Key Takeaways

• The article discusses allegations of police non-compliance and contradictory reporting in Mirzapur, raising concerns of contempt of court.
• It highlights the police’s failure to enforce a civil court ‘status quo’ order amid ongoing construction, indicating possible complicity.
• Inconsistent reporting from the Senior Superintendent of Police raises questions about competence and accountability within the local police force.
• Allegations of corruption cast doubt on the police’s inaction about the court order, suggesting a systemic issue.
• The complainant seeks legal action against misleading officials, citing relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code related to contempt of court.

🚨 Police Non-Compliance with Court Orders: A Case of Alleged Contempt of Court in Mirzapur

This blog post analyzes a serious public grievance about the alleged non-compliance and contradictory reporting by the Mirzapur police. This is about a civil court order. It leads to contempt of court and raises questions about competence and corruption within the local force.

---

The Core Grievance: Police Disregard for a Civil Court ‘Status Quo’ Order thus committed Contempt of Court

The crux of the grievance, filed by Ashok Kumar Maurya (registration numbers GOVUP/E/2025/0085719 and GOVUP/E/2025/0068150), revolves around the alleged failure of the Mirzapur police. Specifically, the Station House Officer (SHO) of Jigna Police Station to enforce a Civil Court order. This order mandates the maintenance of a “status quo” in a disputed area amid accusations of contempt of court.

• Violation of Court Order: The complainant alleges that offenders disturbed the “status quo” by undertaking new construction. Specifically, the construction of drainage and the opening of a door in the impugned area. This highlights the court’s contempt by these actions.
• Police Inaction: Despite receiving information, the concerned police personnel allegedly acted as “mute spectators.” They reportedly allowed the violations to occur. This suggests that they are complicit or negligent, both of which can be viewed through the lens of contempt of court.
• Contempt of Court: The complainant asserts that the police’s failure to enforce a civil court order or decree, especially if willful or negligent, can constitute contempt of court.

---

🧐 Inconsistent Reporting: Questioning Competence and Accountability

A significant part of the grievance highlights the inconsistent and arbitrary reports submitted by the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Mirzapur, to the Chief Minister’s Office regarding the matter. This raises issues of contempt of the court’s expectations in this ongoing situation.

• Conflicting Reports: The complainant points out the discrepancy between the SSP’s reports dated 2, 2025, June 4, 2025, and July 14, 2025. This suggests a failure to understand the core issue. It gives rise to contempt of the court’s orders.
• Competency Deficit: This inconsistency leads the complainant to question whether the Mirzapur police lack “competent police personnel” who can accurately “understand the contents of the grievances submitted by the common people in the state.” Furthermore, they lack understanding of the simple meaning of “status quo.” By failing to fully grasp these points, they risk engaging in contempt of court.
• Arbitrary Reporting: Individuals send arbitrary reports “without going into the merit of the case,” which causes “multiple grievances and complaints.” This behavior reflects “anarchy and corruption” within the framework and contributes to perceptions of contempt of court.

---

💰 Allegations of Corruption: Direct and Circumstantial Evidence

The grievance explicitly raises strong allegations of corruption as the underlying reason for the police’s inaction and failure to follow the court order. This also shades the issue with tones of contempt for the court’s authority.

• Circumstantial Evidence: The complainant argues that the police personnel’s passive role—remaining silent during the construction of drainage and opening of the door—serves as “circumstantial evidence of corruption.” They believe the offenders violated the court order. This was done by “engaging the concerned police personnel in good faith through corruption.” This situation invokes issues of contempt of court.
• Context of Corruption: The grievance references a prior incident. A vigilance team caught two sub inspectors of the police in Mirzapur red handed. This serves as evidence of the “rampant corruption” that prevails in the Mirzapur police force. Courts usually view this situation through the lens of contempt.

---

⚖️ Legal Implications: Seeking Action Against Misleading Officials

The complainant directly calls for action against the SSP Mirzapur for allegedly “misleading government” with inconsistent and possibly false reports. The grievance cites specific sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) that may apply:

• Section 182 IPC: Pertains to knowingly submitting false information to a public servant with the intent to cause harm or mislead. The potential punishment is up to 6 months imprisonment, a fine, or both.
• Section 177 IPC: Concerns the furnishing of false information in non-criminal matters, carrying a similar penalty. This aligns with some aspects of what forms contempt of court.
• Section 211 IPC: Applicable if the false report falsely accuses someone of a serious offense. It carries a heavier punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment and a fine.

The complainant urges the Superintendent of Police or District Magistrate to escalate the issue if local police stay unresponsive. They emphasize that they attach all evidence of the court order and non-compliance to the grievance for necessary action. This underscores the critical nature of addressing any contempt of court.

