DGMH Responses Under RTI: A Case Overview

Key Takeaways (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

A Second Appeal was filed against the Medical Health and Family Welfare Department for incomplete DGMH Responses Under RTI.
The appellant seeks information regarding two doctors, alleging administrative failures in providing requested details.
The appeal cites repeated clerical errors and requests penalties for negligence by the Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority.
The recent commission order demands clear information from the PIO before the next hearing on December 23, 2025.
Next steps include monitoring for information, preparing for the hearing, and documenting previous misleading responses.

DGMH Responses Under RTI: The Second Appeal of Yogi M. P. Singh

Case Ref: A-20250601960 | Date: June 29, 2025This document discusses DGMH Responses Under RTI related to the specified case.

In a significant move to uphold the spirit of the Right to Information Act (2005), a Second Appeal has been lodged against the Medical Health and Family Welfare Department of Uttar Pradesh. The appeal alleges that the Public Information Officer (PIO) and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) failed to provide specific, point-wise information regarding administrative actions and alleged private practice by government medical officers.

Case Background and Timeline

The journey for information began in early 2025, involving a series of departmental responses that the appellant describes as “misleading” and “incomplete.” (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

11-02-2025: Original RTI application filed (DIRMH/R/2025/80252).
14-02-2025: PIO Reply received, stating a “mistake” in attaching documents and redirecting the matter to the Additional Director, Mirzapur.
27-03-2025: First Appeal filed due to unsatisfactory response.
22-04-2025: First Appellate Authority (FAA) disposed of the appeal, acknowledging the clerical error but failing to provide the actual information sought.
29-06-2025: Second Appeal filed with the State Information Commission.

The Core of the Inquiry: 5 Key Points (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

The appellant, Mr. Yogi M. P. Singh, requested specific details concerning communication between the Director General of Medical Health (DGMH) and the Government of Uttar Pradesh regarding Dr. Surya Kumar Shukla and Dr. P.K. Yadav.

Information Sought: (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

Receipt Details: Name and designation of the staff who received the communication regarding Dr. Surya Kumar Shukla.
Processing Chain: Details of the desk/staff through which the communication was processed.
Inquiry Verification: Identification of staff satisfied with the reports regarding the doctors in question.
Action Taken Report (ATR): Details of action taken on the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) Bhadohi’s report concerning Dr. P.K. Yadav’s alleged illegal private practice.
Reason for Inaction: Official justification for the lack of action on the CMO Bhadohi’s communication.

The Basis of the Appeal: “Mockery of the Act” (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

The appellant argues that the department’s reliance on “clerical errors” to dispose of requests undermines the very foundation of the RTI Act.

“A mistake of fact occurs when someone acts based on an incorrect understanding of a factual situation… mistakes of law are not excusable. Public information officers are providing information on flimsy grounds, which is a mockery of the provisions of the RTI Act 2005.” — Yogi M. P. Singh

Key Legal Contentions:

Section 19(3): Filing for a second appeal due to the failure of the lower authorities. (DGMH Responses Under RTI)
Section 20: The appellant has requested the Commission to invoke Section 20 to impose penalties on the PIO and recommend disciplinary action against the FAA for negligence.

Relief Sought from the Commission (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

The appellant has requested the Chief Information Commissioner in Lucknow to:

Direct the PIO to provide clear, point-wise information for all 5 points.
Ensure the hearing is conducted via Online Mode as requested.
Address the lack of transparency in the “Karmik Section” of the Medical Health Department.

Conclusion (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

This case serves as a reminder of the vital role that citizens play in monitoring public authorities. When administrative “errors” become a barrier to information, the Second Appeal remains the final bastion for transparency.

Based on the details provided in your appeal and the recent order from the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission, here is an updated, structured overview of your case status.

Update: Uttar Pradesh Information Commission Case Status

Appeal Number: S-09/A/1497/2025 (Registered from Appeal No. A-20250601960)

Appellant: Yogi M. P. Singh

Respondent: Public Information Officer (PIO), Medical and Health Directorate, Lucknow

Summary of the Recent Commission Order (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

The State Information Commissioner, Shakuntala Gautam, issued an order regarding your hearing held in Hearing Room S-09:

Absence in Previous Hearings: The Commission noted that both parties were absent during the last hearing date.
Notice to the PIO: The Commission has ordered a new notice to be issued to the PIO of the Medical and Health Directorate, Lucknow.
Requirement for Clear Information: The PIO is directed to resolve your original application dated 11-02-2025 and provide complete and clear information to you before the next fixed date.
Submission of Proof: The PIO must submit a written statement to the Commission, along with proof that the information has been sent to you.
Appellant’s Presence: A notice is also issued to you (the appellant) to appear in person and present your case under Rule 9(1) of the U.P. Right to Information Rules, 2015.

