PM Kisan Irregularities are the cause of a Farmer Mr Singh’s Grievance. Because of corruption, Government is not making Serious efforts to curb such evil practice.

Meanwhile, there are ongoing updates on Tantrik K.P. Singh that have captured PM Kisan Scheme: A Farmer’s Grievance Highlights Systemic Hurdles, showing the difficulties with the scheme.

Keshav Pratap Singh is a farmer from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. He recently filed a grievance. It highlights the practical challenges applicants face with the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme. Despite the scheme’s aim to provide financial support to farmers, Mr. Singh experiences a frustrating cycle of application rejection and bureaucratic finger-pointing.


The Initial Grievance for PM Kisan

On December 14, 2024, Keshav Pratap Singh, a resident of the local community, filed a grievance regarding his PM-KISAN application (Registration No. GOVUP/E/2024/0091353). This application had been pending approval at the Sub-District/Block level since October 31, 2024, causing him considerable frustration and concern about the delay. Keshav, who relies on this financial assistance to support his family’s agricultural activities, expressed his dissatisfaction with the lack of communication and clarity surrounding the approval process. He hoped that lodging this grievance would expedite the resolution of his case and allow him to access the much-needed benefits associated with the PM-KISAN scheme, which is designed to provide economic support to farmers across the nation.

Mr. Singh stated that he had correctly submitted his application, ensuring that every detail was meticulously filled out to avoid any potential discrepancies. He provided all necessary information, including his Aadhaar number (8224 XXXX 7042) and comprehensive revenue records, which reflected the hard work he had put into his farming endeavors. In his earnest attempts to expedite the verification process, he urged officials at the block, sub-divisional, and district agriculture offices to prioritize his case, emphasizing the importance of a swift resolution. His hope was to gain from PM Kisan, which would enable him to continue investing in his agricultural activities and ultimately support his family and community. Mr. Singh believed that timely support from the government could make a significant difference in the lives of farmers like him, allowing them to thrive in a challenging economic landscape.


Department’s Response and Case Closure

The authorities closed the case on December 30, 2024. In their official remarks, they said, “We received the report from the concerned party and sent it for disposal. We have attached the report.”

On December 27, 2024, the office of the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Mirzapur, provided a detailed response directly addressing Mr. Singh. It explained that the tehsil office rejected his application. This was because he did not upload a certified copy of the khatauni (land record) during the first registration.

The letter further claims that on December 27, 2024, an official contacted Mr. Singh on his mobile number (9794089100). He advised him to re-upload the certified khatauni and bank passbook. He also suggested uploading a copy of his Aadhaar card at a Common Service Centre (CSC). According to the department, Mr. Singh refused to do so. The letter concludes by reiterating the plea for him to upload the required documents. This step allows for verification and processing of his PM-KISAN benefits.


The Farmer’s Rebuttal of objection in PM Kisan application processing.

Mr. Singh rated the resolution as “Poor.” He provided a sharp rebuttal. He argued that the objections raised by the revenue department staff were arbitrary. Mr. Singh believed they promoted corruption. He contested the rejection on three main grounds:

  1. Aadhaar Verification: He argues that applicants do not need to upload the Aadhaar card. The application process already verifies their identity using an OTP sent to the mobile number linked with the Aadhaar.
  2. Bank Passbook: Mr. Singh stated that the government requires beneficiaries to keep an Indian Post Payment Bank account linked to their Aadhaar. He questioned why they need to upload a passbook. Their bank account already links to Aadhaar for PM Kisan applications.
  3. Revenue Records: He claimed that the required revenue records, verified by the local lekhpal, he had already uploaded. He deemed the objection arbitrary and a pretext for corruption.

This case highlights a significant disconnect. The digital processes of the scheme do not align with the on-ground verification standards demanded by local officials. The farmer believes the online, OTP-based verifications should suffice. Still, the department insists on the manual uploading of physical documents. This disagreement leads to a stalemate. As a result, it ultimately denies a potential beneficiary his rights under the scheme.

Conclusion

The case of Keshav Pratap Singh vividly illustrates the persistent challenges that can plague even well-intentioned government schemes like PM-KISAN. While the digital infrastructure is designed for efficiency and transparency, the ground-level implementation often introduces bureaucratic hurdles and what Mr. Singh alleges are arbitrary demands. This disconnect not only frustrates farmers who are in genuine need of support but also undermines the very purpose of such welfare initiatives.

Mr. Singh’s grievance and his subsequent detailed rebuttal highlight a critical need for alignment between the digital application process and the physical verification procedures. If an Aadhaar-linked OTP and bank account are sufficient for initial verification, then demanding physical uploads of the same documents for re-verification appears redundant and can be perceived as an avenue for unnecessary delays or, worse, corruption.

For the PM-KISAN scheme to truly succeed, authorities must address these systemic hurdles. This includes clarifying documentation requirements, streamlining the verification process, and ensuring that local officials adhere to established digital protocols. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a system that is not only robust against fraud but also genuinely accessible and supportive for every farmer, ensuring that deserving beneficiaries like Keshav Pratap Singh receive the timely assistance they are entitled to without undue hardship.


Staff of Bijaipur SO of postal department Mirzapur is procrastinating on application to link Aadhar with the mobile number and email


PM-Kisan portal is not working is key issue

Home » PM Kisan Scheme: Addressing Farmer Grievances

4 responses to “PM Kisan Scheme: Addressing Farmer Grievances”

  1. Ashok Kumar Maurya avatar
    Ashok Kumar Maurya

    Online application is a trick to deprived in entitled beneficiaries from
    the prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi. They have made many bogus
    beneficiaries through fraud records. They have blessings of high rank
    bureaucrats and executives and promote corruption in the implementation of
    a scheme. The credibility of the government has reached Nadir. They have
    made prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi as source of back door income.

  2. Anil Kumar Maurya avatar
    Anil Kumar Maurya

    It is an obligatory duty of the concerned staff of the government to ensure
    transparency and accountability in the implementation of the prime minister
    Kisan Samman Nidhi which is not being done currently due to corruption
    prevailing throughout the system. It is most unfortunate that bureaucrats
    of high rank in the administrative hierarchy are itself colluding with
    subordinates and promoting mismanagement and corruption in the public
    system.

  3. Such practices are adopted to promote the corruption in the implementation
    of prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi. If the former who applies for the
    prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi meet them and provide the convenience
    money which is bribe in accordance with the law then they set the in smooth
    passage for that application otherwise such cunning tricks are used by them
    to harass the genuine applicant of PM Kisan Samman Nidhi. There is rampant
    corruption in the implementation of the prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi
    scheme.

  4. If the foundation of the implementation of the government scheme is based
    on corruption then how can the scheme of the government reach the needy?
    Think about the gravity of the situation the application of the farmer
    arbitrarily rejected by the concerned staff of the government because this
    farmer did not provide illegal gratification to the concerned staff of the
    government which is usual practice of the department that no file moves
    without greasing the palm of the concerned staff. Senior rank bureaucrats
    in the administrative hierarchy do not take action on this mismanagement
    which is the root cause of it.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

December 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender, Anti-corruption Crusader & RTI Activist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading