The following are the key takeaways from the analysis of the grievance regarding the SVAMITVA scheme in Tehsil Lalganj:

1. Systematic Exclusion of the Needy

The core issue is that despite the use of objective drone technology, the “human element” (local Tehsil staff) is allegedly manipulating the results. Families like that of Ram Dulari Devi and Anarkali Devi have been left out of the property card distribution, despite being legitimate residents. This suggests that the drone’s data is being filtered or altered by corrupt officials before the final cards are issued.

2. Failure of Administrative Accountability

There is a significant breakdown in the “Ground Truthing” phase of the scheme. According to guidelines, officials must verify structures on the ground and address objections. In Lalganj, the grievance suggests:

• Lack of Transparency: Lists are being prepared and finalized without proper public consultation.
• Arbitrary Selection: The list of beneficiaries in Village Dubar Kalan appears selective rather than comprehensive, favoring some while ignoring others.

3. Economic and Legal Disempowerment

The exclusion from the SVAMITVA scheme has real-world consequences for rural citizens:

• Financial Blockage: Without a Gharauni (property card), residents cannot access formal bank loans or credit.
• Ownership Insecurity: Lack of legal documentation leaves the poor vulnerable to land grabbing and long-term legal disputes.

4. Erosion of Government Trust

The “tyranny” and “corruption” at the Tehsil level are not just administrative failures; they are political liabilities. The grievance emphasizes that such local malpractice maligns the image of the Uttar Pradesh government, making high-tech state welfare schemes appear inaccessible or fraudulent to the common mass.

5. Call for Higher-Level Intervention

The grievance bypasses local officials—who are the subjects of the complaint—and appeals directly to the Joint Secretary in Lucknow. This highlights a lack of faith in the local Mirzapur administration to self-correct, necessitating a high-level independent inquiry into the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) and their subordinates.

The Digital Divide: Why the SVAMITVA Scheme is Failing the Needy in Lalganj

The SVAMITVA Scheme (Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas) was launched with a revolutionary promise: to use cutting-edge drone technology to provide rural residents with a “Gharauni” (property card). This legal document is meant to be a tool of empowerment, allowing villagers to secure bank loans, prove ownership, and protect their ancestral land from encroachment.

However, in Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur, the gap between policy and practice has become a chasm. While the technology is high-tech, the human element—specifically the local revenue administration—is allegedly mired in old-world corruption and arbitrary decision-making.

---

The Ghost in the Machine: When Drones Can’t “See” the Poor

The SVAMITVA scheme relies on drone mapping to ensure every residential structure is accounted for. This process is designed to be objective and transparent. Yet, a formal grievance (Registration No: GOVUP/E/2025/0042472) filed by Shivam Gupta highlights a disturbing anomaly.

The house of Ram Dulari Devi (wife of Ram Dular Bhujwa) and her daughter Anarkali Devi was somehow excluded from the distribution of property cards. This raises a fundamental question: If the drone sees all, why did the tehsil staff fail to document this specific household? The complainant argues that the technology is being bypassed by human interference. When staff manipulate records or selectively omit residents, the transparency promised by the central government is effectively neutralized.

Direct vs. Circumstantial Evidence of Corruption

The grievance identifies a “trend of corruption” that is supported by both direct and circumstantial evidence. In Lalganj, the evidence lies in the selectivity of the lists.

By looking at the distributed details in Village Dubar Kalan, we see a list of residents who have received their cards—ranging from areas of 10 sq. meters to 178 sq. meters. However, the omission of long-standing residents like Ram Dulari Devi suggests that the list is not comprehensive, but rather “selective.”

In administrative terms, this is often a red flag for gatekeeping, where local officials may demand informal “fees” or use their positions of power to decide who gets a legal identity and who remains invisible to the state.

The Human Cost: A Legacy of Economic Instability

For the family of Anarkali Devi, the lack of a Gharauni is not just a missing piece of paper; it is a denial of economic rights. Without a property card:

• Access to Credit is Blocked: They cannot approach formal banking institutions for loans.
• Legal Vulnerability: Without a card, the family remains at the mercy of property disputes and local land mafias.
• Generational Impact: The struggle started with Ram Dulari Devi and has now passed down to her daughter, demonstrating how bureaucratic apathy can trap families in a cycle of insecurity.

A Blow to the Government’s Image

The complainant notes a critical political reality: the “tyranny of tehsil staff” is maligning the image of the Uttar Pradesh government. While the state leadership pushes for digital transformation and rural development, the ground-level execution in Lalganj tells a story of arbitrariness and lack of accountability.

When the “needy” are excluded while the “connected” receive their benefits, the public’s faith in digital governance erodes. The grievance explicitly calls for an enquiry against the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Lalganj, suggesting that the rot may not just be at the bottom, but within the supervisory levels of the tehsil.

---

Conclusion: The Need for an Immediate Audit

The SVAMITVA scheme is a landmark initiative, but its success in Mirzapur depends on more than just drones. It requires a rigorous audit of the Lalganj Tehsil records.

The grievance forwarded to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) represents a cry for justice from the residents of Dubar Kalan. If the government is serious about “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas,” it must ensure that the “Gharauni” reaches every doorstep—not just those who can navigate the corrupt corridors of the local tehsil.

