Every year, thousands of Indian farmers wait months, and even years, for the government to fulfill its promise regarding damages they never should have suffered in the first place. This Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur serves as a compelling case in point. Shri Dayanand Singh, a farmer from Village Nibi Gahwar in Mirzapur, unfortunately lost his entire crop due to a fire sparked by a short circuit in UPPCL’s electrical lines back in 2021. Although officials formally approved his compensation in February 2025, the money, however, still has not reached his bank account — instead, it remains trapped in a bureaucratic standoff between the Electricity Department and the Revenue Administration.

Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur: Justice Delayed for Farmer Dayanand Singh

Literature often romanticizes the plight of the Indian farmer. In the corridors of bureaucracy, however, that plight looks very different: it is a saga of endless paperwork and systemic apathy. Indeed, this Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur case — involving Shri Dayanand Singh, a resident of Village Nibi Gahwar in Mirzapur — starkly indicts the administrative machinery of Uttar Pradesh. Although Mr. Singh holds a legally approved claim for compensation following a crop fire caused by electrical negligence, he still has not received a single rupee. Instead, the Electricity Department and the Revenue Administration keep batting his case back and forth like a game of “ping-pong.”

---

The Genesis of the Incident: Fire and Negligence

On April 18, 2021, a devastating fire tore through Dayanand Singh’s crops. Notably, the cause was not a natural disaster; rather, a short circuit in the electrical lines maintained by Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (UPPCL) sparked the blaze. Ultimately, for a farmer, losing a harvest means more than a financial setback — after all, it destroys a year’s labor and strips away the primary means of survival for his family.

After the accident, the investigation moved forward, albeit at a glacial pace. In fact, it took nearly three years before the Directorate of Electrical Safety finalized its Investigation Report No. VSAE0000017111 (dated January 19, 2024). Finally, this report confirmed the department’s liability.

Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur: A Paper Victory

By February 2025, the administrative hurdles seemed to have cleared — at least on paper. Specifically, Executive Engineer Manish Kumar Srivastav issued an Office Memorandum (Letter No. 1063 V.V.K.-M) confirming the following details of this Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur:

• Beneficiary: Shri Dayanand Singh, S/o Shri Shobhnath Singh
• Approved Amount: ₹25,200.00
• Approval Authority: Sub Collector (Approved on February 14, 2025)
• Disbursement Channel: Allahabad UP Gramin Bank (Account details verified)

Despite this formal approval and the clear identification of the beneficiary, the funds still have not reached the farmer’s bank account. Instead, what should have been a straightforward electronic transfer has turned into a bureaucratic nightmare of jurisdictional disputes.

---

The Jurisdictional Deadlock: Revenue vs. Electricity Department

According to activist Yogi M. P. Singh, the current grievance stems from outright “anarchy” within the Mirzapur district administration. Specifically, and repeatedly, the Executive Engineer of the Electricity Distribution Division II has signaled that the matter requires input or verification from the Tehsildar Sadar and the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Sadar.

For instance, officials sent communication Letter No. 6482 dated October 21, 2024, to the Tehsildar Sadar requesting an inquiry. Yet the Revenue Department’s response has been marked by “procrastination” and outright “dereliction of duty.”

The “Not My Department” Syndrome

On the Jansunwai (IGRS) portal, the grievances filed (Reference Nos. 40019925000043 and 40019924029565) reveal a frustrating pattern. Indeed, whenever the complaints reach the Tehsildar level, officials frequently update the status with the remark:

“Report Category: Not related to this department/office.”

This “Special Close” status slaps in the face of a citizen’s constitutional right to seek redressal. So, if the Executive Engineer blames the delay on a pending report from the Tehsildar, and the Tehsildar insists the matter falls outside his jurisdiction, where can the farmer possibly turn?

---

A Violation of Constitutional Duty

Rightly, activist Yogi M. P. Singh has invoked Article 51A of the Constitution of India, which emphasizes fundamental duties. Specifically, he argues that this arbitrary forwarding of grievances between the District Magistrate’s office and the Electricity Division reflects a clear lack of accountability.

Meanwhile, the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO), which monitors the Jansunwai portal, also faces scrutiny here. After all, the portal was designed to bridge the gap between the government and the common man. However, when senior officials submit inconsistent and evasive reports, they lower the dignity of the public grievance system and erode trust in the “Double Engine” governance model.

The Human Cost of Administrative Procrastination

Meanwhile, while officials debate over who should sign which file, Dayanand Singh’s family continues to bear the burden of a loss that occurred nearly four years ago.

• For UPPCL, ₹25,200 may amount to a small budgetary line item; for a village farmer, however, it represents the ability to buy seeds and fertilizer, or to pay off debts for the next season.
• Crucially, moreover, the compensation amount never factors in the interest and mental agony caused by a four-year delay.

---

Accountability: The Need of the Hour

Clearly, the local UPPCL office in Mirzapur cannot hide behind the Revenue Department’s silence indefinitely. After all, once the Sub Collector approved the compensation on February 14, 2025, no legal or procedural ground remained to withhold the payment.

Therefore, the District Magistrate of Mirzapur must intervene to break this cycle of “Special Close” reports on the IGRS portal. Ultimately, a clear directive is needed: either the Tehsildar Sadar provides the necessary verification — if the process still requires it — or the Executive Engineer proceeds with payment based on the Sub Collector’s existing approval.