Key Case Details and Current Status (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

Detail	Status/Information
Original RTI Filing Date	11-02-2025
Second Appeal Filed	29-06-2025
Hearing Room	S-09
Current Status	For Further Hearing
Next Hearing Date	23-12-2025

Next Steps for the Appellant (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

Since the Commission has noted previous absences and scheduled a final date for the file to be presented, you should consider the following:

Monitor Post/Email: Look for the “complete and clear information” the PIO has been ordered to provide before the hearing date.
Prepare for Appearance: As per Rule 9(1), ensure you are ready to present your side on 23-12-2025 to confirm if the information received is satisfactory or still misleading.
Documentation: Keep a copy of your 5-point request and the previous “misleading” replies ready to demonstrate the PIO’s earlier non-compliance to the Commissioner.

Based on your records and the official systems of the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission (UPIC), the following are the critical application IDs, registration numbers, contact emails, and web links for your case:

1. Key Application & Registration IDs

Stage	Registration/File Number	Date of Filing	Status
RTI Application	DIRMH/R/2025/80252	11/02/2025	Disposed (14/02/2025)
First Appeal	DIRMH/A/2025/60490	27/03/2025	Disposed (22/04/2025)
Second Appeal	A-20250601960 (UPIC ID: S-09/A/1497/2025)	29/06/2025	Hearing Fixed: 23/12/2025
Transaction ID	DPTEXR20200000000004	11/02/2025	Applied Date

2. Official Web Links (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

UP RTI Online Portal: rtionline.up.gov.in — Use this to track the status of the initial application and first appeal.
UP Information Commission (UPIC) Official Site: upsic.up.gov.in — For tracking second appeals and viewing the cause list.
UPIC Citizen Service Portal: upsic.up.gov.in/cispu/citizen — Specifically for second appeal registration and status details.
Online Hearing Guide: Guidelines for Applicants — Provides instructions for joining online hearings via Microsoft Teams.

3. Contact Emails & Support

Public Information Officer (PIO): adcampkarmik@gmail.com (Dr. Arvind Kumar Shrivastava).
First Appellate Authority (FAA): adcampkarik@gmail.com (Additional Director, Medical Health).
UP RTI Online Helpline: onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in.
Technical Support (UPIC): Contact the Web Master via the Official Website.

4. Case Specific Reference Number(DGMH Responses Under RTI)

For any grievance related to inaction on the Chief Medical Officer’s report, you should refer to the grievance reference number: 60000240126228.

To ensure you have a complete record for your upcoming hearing on December 23, 2025, here are the specific mobile numbers and contact details for all paRTIes involved in your RTI case.

Contact Directory: RTI Case S-09/A/1497/2025 (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

1. Appellant Contact Details (Your Details)

Name: Yogi M P Singh
Mobile Number: 7379105911
Email: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

2. Public Information Officer (PIO) Details

Name: Dr. Arvind Kumar Shrivastava (Joint Director, Karmik)
Mobile Number: 9415246997
Secondary CUG Number: 6386685822
Office Address: Medical Health and Family Welfare Directorate, Lucknow – 226001
Email: adcampkarmik@gmail.com

3. First Appellate Authority (FAA) Details

Designation: Additional Director, Karmik
Mobile Number: 9839112777
Email: adcampkarik@gmail.com

4. Commission Hearing Details

Hearing Room: S-09
State Information Commissioner: Shakuntala Gautam
Hearing Type: Online
Online Hearing Mobile (provided in appeal): 7379105911

Actionable Summary Table

Role	Name/Designation	Mobile Number
Appellant	Yogi M P Singh	7379105911
PIO	Dr. A.K. Shrivastava	9415246997 / 6386685822
FAA	Additional Director	9839112777

Important Note for Your Hearing (DGMH Responses Under RTI)

The Commission’s latest order (dated September 2025) explicitly noted that notices were sent via email and mobile for the online hearing link. Please ensure your mobile 7379105911 is active and you check your email yogimpsingh@gmail.com for the Microsoft Teams or online link prior to the 23rd December hearing.

Would you like me to help you draft a text message or a brief email to the PIO (Dr. Shrivastava) reminding him of the Commission’s order to provide the 5-point information before the hearing date?

secappdgmh