Date: October 14, 2025
The recent events highlight a glaring issue that has persisted for far too long within the community. Justice denied in Mirzapur continues to be a pressing concern that affects not only the individuals directly involved but also the wider society, fostering a sense of distrust in the legal system.
This unsettling reality is drawing attention from many who are advocating for change, as citizens rally together to demand accountability and transparency.
The implications of such ongoing injustices extend beyond mere statistics; they resonate deeply with the values of fairness and equity that underpin a just society.

Is Justice Denied in Mirzapur? Old age Citizens, Land Disputes, and the Fight for Transparency

Date: October 14, 2025

Something is deeply troubling in Mirzapur. A family’s fight for justice against alleged land grabbers faces strict challenges that seem to multiply at every turn. Local collusion only makes things harder, creating an atmosphere of intimidation and despair.
They have encountered a wall of silence and evasion from the very authorities meant to protect them, who appear to be either unwilling or unable to intervene in their plight. This isn’t just about a land dispute, but rather a broader issue that strikes at the heart of community ethics and moral responsibility.
It’s about the fundamental right to information and accountability, critical rights that every citizen should freely enjoy. It’s also about whether elderly citizens can expect a fair hearing in Uttar Pradesh, or if age and vulnerability will continue to be obstacles they must navigate in a biased system.
This concern is particularly relevant under the shadow of justice delayed in Mirzapur, where countless others have faced similar injustices, highlighting not only a personal battle but a widespread systemic failure that demands urgent attention and reform.

The Heart of the Matter: A Family’s Plea

At the center of this unfolding drama are Shri Raj Kumar Gupta and Smt. Anarkali, old age citizens from Mirzapur. They filed a representation alleging a forced land agreement and criminal acts of coercion and forgery. Their son, Shivam Gupta, sought crucial information. He used the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 to help. Justice is so often denied in Mirzapur. He wanted to understand what action—the police had taken, if any.

What he received in return wasn’t information, but a masterclass in bureaucratic obfuscation.

The RTI Act applied in matter Justice Denied in Mirzapur : A Shield, Not a Blindfold

The RTI Act was designed to empower citizens, promote transparency, and hold public authorities accountable. In this case, the Public Information Officer (PIO) from the Mirzapur Police seems determined to undermine these principles.
They are turning it into a tool for concealment, thereby obstructing the very essence of accountability that citizens rely on. This concerning instance of justice denied in Mirzapur raises questions about accountability highlights a broader issue, as it reflects a disturbing trend where officials prioritize their own interests over the public’s right to information.
Such actions not only compromise the efforts aimed at transparency but also breed an atmosphere of distrust among the citizens, who are left questioning the integrity of those meant to serve and protect them.

Here’s a breakdown of the glaring issues that raise serious questions:

1. Where is the “Action Taken Report”?

When a serious complaint of coercion and forgery is filed, citizens expect a clear “Action Taken Report” (ATR). Instead, the PIO provided an “investigation report” that appears to justify a questionable agreement. More alarmingly, there’s no confirmation that the prime victims—the old age parents—were even contacted or had their statements recorded. How can an investigation be legitimate if the victims are ignored? Justice seems to be denied in Mirzapur, leaving many frustrated.

2. Evasion on Victim Testimonies

The PIO was asked a direct question: “Why were the victim’s testimonies not taken?” The response? Another generic report, completely sidestepping the “reason” for this critical omission. This isn’t just unhelpful; it suggests a deliberate effort to avoid accountability for a flawed process. Justice inconsistently applied, perhaps even denied, in Mirzapur demands attention.

3. The Mysterious Investigating Officer

Shivam Gupta asked for the name and designation of the police officer who actually conducted the ground investigation. The PIO named a supervising officer but conspicuously left out the subordinate officer. Furthermore, there’s a strong suspicion. One of the documents provided seems to be a manipulated excerpt from another portal. It has crucial details removed. Why the secrecy? What are they trying to hide? Such obfuscation only fuels the perception of justice denied within Mirzapur’s corridors.

4. Passing the Buck: Police or Revenue?

Allegations of criminal acts like coercion and forgery are firmly within police jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the PIO repeatedly deflected. They stated the matter was a “land dispute” and thus under the “Revenue Department.” This is a blatant abdication of police responsibility. Are criminal complaints now to be ignored if they happen to involve land? Justice denied in cases involving Mirzapur’s land disputes highlights systemic issues.

5. Selective Justice: Victims Implicated, Aggressors Spared?

Preventive action (Section 126/135 BNSS) was taken against the appellant and his mother. They live 35 km away and are the alleged victims. The most shocking revelation is this action, while the supposed aggressors seemingly faced no such action. The PIO provided no “reason” for this disparity. This raises serious concerns about misuse of power and potential collusion. Such incidents cement the unfortunate reality of justice consistently denied to certain groups in Mirzapur.

What’s at Stake?

This isn’t just about one family. It’s about:

• The integrity of the RTI Act: If public officials can routinely give misleading information, the purpose is undermined. Incomplete information further compromises the Act’s purpose. This defeats the very purpose of the Act.
• Trust in law enforcement: When the police refuse to investigate criminal complaints or give transparent answers, public trust erodes. This trust is further diminished when justice seems denied so often in places like Mirzapur.
• Protection of Old age citizens: If vulnerable individuals can’t get justice, who will give it? Furthermore, if they can’t reach information about their complaints, who will protect them? Sadly, justice still denied across Mirzapur leaves many vulnerable.

A Call for Intervention

The Uttar Pradesh Information Commission is now hearing this Second Appeal. Shivam Gupta is praying for immediate intervention. He demands full information. He also calls for an inquiry into the PIO’s conduct and penalties for deliberate obstruction. When justice is so often denied in the heart of Mirzapur, intervention becomes crucial.

Will the Commission act to guarantee transparency and justice? Or will the walls of evasion continue to stand strong in Mirzapur?

#RTI #Mirzapur #JusticeDenied #Transparency #Accountability #SeniorCitizens #UttarPradesh #InformationCommission

UPHRC directed S.P. Mirzapur to act in accordance with law in matter of Sadhana

PIO and FAA in office of superintendent of police Mirzapur have made a practice to deny every information sought by information seekers