Conclusion: Will Justice Be Served?

This long-delayed Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur not only serves as a litmus test for the entire Mirzapur administration, but also illustrates the complexities at play in the case of Dayanand Singh, which makes that clear. Indeed, it further exposes a broken link in the chain of command, where departments frequently act as silos rather than as a cohesive government.

Consequently, we call upon the Executive Engineer (Electricity Distribution Division II) and the District Magistrate of Mirzapur to:

1. Consequently, immediately release the approved amount of ₹25,200 to the farmer’s bank account.
2. Provide a clear explanation for the delay between the accident (2021) and the final approval (2025). Furthermore, delve into the contributing factors and circumstances that led to this extended timeline.
3. Ensure that the Jansunwai portal serves as a mechanism for genuine resolution rather than a tool for “passing the buck.”

A farmer’s patience is not a license for administrative negligence.

Clearly, the documentation shows a classic case of “Bureaucratic Shifting,” where a lack of institutional accountability creates a loop of suffering for the citizen. In short, therefore, when departments prioritize “closing a file” over “solving a problem,” the essence of public service gets lost.

In the case of Dayanand Singh, this accountability gap manifests in three specific ways.

---

1. The Jurisdictional “Black Hole”

First, the Executive Engineer (Electricity) insists he needs a report from the Tehsildar (Revenue). The Tehsildar, however, uses the “Not Related to Department” tag to dismiss the grievance outright. As a result, this creates a “Black Hole” where responsibility for the farmer’s compensation simply disappears. (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

• The Reality: The Sub-Collector already approved the compensation on February 14, 2025.
• The Failure: Despite this approval, the local office still uses “pending inquiries” as a stalling tactic to avoid disbursing funds from its budget.

2. The Manipulation of the Jansunwai (IGRS) Portal

Second, officials designed the portal for transparency, yet, as the documents show, they are gaming it instead. Specifically, by marking a case as “Special Close” (निस्तारित) based on a technicality rather than actual payment, officials satisfy the system’s metrics without providing any real relief to the farmer. (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

3. Erosion of Constitutional Dignity

Third, as the application notes under Article 51A, the Mirzapur administration’s “arbitrary and inconsistent reports” do not just hurt one farmer — they damage the integrity of the State Government as a whole. Furthermore, when such blatant procrastination occurs even while the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) monitors these portals, it suggests a real breakdown in the “top-down” oversight mechanism.

---

Comparison of Facts vs. Administrative Action (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

Category	Actual Status	Administrative Response
Eligibility	Fully Verified (Investigated Jan 2024)	“Under Investigation” (Oct 2024)
Funding	Approved (₹25,200)	Funds not disbursed
Responsibility	Executive Engineer / SDM	“Not my department” (Tehsildar)
Timeline	Accident occurred in 2021	Still pending in 2025

The Path Forward for Accountability (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

To break this cycle, officials should escalate the matter not as a “new” grievance, but instead as a “Contempt of Approved Order.” After all, since the Sub-Collector already signed off on the payment (14.02.2025), any further delay by the Executive Engineer directly violates a superior’s order.

So, to help you follow up effectively on the case of Dayanand Singh, here are the comprehensive contact details and digital links for the relevant public authorities.

1. Key Application IDs for Reference

When communicating with these offices, always cite these numbers so officials can track the file: (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

• Approval Memorandum: Letter No. 1063 V.V.K.-(M.) (Date: 18.02.2025)
• Grievance ID (Jansunwai): 40019925000043 & 40019924029565
• Central Grievance ID: GOVUPE20240090596
• Investigation Report: VSAE0000017111 (Directorate of Electrical Safety)

---

2. Primary Public Authorities (Mirzapur District) (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

Authority	Name/Designation	Mobile Number	Email / Web Link
District Magistrate (DM)	Shri Pawan Kumar Gangwar	9454417567	dmmir@nic.in
Exec. Engineer (UPPCL)	Manish Kumar Srivastav (EDD-II)	9450963598	puvvnl.in
Tehsildar Sadar	Tehsildar Office (Sadar)	9454417672 (CUG)	mirzapur.nic.in
Sub-Collector/SDM	SDM Sadar Mirzapur	9454417576	Revenue Board

---

3. State-Level Oversight & Portals

If local Mirzapur offices continue to provide inconsistent reports, consider these escalation points instead: (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

• Jansunwai (IGRS) Portal:
  • Web Link: jansunwai.up.nic.in
  • CM Helpline: Dial 1076 (Available 24/7 for UP residents)
  • Technical Email: jansunwai-up@gov.in
• UPPCL/PuVVNL Headquarters (Varanasi):
  • Managing Director (PuVVNL): md@puvvnl.in / mdpurvanchalvvnl@gmail.com
  • MD Phone: 0542-2318437
  • Chief Engineer (Mirzapur Region): 9450963509
• Chief Minister’s Office (CMO):
  • Email: cmup@nic.in
  • Phone: 0522-2236181

---

4. Important Web Links for Tracking (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

• Track IGRS Status: Track Grievance
• UP Power Corporation: uppcl.org
• Mirzapur District Official Site: mirzapur.nic.in

Suggested Next Step (Compensation Approval for Accident in Mirzapur)

Since the Executive Engineer (9450963598) issued the memorandum but still has not released the payment, the most effective move is to send a WhatsApp message or SMS to his CUG number and the DM’s CUG number (9454417567), citing the Application IDs above.