Anarkali Devi’s family has lived on the same Abadi land in Dubar Kalan for over a hundred years. No court ever questioned it. No neighbor disputed it. Then boulders appeared between her house and the road, and the paperwork meant to protect her home quietly began to change. This Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh is her attempt to be heard. Shivam Gupta filed it on her behalf, under Registration No. GOVUP/E/2025/0014969, alleging a “triple nexus” between local police, the land mafia, and the Tehsil administration. Together, these three forces allegedly turned a century of lawful residence into something officials could suddenly claim didn’t count. This isn’t an abstract policy story. It’s what happens when land records, meant to protect ownership, instead become a weapon against the very people who have held that land the longest.

Key Takeaways

  • Anarkali Devi’s family has lived on their Abadi land for over a hundred years, yet a grievance on land grabbing in Uttar Pradesh has arisen due to alleged collusion between local authorities and the land mafia.
  • The grievance, filed by Shivam Gupta, claims a ‘triple nexus’ that undermines her family’s long-standing ownership, converting their legitimate residence into something officials contest.
  • Officials reportedly manipulate land records to obscure original ownership and enable unauthorized land claims, despite confirming the family’s history on the land.
  • The case exemplifies systemic issues, as current anti-land-mafia efforts often fail due to the involvement of the same officials accused of enabling land grabbing.
  • For those facing similar issues, documenting evidence, filing formal complaints, and escalating claims beyond local authorities are essential steps to protect property rights.

Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh: The Lalganj Case

Anarkali Devi’s family has lived on the same Abadi land in Dubar Kalan for over a hundred years. No court ever questioned that. No neighbor disputed it. But then boulders appeared between her house and the road. As a result, the paperwork meant to protect her home quietly began to change.

This grievance on land grabbing in Uttar Pradesh is her attempt to be heard. Shivam Gupta filed it on her behalf. The registration number is GOVUP/E/2025/0014969. Specifically, it alleges a “triple nexus.” Local police, the land mafia, and the Tehsil administration allegedly worked together. Together, they turned her century of residence into something officials could suddenly claim didn’t count.

In other words, this isn’t an abstract policy story. Instead, it’s what happens when land records become a weapon against the people who’ve held the land longest.

How the Alleged Land-Grabbing Scheme Works

The grievance describes a pattern. Indeed, it goes beyond one plot, one family, or one bad actor.

First, it starts with the records. Officials allegedly split the original plot, Gata number 1240, into new sub-divisions like “1240घ.” On paper, this looks routine. In practice, however, the complaint says, it buries the original ownership trail. It also clears the way for unauthorized allotments that would otherwise be easy to spot. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

Next comes the paperwork itself. Many families never needed formal titles, because no one ever challenged their claim. As a result, they now can’t prove what everyone around them already knows.

Finally, there’s the law meant to keep the peace. Police allegedly invoke Sections 107 and 116 of the Cr.P.C. against both sides of the dispute. These provisions exist to prevent breaches of peace. Instead, they treat the person defending her home and the person trying to take it as equally suspect. For the family being pushed out, therefore, that’s not neutrality. Rather, it’s silence, imposed by the state.

The Boulders, the Chowki, and the Paper Trap

For Anarkali Devi, this played out in a physical way. Specifically, a man named Ram Kishun allegedly placed boulders between the main road and her house. Consequently, this cut off her access. It’s a familiar tactic: first, make a home harder to live in, and then let the pressure to leave do the rest. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

So she turned to the police. However, the response made things worse, not better. The local Chowki in-charge, Shriram Singh, reportedly accepted the accused’s verbal claim to the land. Meanwhile, he allegedly dismissed her family’s century of residence, simply because she couldn’t produce paperwork on the spot.

That said, this isn’t a small technicality. Across rural Uttar Pradesh, families routinely hold Abadi land through lived, inherited possession rather than digital title. Officials know this. Yet the grievance argues they exploited it anyway.

Even the Tehsil’s own report reportedly confirms her family’s generations-long residence. Yet it also denies them standing, because their names don’t appear in current revenue records. In short, the state left the records incomplete, and then used that gap against her.

Why This Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh Matters Beyond One Plot

The Lalganj case points to a wider problem. For instance, anti-land-mafia measures often depend on the same Lekhpals and Tehsildars accused of enabling the nexus. So, when a citizen files a complaint, the same department investigates itself. As a result, the outcome is often a “parrot report” — a standardized denial that ignores the evidence.

