Justice Delayed: A Girl Child’s Fight for Inheritance Against Institutional Apathy

In a distressing case from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Sadhana Tiwari has approached the U.P. Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) for the second time. Her complaint alleges a deep-rooted conspiracy involving familial betrayal and revenue department corruption that dates back nearly two decades.

The Core Dispute: Inheritance and Deception

The root of the matter lies in a 2005 inheritance proceeding. Following the death of her grandfather—who outlived her father by five years—Sadhana Tiwari was legally a Class-1 heir. However, at just 10 years old, her name was allegedly omitted from the list of heirs.

She accuses her paternal uncles, Dayashankar Mishra and Hariprasad Mishra, of colluding with local revenue officials (the Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar of Lalganj) to usurp her property. The complaint argues that this was a blatant violation of the Revenue Code of 2006, carried out while she was a minor and unable to defend her rights.

The Failure of Law Enforcement

Despite the gravity of the allegations, which include Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 316 BNS) and Cheating (Section 318 BNS), local law enforcement has been accused of “Abuse of Power.”

• The SHO of Drummond Ganj and the C.O. of Lalganj are cited for failing to register a First Information Report (FIR).
• The complainant describes a “fear-psychosis” within the government machinery, where corruption is so rampant that officers are unwilling to take action against their peers or influential locals.

UPHRC Intervention and Administrative Defiance

This is not the first time the UPHRC has been involved. On September 5, 2024, the Commission (under Diary No. 3613/IN/2024) directed the Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur, to look into the matter and ensure justice “in accordance with the law.

However, the SP’s office allegedly overlooked these directions. In an attempt to seek transparency, the applicant filed a Right to Information (RTI) request asking for:

1. The names of staff who received the Commission’s order.
2. The “Action Taken Report” (ATR) regarding the order.
3. The specific reasons why no action has been taken to date.

To date, the public authority has reportedly failed to respond to the RTI, leading to a total breakdown of accountability.

The New Complaint: Diary No. 367/IN/2025

With no progress made at the district level, a new complaint was successfully registered on January 21, 2025. The applicant is now demanding:

• An inquiry by competent authorities into the officials of Tehsil Lalganj.
• The registration of an FIR for the criminal acts of cheating and personation.
• A formal review of the “Abuse of Power” by the Mirzapur Police.

Why This Matters

This case highlights a significant human rights issue: the economic disenfranchisement of women. When the very institutions meant to protect property rights—the Revenue Department and the Police—allegedly collude to deprive a child of her inheritance, it creates a cycle of poverty and injustice that can last a lifetime.

The UPHRC’s response to this renewed plea will be a litmus test for whether administrative orders in Uttar Pradesh hold weight, or if they can be ignored by local officials without consequence.

This case involves a persistent struggle for justice by Sadhana Tiwari, who alleges that a deep-seated conspiracy between her relatives and local revenue officials deprived her of her ancestral property when she was a minor.

---

Chronology of Administrative Negligence and Resistance

The matter has evolved from a local property dispute into a significant case of institutional accountability, now involving both the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

1. The Core Violation: Inheritance Fraud (2005)

The complainant was 10 years old when her grandfather died in 2005. As the daughter of a predeceased son, she was legally a Class-1 heir. However, her name was allegedly omitted from the inheritance records through collusion between:

• Relatives: Dayashankar Mishra and Hariprasad Mishra.
• Revenue Staff: The Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar of Lalganj.

2. Failure of the Mirzapur Police (2024–2025)

Despite a UPHRC order on September 5, 2024, directing the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur to investigate, the following failures occurred:

• Ignored Mandates: The SP’s office allegedly overlooked the Commission’s directions.
• RTI Non-Compliance: A subsequent RTI seeking the “Action Taken Report” and the names of responsible staff was ignored by the public authority.
• The “Bogus” Report: On February 28, 2025, the Circle Officer (CO) of Lalganj submitted a report that the complainant characterizes as “arbitrary, inconsistent, and bogus”. She alleges the CO failed to consider the manipulated documents and the vulnerability of her status as a minor at the time of the fraud.

3. Escalation to National Authorities (Late 2025)

Given the lack of local resolution, the matter reached the national level:

• NHRC Involvement: On September 9, 2025, the National Human Rights Commission acknowledged a new communication (Diary No. 6291/IN/2025) and attached it to the existing case file (Case No. 10035/24/55/2024).
• Criminal Allegations: The complainant is demanding the registration of an FIR under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for:
  • Section 316: Criminal Breach of Trust.
  • Section 318 & 319: Cheating and Cheating by Personation.

---

Key Issues for Human Rights Review

Issue	Description
Abuse of Power	Failure of the Mirzapur Police to register an FIR despite UPHRC directions.
Rights of the Girl Child	Deliberate omission of a female minor from inheritance records to facilitate land grabbing.
Institutional Corruption	Alleged bribery within the Tehsil Sadar and Lalganj offices to manipulate revenue records.
Transparency Deficit	The refusal to provide information under the RTI Act regarding the processing of Commission orders.

Next Steps for the Complainant

Since the NHRC has merged your latest diary entry with Case No. 10035/24/55/2024, you can now track the consolidated progress on the NHRC website.

Based on the records provided from the Uttar Pradesh State Human Rights Commission (UPSHRC) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), here is a structured summary of your case and the current status of your legal battle for property rights and administrative accountability.