---

Next Steps for the Grievance

The Chief Minister Secretariat, Uttar Pradesh, has officially received the grievance and forwarded it to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary), the officer concerned. This indicates that a high-level review and intervention are now underway. It highlights the seriousness of possible contempt of court issues.

This case involving Ashok Kumar Maurya highlights a growing concern in Mirzapur regarding the intersection of police accountability and judicial authority. The core issue is the alleged Contempt of Court arising from the Jigna police’s failure to enforce a civil “status quo” order.

🏛️ Understanding “Status Quo” and Contempt

In legal terms, a Status Quo order is a directive to keep things exactly as they are until the court makes a final decision. When a party begins new construction (like the drainage and door mentioned) despite this order, they are in direct violation.

When the police—the primary enforcement arm of the state—fail to act or remain “mute spectators,” it is often interpreted as willful negligence or complicity. In India, this can trigger:

• Civil Contempt: Disobedience of any judgment, decree, or order of a court.
• Criminal Contempt: Any act that lowers the authority of the court or interferes with the administration of justice.

---

📉 The “Inconsistency” Problem

The complainant points to a series of reports from the SSP Mirzapur (dated May 2, June 4, and July 14, 2025) that allegedly contradict one another. This “competency deficit” is a critical legal lever:

• Section 182 IPC: If an official knowingly provides false information to mislead the government.
• Section 177 IPC: Furnishing false information by a public servant.
• Section 211 IPC: False charge of offense made with intent to injure.

Legal Note: Under Section 195 of the CrPC, a court generally cannot take cognizance of these IPC offenses except on the written complaint of the public servant concerned or their superior. This is why the complainant is escalating the matter to the Joint Secretary and the Chief Minister’s Office.

---

🛠️ Escalation Matrix for Such Grievances

If you are tracking this case or a similar one, the standard legal escalation in Uttar Pradesh follows this path:

Level	Authority	Primary Action
Local	SHO Jigna / SSP Mirzapur	Filing of FIR or Status Report
Administrative	IGRS (Jansunwai) / CM Office	High-level review and “marking” of the file
Judicial	Civil Court / Allahabad High Court	Filing a Contempt Petition or Writ of Mandamus
Oversight	Police Complaints Authority (PCA)	Reporting “Abuse of Power” or “Non-performance

Current Status of the Case

The grievance (Registration: GOVUP/E/2025/0085719) is currently with the Chief Minister Secretariat and has been forwarded to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary). This suggests that the local police’s “arbitrary closure” of previous complaints is being scrutinized at the state capital level.

To help you escalate this grievance regarding the alleged contempt of court and police inaction in Mirzapur, here are the verified contact details for the relevant public authorities.

🏛️ High-Level State Authorities (Lucknow)

These officials oversee the grievance redressal system (IGRS) and can intervene if local reports are found to be misleading.

Office / Name	Designation	Mobile/Phone	Email Address
Shri Arvind Mohan	Joint Secretary (CM Office)	0522-2226350	arvind.12574@gov.in
CM Helpline	Public Grievance	1076	jansunwai-up@gov.in
Yogi Adityanath	Chief Minister, UP	0522-2236838	cmup@nic.in

---

👮 Mirzapur Police Administration

If the local Jigna police are unresponsive, these senior officers are responsible for the conduct of their subordinates.

Name / Rank	Designation	Mobile (CUG)	Email Address
Somen Barma	DIG/SSP Mirzapur	9454400299	spmzr-up@nic.in
Nitesh Singh	Addl. SP (City)	9454401104	asp-city.mi@up.gov.in
Amar Bahadur	CO Lalganj (Jurisdiction)	9454401592	co-lalganj.mi@up.gov.in
Inspector Jigna	SHO, Jigna Police Station	9454404006	–

---

⚖️ District Administration & Anti-Corruption

For matters involving civil orders or allegations of corruption:

• District Magistrate, Mirzapur:
  • Phone: 9454417567 / 05442-252480
  • Email: dmmir@nic.in
• Anti-Corruption Unit (Mirzapur Division):
  • Mobile: 9454402487
  • Email: aco-mirzapur.mi@up.gov.in

---

🌐 Key Web Links

• UP IGRS (Jansunwai) Portal: jansunwai.up.nic.in — Use this to track the status of your existing registration numbers: GOVUP/E/2025/0085719.
• Mirzapur District Official Site: mirzapur.nic.in
• UP Police Official Directory: uppolice.gov.in

Pro-Tip: When emailing, always mention your specific registration numbers and attach the Civil Court Order (Status Quo) and Photographs of the new construction to prove the contempt.

Would you like me to draft a concise “Letter of Dissatisfaction” that you can copy and email to the Joint Secretary or the DM?