Illegal detention and arbitrary reports of Mirzapur police are sparking intense discussion among local citizens. People actively question the accountability and daily operations of the police force. How can the concerned authorities torture a victim in such an unjust manner? Every citizen expects law enforcement officers to protect their fundamental rights rather than abuse administrative power. When officers detain individuals unlawfully and submit misleading reports to higher authorities, they directly undermine public trust in the justice system. Furthermore, this disturbing pattern of behaviour demonstrates a complete disregard for established judicial directives and official state guidelines. To restore faith in local governance, state authorities must immediately investigate these serious allegations, penalise the responsible officers, and deliver complete justice to the victim without delay.

Illegal Detention and Arbitrary Reports: The Crisis of Accountability in Mirzapur Police

This case of illegal detention and arbitrary reports centers on Mahima Maurya. She has filed repeated grievances on the Uttar Pradesh Jansunwai portal. Specifically, she alleges that Mirzapur police illegally detained her husband, Pramod Kumar Kushwaha. Afterward, officials buried the complaint under a misleading response. Together, these grievances describe more than an isolated incident of police misconduct. Indeed, they expose a systemic failure in accountability. They also reveal a disregard for clear judicial and governmental directives, and, ultimately, a fundamental challenge to the promised “good governance” in Uttar Pradesh.

So this analysis breaks down the core issues behind the illegal detention and arbitrary reports at the heart of this case. First, it examines the legal framework that demands compensation for victims. Then it turns to the alarming inconsistency in the official response. Finally, it considers the implications for public trust in law enforcement.

---

1. The Core Allegation: Illegal Detention and the Claim for Compensation

The case centers on the detention of Pramod Kumar Kushwaha. Mahima Maurya says Mirzapur police illegally detained her husband. He later secured bail from the Subdivisional Magistrate’s court.

Her initial grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0014667) demands Rs. 25,000 in compensation for the illegal detention. Specifically, it cites a government circular issued on September 9, 2021. That circular provides for such compensation under sections 107/116/151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Meanwhile, the complainant points to a glaring discrepancy in the police’s own paperwork. Officers allegedly arrested Pramod Kumar Kushwaha. However, police documents show the arrest of a different person: Mithilesh Maurya. The records cite sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) instead. But the BNSS only replaced the CrPC in 2023, so section 151 of CrPC still applies to the 2021 circular’s context. In short, the core claim stays the same: police arrested Pramod Kumar Kushwaha but documented Mithilesh Maurya’s arrest instead, using his place of detention as the site of her husband’s illegal detention. This mismatch — arresting one person and documenting another — therefore sits at the center of the claim.

The Legal Mandate for Compensation

The Rs. 25,000 compensation demand rests on formal directives, not arbitrary numbers:

• Allahabad High Court directives: The Allahabad High Court has ruled clearly on this point. The state must compensate victims of illegal detention. It must also start disciplinary proceedings against the responsible officers.
• Government circular (September 9, 2021): The official press note, reproduced in the grievance, states plainly that a victim of illegal custody under sections 107/116/151 will receive Rs. 25,000 in compensation. It also states that responsible officers will face disciplinary action.
• UP Victim Compensation Scheme, 2014: This scheme provides the overarching legal framework. As a result, it makes crime victims, including victims of illegal detention, eligible for compensation.

Despite this, Mirzapur police — and the wider state mechanism — have failed to even acknowledge this legal and administrative mandate, let alone act on it. That failure therefore raises serious questions about the state’s respect for its own laws and judicial orders.

---

2. Arbitrary Reports and the CM Office’s Credibility

The most damning part of this saga involves the official response submitted by the Additional Superintendent of Police (A.S.P.), Mirzapur. This is, in effect, the “arbitrary reports” half of this illegal detention and arbitrary reports case.

The Arbitrary and Inconsistent Report

The grievance with registration number GOVUP/E/2025/0021253 raises outrage over what it calls an “arbitrary and inconsistent report” from the Additional S.P. Specifically, it says the report “does not touch the submissions of the following grievance.” The complainant asks directly:

How can chief minister office accept such bogus report submitted by the additional S.P. Mirzapur on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh because such approach of the Chief Minister Office is lowering the dignity of portal?

In other words, the police officer’s report sidestepped the central issues entirely. It ignored the alleged illegal detention of Pramod Kumar Kushwaha. It ignored the Rs. 25,000 compensation demand. And it ignored the request for disciplinary action against the officers involved. Rather than conduct a proper inquiry, the A.S.P. appears to have filed a boilerplate or misleading report instead. Consequently, that report led to the premature closure of the earlier grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0014667) with a generic remark: “आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है महोदय, जाँच आख्या संलग्न है” (Report is respectfully submitted for perusal, Sir, investigation report is attached).

