PM-KISAN: Resolving PM-KISAN Grievances & Addressing Delays. The processing of applications by the Directorate of Agriculture in Lucknow involves block, tehsil, and district levels. Consequently, this process has exposed significant gaps in openness and trust in addressing PM-KISAN Grievances. Many applicants have reported issues in the application process. As a result, this leads to confusion and stress among farmers who rely on this scheme for money help. Moreover, the lack of clear updates and status tracking adds to distrust. Furthermore, delays at various levels make the situation worse. Therefore, quick fixes are needed to ensure that benefits of the PM-KISAN scheme reach farmers without unnecessary delays or problems.

Key Takeaways

  • The PM-KISAN scheme faces significant delays in processing applications, leading to farmer confusion and stress.
  • Many PM-KISAN grievances stem from bureaucratic hurdles at the Directorate of Agriculture, which does not take timely action.
  • Lack of transparency and administrative neglect compounds issues, resulting in stalled applications that the government struggles to address.
  • Farmers encounter procedural rejections due to minor discrepancies, highlighting incompetence and lack of support within the system.
  • Immediate reforms are necessary to ensure timely resolutions and restore trust in the PM-KISAN scheme.

Respected Sir, regarding unresolved PM-KISAN grievances,

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh has submitted many PM-KISAN Grievances regarding ongoing issues. Consequently, he faces difficulty getting necessary approval of his PM-KISAN application, which is key for his farm work. Meanwhile, his application currently remains stuck at the Directorate of Agriculture, Lucknow. There, he has faced many bureaucratic hurdles and delays. However, despite repeated efforts to raise his concerns and speak with staff for clear answers, the situation remains unchanged. Thus, this leaves him unsure about getting financial help essential for his farming. As a result, this lack of progress affects his work and raises concerns about governmental support systems designed to help farmers in need.

Grave Concerns Regarding Delays

Initially, the Directorate of Agriculture at Lucknow has been forwarding the PM-KISAN Grievances. Meanwhile, they consistently choose not to take direct action. Instead, they pass them to the Deputy Director of Agriculture, District Mirzapur. Consequently, this practice not only delays the resolution but also shows a lack of ownership and responsibility at the state level.

Furthermore, more than nine months have passed; however, the application is still waiting for approval. Consequently, the long delay clearly shows lack of care by officials. Moreover, it highlights bad planning, especially within the office of the Director of Agriculture at Lucknow.

Lack of Transparency in PM-KISAN Grievances

Moreover, there is no transparency or accountability in running the PM-KISAN scheme, which is a major concern for farmers who expect clarity in money transfers. On paper, PM-KISAN is set up for direct benefit transfer (DBT) to remove middle agents and speed up rural support. However, actual work on the ground suffers from deep setup problems.

Procedural Bottlenecks & Rejections

Complex multi-step check processes—moving across village land clerks (Lekhpals), block farm officers, district tehsils, and the state agriculture office—cause repeated requests for paper copies. Consequently, small name differences between Aadhaar cards and land records (Khatauni) often lead to quiet rejections, leaving farmers unaware of why their payments have stopped and exacerbating PM-KISAN grievances.

The incompetence of personnel and lack of help desks at the Directorate have created a major bureaucratic bottleneck. As a result, these delays and mismanagement have stopped timely help from reaching farmers, thus undermining the scheme’s goal. Thus, this lack of action upsets farmers who count on support for their work. Furthermore, it lowers trust in government initiatives designed to improve agricultural productivity and rural life. In addition, without proper checks and smooth steps, there is a higher risk of corruption and misuse of funds. Consequently, this creates more problems and keeps the system broken.

Administrative Neglect & Automated Responses

In addition, it appears that the Director of Agriculture operates above the rule of law. Consequently, many complaints are disposed of in his name by subordinates using automated copy-paste replies. However, this happens without any substantive action or ground checks. Instead of fixing issues at the state office, complaints are constantly sent back to district offices that delayed them in the first place. Thus, this creates an endless cycle of passing the blame. Therefore, such official neglect violates the principles of good governance. Furthermore, it shows a state of administrative anarchy where official duty is completely missing.