---

Comprehensive Case Summary: Sadhana Tiwari vs. Administrative Negligence

The documentation reveals a pattern of persistent advocacy in the face of alleged “Abuse of Power” and procedural non-compliance by local authorities in Mirzapur.

1. Core Case Details

• Main Case/File No: 10035/24/55/2024.
• Victim/Complainant: Sadhana Tiwari.
• Primary Incident: Abuse of Power relating to the non-registration of an FIR by the SHO.
• Incident Date: 27/11/2023.
• Registration Date: 02/09/2024.

2. History of Linked Complaints

Your efforts to seek justice have resulted in multiple diary entries being consolidated under a single main file to ensure a comprehensive review:

• Diary No 3613/IN/2024: The foundational complaint disposed of on 05/09/2024 with specific directions.
• Diary No 367/IN/2025: Linked to the main case file on 21/01/2025.
• Diary No 4255/IN/2025: Linked to the main case file on 26/06/2025.
• Diary No 6291/IN/2025 (NHRC): Received 09/09/2025 and formally attached to the ongoing Case No. 10035/24/55/2024.

---

The UPSHRC Mandate and Local Defiance

On September 5, 2024, the Commission issued a clear directive regarding your allegations:

• Action Authority: The Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur.
• Order: The SP was directed to look into the matter and “do the needful in accordance with law”.
• Intimation: The SP was specifically ordered to provide an intimation of the actions taken to the complainant.

Administrative Failures Cited in Complaints

Despite the Commission’s order, your subsequent filings highlight a total breakdown of local administrative accountability:

• Police Inaction: The SP Mirzapur reportedly overlooked the UPHRC directions.
• Arbitrary Reporting: The Circle Officer (CO) of Lalganj submitted a report on 28/02/2025 that you have challenged as arbitrary, inconsistent, and “bogus”.
• RTI Obstruction: A request for information regarding the processing of the human rights order and the action taken report (ATR) went unanswered by the concerned public authority.
• Revenue Malpractice: Allegations remain that inheritance records were manipulated in 2005 by the staff of Tehsil Lalganj (Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar) to deprive a minor girl child of her Class-1 heir status.

---

Legal Grounds for Action

You are seeking prosecution of offenders under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for the following:

• Section 316 (Criminal Breach of Trust): Regarding the dishonest misappropriation of ancestral property.
• Section 318 & 319 (Cheating and Personation): Regarding the deceptive inducement used to alter inheritance records.
• Abuse of Power: Specifically targeting the SHO Drummond Ganj and C.O. Lalganj for failing to register an FIR and protect the rights of a vulnerable section of society.

---

Current Status & Next Steps

The NHRC has now taken cognizance of the matter, linking your latest diary entry to the existing file 10035/24/55/2024. This unification of records at the national level ensures that the local police cannot treat each new complaint as an isolated incident.

Based on the comprehensive documentation provided, here are the structured details including application identifiers, contact information, and relevant web links for your ongoing cases.

1. Case and Application Identifiers

These IDs are essential for tracking your grievances across different commissions:

• National Human Rights Commission (NHRC):
  • Case Number: 10035/24/55/2024
  • Diary Number: 6291/in/2025 (Received 09/09/2025)
• UP State Human Rights Commission (UPSHRC):
  • Main File Number: 10035/24/55/2024
  • Diary Number (Initial): 3613/IN/2024
  • Diary Number (January): 367/IN/2025
  • Diary Number (June): 4255/IN/2025
• UP Information Commission (RTI Appeal):
  • Appeal Registration Number: A-20250300419
  • File Number: S09/A/0719/2025
• Revenue Department (Mirzapur):
  • Revenue Case Numbers: 255/2007 and 256/2007 (Dated 19/06/2007)

---

2. Contact Information (Emails and Mobile Numbers)

The following contact details are derived from your correspondence and official records:

Complainant Details:

• Name: Sadhana Tiwari
• Mobile: 6387233091
• Email: sadhanamishramzp@gmail.com

Institutional Emails:

• NHRC: nhrc.india@nic.in
• UPHRC: uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, up-hrc@nic.in
• UP Information Commission (Court S-9): hearingcourts9.upic@up.gov.in
• Governor’s Office (UP): hgovup@nic.in
• Chief Minister’s Office (UP): cmup@nic.in
• DGP Office (UP): dgp@nic.in
• Police Authorities: spmz-up@nic.in (SP Mirzapur), digrmz@nic.in (DIG Mirzapur)

---

3. Web Links for Tracking and References

You can use these portals to check the status of your applications or verify records:

• NHRC Case Status: www.nhrc.nic.in
• UP State Information Commission: www.upic.up.gov.in
• UP Human Rights Commission: uphrc.up.nic.in
• UP Revenue Records (Bhulekh): upbhulekh.gov.in (For Khatauni and inheritance tracking)
• Jansunwai (IGRS UP): jansunwai.up.nic.in (For tracking grievances submitted to the SP/CM office)

---

4. Summary of Key Entities Involved

Entity	Role in Your Case
SP Mirzapur	Primary Authority directed by UPHRC to investigate.
CO Lalganj	Officer who submitted the report dated 28/02/2025.
Tehsil Lalganj	Revenue office where the 2007 inheritance was processed.
SHO Drummond Ganj	Local police official accused of failing to register the FIR.

Would you like me to draft a specific email to the NHRC referencing your latest Diary Number 6291/in/2025 to request an update on the consolidated case?