The SVAMITVA scheme (Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas) is governed by a set of formal frameworks designed to ensure transparency. When these guidelines are ignored at the Tehsil level, it leads to the specific grievances you’ve highlighted, such as the exclusion of legitimate households.

To “put light” on these guidelines, it is helpful to understand the mandatory steps that local staff must follow:

---

1. The Multi-Stage Implementation Process

The scheme is not just about drones; it is a legal process with specific checkpoints where transparency is supposed to be guaranteed.

• Pre-Survey (Demarcation): Before the drone flies, the Tehsil staff (Lekhpal/Patwari) and Gram Panchayat must mark property boundaries on the ground using Chuna (lime powder). This must be done in the presence of the owners.
• Drone Survey: The Survey of India (SoI) captures high-resolution images.
• Ground Truthing & Verification: This is where most “arbitrariness” occurs. Officials are required to go door-to-door with the draft map to verify ownership against existing records or physical possession.
• Objection Management: A draft map must be published. Residents have a fixed window (usually 15–30 days) to file objections if their names are missing or boundaries are wrong.

---

2. Eligibility and Inclusion Criteria

According to the Ministry of Panchayati Raj guidelines:

• Scope: The scheme covers all residential “Abadi” (inhabited) land in rural areas.
• Entitlement: Any person in physical possession of a house in the Abadi area as of the cut-off date (usually the date of the survey notification) is eligible for a property card.
• The “Drone Evidence” Rule: If a house exists on the ground, it must be captured by the drone and assigned a unique ID. Excluding a visible house like that of Ram Dulari Devi is a direct violation of the technical guidelines.

---

3. Roles and Responsibilities of Tehsil Staff

The guidelines place heavy accountability on the local Revenue Department:

• Inquiry Officer: Usually an official appointed by the District Magistrate/Collector. They are legally responsible for resolving ownership disputes during the “Inquiry Process.”
• Data Accuracy: The Tehsil staff is responsible for providing the “Namanu” (alphanumeric data like names and father’s names) to be linked with the GIS maps.
• Final Approval: The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) or Tehsildar must sign off on the final “Record of Rights” before the property card is generated.

---

4. Redressal Mechanism for “Arbitrariness”

If the guidelines are not followed, the framework provides for:

1. District Monitoring Committee: Chaired by the District Magistrate (DM), this committee is supposed to oversee the Tehsil’s performance and handle systemic corruption.
2. Legal Recourse: The property card (Gharauni) is a legal document. Under the U.P. Revenue Code, if an owner is excluded, they can appeal to the Revenue Court or the DM to have the records corrected (Mutation/Correction of Records).

Summary of Key Guidelines

Feature	Guideline Requirement
Transparency	Gram Sabha must be held before the survey to inform all villagers.
Accountability	Inquiry Officers must resolve objections before the final card is printed.
Accuracy	Maps must have a precision of 5 cm to 10 cm; errors larger than this are grounds for re-survey.
Inclusivity	No household in the “Abadi” area can be left out if the structure is visible.

Based on the grievance details provided and the administrative structure of Uttar Pradesh, here are the contact details for the public authorities responsible for addressing the corruption and implementation failures in Tehsil Lalganj.

1. Primary Oversight Authority (State Level)

Since the grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0042472) has been forwarded to the Chief Minister’s Secretariat, this is the highest point of escalation for issues involving “tyranny” of local staff.

• Public Authority: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
• Department: Chief Minister Secretariat, Uttar Pradesh
• Address: Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
• Email Address: arvind.12574@gov.in
• Contact Number: 0522-2226350
• Web Link: jansunwai.up.nic.in (IGRS Portal)

2. District Administration (Mirzapur)

The District Magistrate is the “Nodal Officer” for the SVAMITVA scheme at the district level and has the power to order a re-survey or audit of the Lalganj Tehsil records.

• Public Authority: District Magistrate (DM), Mirzapur
• Office Address: Collectorate Office, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh – 231001
• Email Address: dm-mirzapur@up.gov.in
• Web Link: mirzapur.nic.in

3. Revenue & SVAMITVA Implementation (State Level)

The Board of Revenue manages the “Gharauni” (property card) database and the technical implementation of the drone survey.

• Public Authority: Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh
• Address: Sarojini Naidu Marg, Lucknow / Prayagraj
• Email Address: borlko@nic.in
• Web Link: vaad.up.nic.in / svamitva.nic.in

---

Summary Table for Quick Reference

Authority Level	Office Name	Key Contact/Link
State Level	CM Secretariat (Joint Secretary)	0522-2226350 / arvind.12574@gov.in
District Level	District Magistrate, Mirzapur	mirzapur.nic.in
Scheme Level	Ministry of Panchayati Raj (Central)	svamitva.nic.in
Grievance Portal	IGRS (Jansunwai UP)	jansunwai.up.nic.in

---

How to use these details for your Application (GOVUP/E/2025/0042472)

1. Status Tracking: Visit the Jansunwai Portal and enter your Grievance Registration Number to see the latest comments from the “Officer Concerns To.”
2. Escalation: If the Lalganj Tehsil staff provides a false “closed” report, you can use the email addresses above to file an Appeal, citing the specific exclusion of Ram Dulari Devi’s property despite the SVAMITVA drone survey guidelines.

Would you like me to draft a formal follow-up email directed to the Joint Secretary, Shri Arvind Mohan, referencing your specific registration number?