Undermining the Jansunwai Portal

The Jansunwai portal exists to bring transparency and accountability to governance. But when senior officers like an Additional S.P. submit reports that visibly dodge the core complaint, the credibility of the entire “good governance” framework takes a hit. This is especially true when the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) accepts such reports anyway. Indeed, the complainant makes a fair point here. These actions by the CMO’s office, represented by the forwarding officer, Shri Arvind Mohan, Joint Secretary, lower the dignity of the very platform meant to serve citizens.

---

3. The Broader Implications: Anarchy and Mockery of the Law

The complainant uses strong language, and the record may well justify it. She describes “anarchy in the working of the police.” She also says “human rights violations are quite rampant in this state.” Furthermore, she calls the local police’s actions a “mockery of the law of land.

Still, these aren’t empty claims. Rather, they point to a real disconnect between what officials promise and what happens on the ground.

Directives Versus Reality

The Director General of Police (DGP) issues multiple circulars demanding compliance with legal standards, including rules on illegal detention and extortion. Yet Mirzapur police allegedly violate these standards anyway. Worse, they then submit misleading reports to cover up the violations.

The Power of Impunity

Officials have repeatedly failed to take concrete action against this kind of misconduct, despite repeated complaints. That failure, in turn, suggests some officers operate with a sense of impunity. For example, when an Additional S.P. submits an arbitrary report and faces no immediate challenge, it signals that internal accountability mechanisms are breaking down.

Erosion of Public Trust

If police fail to compensate victims of illegal detention, the failure undermines public trust. It also suggests that circulars issued by the DGP may be misleading or ineffective. As a result, public faith erodes when a system protects its own misconduct instead of protecting citizens’ rights.

---

4. A Path Forward: Demand for Transparent and Accountable Resolution (Illegal detention and arbitrary reports)

Any real resolution to this case of illegal detention and arbitrary reports must go beyond a perfunctory response. Instead, it must address two failures together: the illegal detention itself, and the arbitrary official response that followed.

Steps to Restore Credibility (Illegal detention and arbitrary reports)

Therefore, the state government — and particularly the Chief Minister’s Office — should take the following steps:

1. Re-open and re-investigate. Officials should reopen both grievances (GOVUP/E/2025/0014667 and GOVUP/E/2025/0021253) for a full, impartial investigation. A senior officer from outside the Mirzapur district should lead it. Specifically, this officer should compare police documents against the magistrate court’s bail records. They should also verify whether police illegally detained him, regardless of whether they documented the arrest under section 151 CrPC or covered it up by recording Mithilesh Maurya’s arrest instead.
2. Ensure compensation. If investigators confirm the illegal detention, officials should immediately disburse the Rs. 25,000 compensation to Pramod Kumar Kushwaha. This follows directly from the September 9, 2021 government circular and the Allahabad High Court’s directives.
3. Start disciplinary action. Two groups deserve scrutiny here: the police personnel responsible for the illegal detention, and the Additional S.P. who submitted the arbitrary report (GOVUP/E/2025/0021253). Both should face strict disciplinary proceedings to establish accountability and deter future misconduct.
4. Address the failure publicly. Finally, the Chief Minister’s Office should issue a public statement, or a detailed and non-arbitrary response, on the Jansunwai portal. This response should acknowledge the shortcomings in the process. It should also reaffirm the CMO’s commitment to the High Court’s directives and its own circulars.

What’s at Stake (Illegal detention and arbitrary reports)

Ultimately, the case of Pramod Kumar Kushwaha tests Uttar Pradesh’s commitment to good governance. If left unresolved, this pattern of illegal detention and arbitrary reports will confirm a hard truth: police impunity remains part of the policing landscape. Consequently, high-level circulars and court orders risk becoming meaningless.

Consider, too, the deep-rooted corruption at the L.D.A., where officials categorize every grievance as C-Category of Dinesh Pratap Singh. If the L.D.A. seeks documents from Dinesh Pratap Singh, it must therefore provide a sequenced list so verification can proceed.., where officials categorize every grievance as C-Category of Dinesh Pratap Singh. If the L.D.A. seeks documents from Dinesh Pratap Singh, it must provide a sequenced list so verification can proceed.matter as police in state of Uttar Pradesh has been incredible