The blog post highlights a critical failure in the local investigative process in the co city area. It also details the struggle of a victim to maintain the integrity of her legal case. Here are the key takeaways:

• Loss of Vital Evidence: The primary issue is the disappearance of original medical records (X-rays and prescriptions) from Tej Bahadur Sapru Hospital, which prove the victim suffered a fractured thumb and head injuries.
• Police Internal Contradictions: There is a “he-said-she-said” deadlock between two officers. Sub-Inspector Jaishankar Rai claims he handed over the documents to Sub-Inspector Raghavendra Rai, while the latter denies ever receiving them.
• Compromised Legal Standing: The loss of original documents severely weakens the victim’s case. Scanned copies are harder to admit as primary evidence in court. This is because the originals are needed to verify authenticity.
• Procedural Irregularities: The post highlights suspicious administrative actions. These include the “overwriting” of case numbers on official communications. It also mentions the closing of grievances without actually addressing the missing documents.
• Harassment Allegations: Beyond the missing paperwork, the victim makes serious allegations. She claims that police are using intimidating phone calls. These calls aim to discourage her from pursuing the matter with senior officials.
• Call for Accountability: The core demand is for the Mirzapur Police to demonstrate transparency. They must return the original documents. Additionally, they should ensure the medical evidence is officially recorded in the investigation.

The Missing Evidence: A Victim’s Fight Against Mirzapur Police (CO City) Negligence

In the pursuit of justice, medical records are often the silent witnesses that speak the loudest. However, for Mahima Maurya is a victim of physical assault in District Mirzapur. These vital documents have become the centre of a frustrating bureaucratic tug-of-war. In this case, the actions of the city officials involved, CO city have further complicated efforts to recover the documents. Despite multiple formal grievances, the Mirzapur police have failed to account for original medical evidence. As a result, this raises serious questions about transparency and police accountability.

---

The Core Dispute and CO City: Missing Original Documents

The heart of this grievance lies in the mishandling of original medical records from Tej Bahadur Sapru Hospital, Prayagraj. These documents include X-ray reports proving a fractured thumb and records of head injuries requiring three stitches. Furthermore, they were handed over to the first Investigating Officer (IO), Sub-Inspector Jaishankar Rai. In some city investigations, notably within co city, such issues often reflect wider problems in document handling.

Since the transfer of the case (NCR-104/2024) to a new IO, Sub-Inspector Raghavendra Rai, the original documents have vanished.

• The Claim: Sub-Inspector Jaishankar Rai asserts he transferred the documents to the new officer.
• The Denial: Sub-Inspector Raghavendra Rai repeatedly denies receiving them.
• The Victim’s Position: Mahima Maurya possesses audio recordings. These recordings confirm the contradictory statements. However, the police department remains silent on the whereabouts of her medical history.

The role of CO City Vivek Jawla Is quite negative. He arbitrarily accepted the Arbitrary reports of the sub inspectors.

A Pattern of Administrative Failure

The grievance history reveals a troubling cycle of “closed” cases without actual resolution. In many instances, city authorities such as those in co city fail to address documentation properly.

• Registration No. GOVUP/E/2025/0055171: The case was closed on July 10, 2025. It concluded with a generic report that ignored the primary demand for the return of original documents.
• Registration No. GOVUP/E/2025/0079180: Currently forwarded to the Chief Minister’s Secretariat. Yet the Circle Officer has failed to confirm. It is uncertain if the scanned copies provided via the portal have even reached the case file.

The police continue to focus on the background of the dispute. It is a family rivalry. They do this rather than addressing the illegal retention or loss of primary evidence by their own officers.

Questions of Transparency and Accountability in the working of CO City

The working style of the Mirzapur police has come under intense scrutiny for two main reasons. Moreover, other city administration examples, like those from co city, offer insights into the necessity for improved transparency.

1. Inconsistent Paperwork: In communications to the Community Health Centre (CHC) Vindhyachal, the Case Number was initially marked as “Nil. The Sections were also marked as “Nil”. Later these were crudely overwritten.
2. Pressure Tactics: The applicant alleges that police personnel are using “irritating calls.” These calls are intended to pressure her into withdrawing her representations to senior officers.

Senior officers specially CO City played negative role In the entire matter .

The Legal Stakes

Under Indian law, a scanned copy is only admissible if the original is proven to be lost. It must also be authenticated through a strict chain-of-custody analysis. The Mirzapur police are either losing or withholding the original X-ray reports and prescriptions. This failure is weakening the victim’s case before it even reaches the court. Comparing similar problems in co city, legal accountability should be enforced without exception.

A fractured bone constitutes a “grievous injury” under the law. Ignoring this evidence protects the offenders. It also denies the victim a fair trial.

---

Conclusion: Justice Delayed is Justice Denied

Mahima Maurya’s struggle is not just about a family dispute; it is about the integrity of the investigative process. A Sub-Inspector can take original documents. They face no accountability when these documents disappear. The “dignity of the police” is indeed compromised. Ultimately, only accountability practices akin to those found in co city can restore public confidence.

The Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, must intervene immediately to:

• Locate and return the original medical records.
• Ensure the current IO, Raghavendra Rai, includes the medical evidence in the official case diary.
• Investigate the conduct of Sub-Inspector Jaishankar Rai regarding the “lost” documents.

To assist with your follow-up and ensure your grievance reaches the correct authorities, here are the structured contact details and web links for the officials involved in your case.

---

1. Core Public Authority (Chief Minister’s Secretariat)

These details are for Shri Arvind Mohan, who is currently listed as the officer concerned for your latest grievance.

• Officer Name: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
• Office Address: Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, Lok Bhawan, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow, PIN: 226001.
• Official Phone: 0522-2226350 / 0522-2226354
• Official Email: arvind.12574@gov.in (Note: Often written with [at] and [dot] in public records to prevent spam).
• Web Portal: Jansunwai (IGRS) Portal

2. Mirzapur District Police Authorities

If you need to escalate the issue regarding the “missing” original documents or the conduct of the Sub-Inspectors, these are the high-level contacts in Mirzapur:

Designation	Name	Mobile (CUG)	Email Address
DIG / SSP Mirzapur	Shri Somen Barma (IPS)	9454400299	spmzr-up@nic.in
Addl. SP (City)	Shri Nitesh Singh (PPS)	9454401104	asp-city.mi@up.gov.in
IG Vindhyachal Range	Shri Rakesh Prakash Singh	9454400215	digrmir@nic.in

3. Application & Reference Summary

Keep these IDs handy when calling or sending emails, as they will use these to pull up your electronic file.

• Primary Registration ID: GOVUP/E/2025/0079180 (Current)
• Previous IDs for Reference: * GOVUP/E/2025/0065174 (Closed/Dissatisfied)
  • GOVUP/E/2025/0063543 (Closed)
  • GOVUP/E/2025/0055171 (Closed)
• Police Case Number: NCR-104/2024 (Section 115(2)/352 BNS)

---

Next Step for You

I can help you draft a formal email to the Addl. SP (City) Mirzapur (Shri Nitesh Singh). The email should specifically mention the contradiction between Sub-Inspector Jaishankar Rai and Sub-Inspector Raghavendra Rai. This contradiction involves your original medical documents.