Failure of Oversight on PM-KISAN Grievances

The situation is worrying as it raises questions about the work of our government offices in handling PM-KISAN complaints. Meanwhile, the Chief Minister’s Office is expected to ensure duty across all levels. However, it seems powerless before the Director of Agriculture, a position that should face strict oversight. Consequently, this lack of checks in the farm sector encourages the office to continue its non-compliance and negligence. Therefore, this sets a bad example that weakens public trust and slows growth. Furthermore, the lack of action from the Chief Minister’s Office keeps things broken. As a result, it creates long-term harms for the farming community.

Conclusion on Resolving PM-KISAN Grievances

In light of the above, it is vital to recognize the systemic failure that has spread through various levels of checks and administration. Therefore, we must take immediate, decisive reformative measures to fix these core issues. To restore trust in the PM-KISAN scheme, the state administration must set clear time limits for application steps and track complaint timelines. Furthermore, it should build open online portals where farmers can view real-time delay reasons. Meanwhile, the applicant’s complaints stem from a series of unaddressed concerns and lack of fast responses. Thus, they deserve a careful look and a timely and fair resolution that addresses their claims while ensuring justice. Consequently, responsible staff must be held strictly accountable for delays and surface-level answers. Subsequently, they should hold transparent talks with affected farmers to restore trust in public service.

Certainly. Here is a summary of the PM-KISAN Grievances based on the provided text.

📝 Grievance Summary: PM-KISAN Grievances & Verification


Key Details of PM-KISAN Grievances

DetailInformation
Complainant NameYogi M. P. Singh (on behalf of Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh)
Grievance Registration No.GOVUP/E/2025/0103068
Date of Receipt04/09/2025
Concerned DepartmentDepartment of Agriculture, Uttar Pradesh
Officer Concerns ToShri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Uttar Pradesh)

Background & Core PM-KISAN Application Issue

The grievance concerns the pending approval of a PM-KISAN (Prime Minister Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme) application submitted by Keshav Pratap Singh.

  • Application Details:
    • Aadhaar No.: 8224 3509 7042
    • Block: Chhanvey
    • District: Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh
  • Current Application Status: Pending for approval at the Sub-District/Block level.
  • Previous Grievance IDs:
  • Supporting Documents: Application details, Revenue records, and Aadhaar card copies were attached to the grievance to facilitate verification.

Request for Action on Farmer Grievances

The complainant is requesting expedited intervention to:

Review and approve the PM-KISAN application without further delay; consequently, the applicant can receive the scheme benefits.al Magistrate (Sadar), and the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Mirzapur to hasten the verification process so that delays are cut short.

Direct the concerned Block-level officials, Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Sadar), and the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Mirzapur to hasten the verification process so that delays are cut short.

Home » PM-KISAN Grievances: Urgent Need for Transparency

5 responses to “PM-KISAN Grievances: Urgent Need for Transparency”

  1. If our prime minister is providing something to the farmers as their rights then it must reached to them and if it is not reaching it is painful. If our prime minister is still claiming to be honest then it is troublesome. It is painful that after 1 year our public staff could not provide the assistance of pm Kisan Samman Nidhi to a farmer.

  2. Beerbhadra Singh avatar

    The economy of this largest democracy in the world is based on the agriculture and if the government is providing some assistance to the farmers then it must reach to them in transparent and accountable manner but it is not taking place in such a way. The public assistance is not reaching to the needy farmers due to rampant corruption in the government machinery and this corruption is oriented from top to bottom in the administrative hierarchy.

  3. From the rampant corruption and procrastination by the staff of tehsil and department of agriculture, it is obvious that the scheme launched by our great prime minister Narendra damodardas Modi is not reaching to the entitled people. More than 1 year passed but concerned are only procrastinating on the application of the Keshav Pratap Singh of the prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi.

  4. Prime minister Kisan Samman Nidhi is the ambitious scheme of our great prime minister Narendra damodardas Modi. Narendra damodardas Modi is the first prime minister of India who publicly declared that neither I will take the bribe nor opposition will be allowed to do so. In the state of Uttar Pradesh it is the Government of Bhartiya Janata party and in the centre there is government of our great honest prime minister Narendra damodardas Modi.

  5. Pm Kisan scheme of the goverment of India is not reaching to the needy because of the rampant corruption in the implementation of the scheme. Think about the gravity of situation, public functionaries procrastinate on the applications in which concerned beneficiary does not provide illegal gratification to them

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

September 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading