Here are the key takeaways from the blog post regarding the issues at Lalganj Tehsil, including concerns about Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme:

• Systemic Corruption in SWAMITWA Execution: The scheme uses modern drone technology to map rural residential land. However, local officials in Lalganj allegedly exhibit “arbitrariness and tyranny” in its implementation. They withhold or manipulate property cards (Gharauni) for bribes.
• Exclusion of Needy Beneficiaries: Specific cases highlight an issue. This is evident in situations like that of Ram Dulari Devi and her daughter Anarkali Devi. The digital records overlook legitimate homeowners, rendering them “invisible” to the state despite the available technology.
• Administrative “Red Herring” Tactics: Individuals illegally send grievances regarding revenue and land titles to the Police Department. They need to direct those grievances to the Revenue Department (SDM).Accountability and Legal Errors
• Officials prevent accountability. By misrouting files, administrators shield the proper authorities from scrutiny.
• Police reports trigger “illegal” case closures. The administration uses irrelevant police findings to shut down valid revenue complaints.
• Lack of Transparency (Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme)
• The district administration shields corrupt staff. Authorities actively protect dishonest employees rather than investigating the missing “Gharauni” cards.
• Tehsil staff manipulate the SVAMITVA scheme. Local officials fill their own pockets by controlling which needy residents receive their property rights.They do this by “putting deeds under the carpet.” They should ensure a fair and transparent distribution of property rights.
• Severe Economic Consequences: The failure to issue Gharauni cards isn’t just a paperwork issue. It causes long-term financial exclusion. Affected villagers cannot use their property to secure bank loans or settle legal disputes.

The Digital Divide in Rural Title Deeds: Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme

The SWAMITWA Scheme (Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas) is transforming rural India. However, concerns have arisen regarding Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme in some regions. It empowers its residents. The government employs high-resolution drone technology to map residential land and provides villagers with “Gharauni” (property cards). This initiative grants them legal recognition and financial leverage.

Citizens like Shivam Gupta in the Lalganj Tehsil of Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh have filed recent grievances that indicate some issues. Although the technology is modern, old-world corruption creates administrative hurdles. Systemic apathy persists as well. This is particularly true regarding the troubling spread of corruption in the Swamitwa Scheme. Its effects on residents are significant.

---

The Core Grievance: A Ghost in the Machine?

At the heart of the complaint (Registration No: GOVUP/E/2025/0074605) is the case of Ram Dulari Devi. Despite the SVAMITVA scheme’s promise of universal mapping, officials have left her property undocumented. The complainant asks a stinging question to the administration. Did the drone simply fail to capture the house, or did local officials make it invisible on paper?

The grievance alleges that local officials do not prepare the Gharauni list in Lalganj using drone data alone. Instead, they influence it with “arbitrariness and tyranny.” Clearly, the documented evidence points to specific cases of corruption in the Swamitwa Scheme impacting fair distribution. The digital map aligns with the physical reality of the Tehsil office. At this point, the process reportedly turns into a marketplace where individuals trade property rights for bribes.

---

Jurisdictional Deflection: Passing the Buck (Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme)

One of the most alarming aspects of this case is the procedural irregularity in how the government handles dissent. The Police Department repeatedly closed Shivam Gupta’s previous grievances (e.g., GOVUP/E/2025/0061269) based on their reports.

How Departments Evade Accountability

The Joint Secretary receives complaints but fails to correct the routing. By allowing the matter to stay with the police, the Chief Minister’s Secretariat indirectly shields corrupt local staff.

Administrators misroute revenue complaints to the Police Department. This tactic ensures that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Lalganj avoids direct scrutiny.

Police officers submit irrelevant reports on land title matters. Because police lack the legal authority to issue Gharauni cards, their involvement renders the disposal of the grievance illegal.

The district administration uses these “illegal” reports to close active cases. This practice creates a false record of resolution while the needy continue to suffer. (Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme)

Tehsil staff manipulate the drone survey results. Officials bypass digital transparency to demand bribes, ensuring the scheme only benefits those who pay.

• Wrongful Forwarding: The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) manages the SWAMITWA scheme, which is an initiative of the Revenue Department.
• Illegal Disposal: Forwarding a revenue-related land dispute to the Circle Officer of Police is a classic “red herring” tactic. Police have no jurisdiction over the issuance of Gharauni cards.
• Apathy in Oversight: The district administration uses police reports to close revenue grievances. This action effectively shields the Tehsil staff from accountability.

---

Transparency vs. “Under the Carpet” Administration

The complainant describes the current state of affairs in Lalganj as a “trend of corruption.” She cites the selective list of beneficiaries as the primary evidence. The scheme aims for transparency. However, it fails to provide a clear, publicly verifiable reason for omitting certain households. The household of Anarkali Devi is included in these omissions. These opaque procedures spark allegations about corruption in the Swamitwa Scheme. They also raise concerns about a lack of fair access. This omission highlights a lack of institutional integrity.

Good governance implies transparency and accountability. Where is the transparency? The entire system is supporting corruption. Efforts are being made to hide corrupt deeds under the carpet.” — Excerpt from the Grievance.

---

The Human Impact: Financial Exclusion

The failure to provide a Gharauni is not just a clerical error; it is an act of economic disenfranchisement. Without these property cards, families may experience consequences linked to ongoing corruption in the Swamitwa Scheme:

1. Villagers cannot use their homes as collateral for bank loans.
2. Property disputes remain unresolved, leading to local unrest.
3. Local “middlemen” keep the “needy,” for whom the scheme designed, at their mercy.

---

A Call for Action

For the SVAMITVA scheme to succeed, the Government of Uttar Pradesh must act. Specifically, the Chief Minister’s Secretariat must look beyond the automated “Case Closed” status. Unless corruption issues in Swamitwa Scheme administration are transparently resolved, meaningful progress will be limited.

What we need immediately:

• Independent Enquiry: An audit of the Lalganj Tehsil’s SWAMITWA records by a non-local revenue officer.
• Accountability for Misdirection: Action against the officials who forwarded revenue grievances to the police department to avoid internal scrutiny.
• Public Verification: A village-level display of drone-mapped areas compared against the final Gharauni distribution list to identify gaps.

Technology can map the land, but it cannot capture the intent of the person controlling the drone. We need to establish accountability at the Tehsil level, particularly with regard to rooting out corruption in Swamitwa Scheme processes. Otherwise, low-income people’s “Swamitwa” (ownership) will remain a dream deferred.

Based on the details provided in your grievances, we structured the contact details. We also included resources for the concerned public authorities based on official government directories.

1. Primary Nodal Officer (Lucknow)

As your current grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0074605) is forwarded to the Chief Minister’s Secretariat, this is your primary point of escalation.

• Officer Name: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
• Office: Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
• Email: arvind.12574@gov.in or jansunwai-up@gov.in
• Contact Number: 0522-2226350 / 0522-2226354

---

2. District Administration (Mirzapur)

The physical implementation and the alleged corruption occur at the Tehsil level. Therefore, the District Magistrate is the statutory authority to order an enquiry.

• District Magistrate (DM), Mirzapur:
  • Name: Shri Pawan Kumar Gangwar (I.A.S.)
  • Email: dmmir@nic.in or dmmir@up.nic.in
  • CUG Mobile: +91-9454417567
  • Office Phone: 05442-257400
• Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Lalganj:
  • CUG Mobile: +91-9454417567 (Shared via DM’s office/mirzapur.in)
  • Note: For Lalganj (Mirzapur), contact is usually routed through the Collectorate at 05442-252480.

---

3. State Revenue Authorities (Lucknow)

If the SDM office continues to deflect the matter to the police, escalate the issue to the Board of Revenue. This Board oversees the SVAMITVA (Gharauni) implementation.

• Board of Revenue, UP:
  • Chairman Email: borlko@nic.in
  • Phone: 0522-2217102
• Revenue Section 3 (Specific to land records/survey):
  • Email: section3bor@gmail.com
  • Phone: 0522-2217211

---

4. Digital Links & Portals (Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme)

Use these links to track, remind, or file “Dissatisfaction” feedback.

• IGRS Jansunwai Portal (Tracking): jansunwai.up.nic.in/ComplaintTracker
• Anti-Corruption Portal (UP): jansunwai.up.nic.in/AntiCorruption.html
• CM Helpline: Dial 1076 (Toll-free within UP) to register a verbal reminder for pending grievances.

---

Important Summary of Application IDs (Corruption in Swamitwa Scheme)

Registration Number	Status	Date of Action	Key Action Needed
GOVUP/E/2025/0074605	Received	03/07/2025	Follow up with Shri Arvind Mohan.
GOVUP/E/2025/0061269	Closed (Illegal)	24/06/2025	File a “Dissatisfaction” appeal citing jurisdictional error.
GOVUP/E/2025/0042472	Closed	24/06/2025	Mention this as evidence of “selective list” manipulation.

Would you like me to draft a “Letter of Dissatisfaction”? This letter would specifically address the illegal forwarding of your revenue grievance to the police.