The government claims it has reclaimed over 64,000 acres from the land mafia since 2017. Nevertheless, cases like Anarkali Devi’s suggest the ground reality tells a different story.

Escalation Contacts for This Case

If you’d like to follow this grievance on land grabbing in Uttar Pradesh, you can track it through these channels.

Primary nodal authority

District administration, Mirzapur

Anti-corruption bodies

  • UP Anti-Corruption Organisation: sp-aco-lko@up.gov.in, Mirzapur Unit: 9454402487
  • UP Lokayukta: lokayukta.up.nic.in

Tracking portals

  • UP Jansunwai (Samadhan): jansunwai.up.nic.in
  • IGMS Portal (Central): pgportal.gov.in
  • UP Bhulekh: upbhulekh.gov.in

If You’re Facing Something Like This Yourself (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

Anarkali Devi’s case isn’t unique, and that’s exactly the problem. So, if your own land or home is under threat, here’s a practical path forward — the same path she and her family had to learn the hard way.

1. Document everything first.

For example, photograph the encroachment, note dates, names, and witnesses. Also, keep old records, tax receipts, or utility bills tied to the property. After all, a paper trail makes possession harder to dismiss, even an informal one.

2. File through Jansunwai (Samadhan) first. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

This is the state’s official grievance portal. Because it creates a registration number and a searchable record, that record matters later, especially if local officials try to bury your complaint.

3. Don’t accept a “parrot report” quietly.

Sometimes the accused department investigates itself and ignores your evidence. When that happens, therefore, file a written rejoinder and point to the specific evidence the report failed to address. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

4. Escalate past the local Tehsil if you suspect collusion.

Write directly to the District Magistrate. Additionally, if police inaction is part of the problem, copy the Superintendent of Police too. For suspected corruption, meanwhile, contact the UP Anti-Corruption Organisation or the Lokayukta, since both operate outside the local chain of command.

5. Cite the Revenue Code, not just your story. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

Under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, long-term possession of Abadi land can carry recognized rights, even without formal title. So, name this law directly in your complaint.

6. Request an external inspection. (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

If you distrust the local Tehsil’s report, ask for a team from outside that Tehsil instead. That way, an outside team can conduct a fresh, independent spot inspection.

7. Use the central government as a backstop.

If the state process stalls, then file a parallel grievance through the IGMS portal (pgportal.gov.in). (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

Overall, none of these steps guarantee a fast resolution. Still, each one builds a record that’s harder to ignore.

Final Thoughts (Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh)

For Anarkali Devi, this was never just a property line. Rather, it’s the home her family has known for generations, and the only shelter they have. In fact, this grievance on land grabbing in Uttar Pradesh shows how quietly officials can take that away — not through force alone, but through a few altered numbers on a page and an office willing to look away.

After all, receiving a complaint isn’t the same as answering it. So far, her family remains exactly where the boulders left them: blocked, and waiting.

Concerned Public Authorities


Facing something similar? Reach out.

Yogi M. P. Singh, Anti-Corruption Crusader, Human Rights Defender and RTI Activist, advises people dealing with police harassment, human rights violations, corruption in public works, denied entitlements, or unanswered RTI requests.

Mobile / WhatsApp: 7379105911

Email: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Home » Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh

4 responses to “Grievance on Land Grabbing in Uttar Pradesh”

  1. Whether it is regime of land mafia who are depriving the people from their dwelling places through corrupt practices. Think about the gravity of situation they are living for hundred years and police is asking them to provide the documents of revenue records. It is fault of the government that it is not maintaining the records of the Abadi land.

  2. Arun Pratap Singh avatar
    Arun Pratap Singh

    Such things are happening because of rampant corruption in the working of tehsils in the Government of India which are local offices of the department of revenue in the state. Sometimes I think that whether we are ruled by the corruption as corruption has replaced the rule of law.

  3. Beerbhadra Singh avatar

    The position is very much serious because of corruption in the working of the public authority tahsil Lalganj and concerned police under the Ambit of circle officer Lalganj. Think about the seriousness of the matter but the concerned r only procrastinating on it.

  4. Police, RTO, revenue offices and commission in development works are four sources of back door income of the corrupt public staff in the states. Here it is obvious that tahsil Lalganj is playing cryptic roll to collect huge backdoor income through this Abadi land by creating various New numbers from the gata number 1240.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading