC), and criminal conspiracy (Section 120B IPC).

2. The UPHRC Directive: An Ignored Order

On September 5, 2024, the UPHRC took cognisance of the matter. Recognising the gravity of the allegation in Mirzapur, the commission directed the Superintendent of Police (SP) in Mirzapur to:

• Look into the matter personally.
• Take necessary action in accordance with the law.
• Provide an intimation of the action taken to the complainant.

Despite these efforts, months have passed with zero compliance. The SP’s office has neither registered an FIR nor provided the mandated “intimation” to Sadhana.

3. Weaponizing the RTI Act to Shield Inaction

When Sadhana Tiwari attempted to track the progress of the UPHRC order through the Right to Information (RTI) Act, officials systematically obstructed her efforts. The Public Information Officer (PIO) and the Circle Officer (CO) of Lalganj denied information on several flimsy grounds:

• The “Not Related” Defence: Claiming the information does not concern their office, even though the CO is the investigative arm of the SP.
• The “Non-Archival” Excuse: In previous RTI replies, officials have argued that current orders are not “archival” and thus not disclosable—a blatant misinterpretation of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

This administrative silence, in itself, serves as a “reason to believe” that corruption is being protected. By refusing to name the official who received the UPHRC order or provide the file notings, the Mirzapur Police are effectively obstructing justice.

4. Good Governance vs. Ground Reality

The Uttar Pradesh government prides itself on “Good Governance” and the protection of women’s rights. However, Sadhana’s grievance, which was forwarded to Joint Secretary Shri Arvind Mohan, highlights that the system fails as soon as a local official decides to “sit” on a file.

The Circle Officer’s report, dated February 28, 2025, has been characterised as “bogus” and “arbitrary” because it relies on a “family settlement” involving a 10-year-old minor—a legal impossibility under the Indian Contract Act.

5. The Way Forward: Accountability

If the police continue to harass women and suppress voices to hide their own negligence, the following steps are inevitable:

• Non-Compliance Petition: Filing a formal complaint of “Wilful Disobedience” with the UPHRC to summon the SP Mirzapur in person. (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)
• Writ of Mandamus: Approaching the Allahabad High Court to compel the police to perform their statutory duty.
• Section 20 RTI Penalties: Pursuing the State Information Commission to penalise the PIOs for their 4-month delay and “malafide” denial of information.

---

Conclusion

The case of Sadhana Tiwari is a clear warning. When the police ignore the Human Rights Commission and the RTI Act, they don’t just fail one woman; they weaken the entire democratic fabric of the state. It is time for the Chief Minister’s Secretariat to hold the Mirzapur Police accountable. (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

Based on your grievance regarding the non-compliance of the UPHRC order by the Mirzapur Police, here are the official contact details for the concerned authorities. You can use these to send formal reminders, legal notices, or an “Application for Prosecution” for non-compliance.

---

1. Local Police Authorities (Mirzapur) (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

These are the officers directly responsible for implementing the UPHRC directive dated September 5, 2024.

Authority / Office	Contact Name / Rank	Mobile (CUG)	Email Address
S.P. Mirzapur	DIG/SSP Somen Barma	9454400299	spmzr-up@nic.in
Addl. SP (Operation)	Manish Kumar Mishra	9454401105	asp-op.mi@up.gov.in
Addl. SP (City)	Nitesh Singh	9454401104	asp-city.mi@up.gov.in
Circle Officer (Lalganj)	Amar Bahadur (DSP)	9454401592	co-lalganj.mi@up.gov.in
Police Station Lalganj	Inspector In-charge	9454404013	–

Note: For RTI matters, the Addl SP (Operation) usually acts as the Public Information Officer (PIO) for the district.

---

2. Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

Since the SP Mirzapur has failed to comply with their order, you may file a “Non-Compliance Report” or “Contempt Petition” here.

• Office Address: 609 Krishna Fort Apartment, Faizabad Road, Near BMW Showroom, Lucknow 226010.
• Official Website: hrcup.org
• Email for Status/Complaints: admin@hrcup.org / complaints@hrcup.org
• Contact Number: 9454003726
• ADG (Human Rights): Raj Kumar (9454400120 / humanrightshq@nic.in)

---

3. Chief Minister’s Secretariat (Lucknow) (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

Your grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0058709) is currently forwarded to this office. Use these details for high-level follow-ups.

• Concerned Officer: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
• Office Phone: 0522-2226350 / 0522-2226354
• Email Address: arvind.12574@gov.in
• CMO Email: cmup@nic.in
• Address: Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow.

---

4. Web Links for Tracking & Filing (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

• UP IGRS (Jansunwai) Portal: jansunwai.up.nic.in
• UP Police Official Directory: uppolice.gov.in/frmOfficials
• CCTNS UP (For Online FIR/Status): cctnsup.gov.in

---

Suggested Next Step (Consequences of Ignoring Human Rights Orders)

Since you mentioned that the PIO and Circle Officer denied information by claiming it “does not relate to their office,” you are entitled to file a First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act to the First Appellate Authority (usually the SP/SSP Mirzapur).

Would you like me to draft a “First Appeal” letter for the RTI denial or a “Notice of Non-Compliance” to be sent to the SP of Mirzapur?