---

📱 Identity Theft Alert: India Post Booking System Allegedly Exploited for Fraud

Key Takeaways

• On October 29, 2025, a grievance was filed. It pointed out the fraudulent use of a personal mobile number in the India Post Booking System. This incident raised concerns about identity misuse.
• The response from the Department of Posts overlooked the fraud issue. This oversight allows for potential impersonation. It occurs due to a lack of verification procedures.
• The complainant demands immediate disclosure of sender details. They also ask for a departmental inquiry into the Chunar SO. Furthermore, they seek action against the officer who mishandled the case.
• This incident highlights a significant vulnerability in the India Post Booking System, risking exploitation and scams.
• The DOP has a responsibility to guarantee data security and integrity. This protects citizens from identity fraud. It also reinforces the credibility of the postal service.

The Core Problem of India Post Booking System: Unauthorized Use of Private Mobile Numbers

On October 29, 2025, Yogi M. P. Singh filed a formal grievance with the Department of Posts (DOP). The reason was, someone unauthorizedly used his personal mobile number (7379105911). This fraudulent use led to the number appearing on the booking slips of three Speed Post articles. Singh was neither the sender nor the intended recipient. He still received SMS tracking updates, which revealed that the mechanism incorrectly recorded his number as the sender’s contact. This situation raised serious concerns about the integrity of India Post’s booking system.

This is not a simple administrative error. Using a private number for official postal transactions without consent or verification is a grave act of identity misuse. It facilitates criminal activity, like Cheating by Personation (under BNS, 2023).

---

🛑 The Department’s Inadequate Response

The concerned officer, J. M. Pandey (Assistant Director of Postal Services), prematurely closed the starting grievance (Registration No. DPOST/E/2025/0046033) on November 6, 2025, with a profoundly irrelevant remark.

Official Remark: “R/Sir, We would like to inform you that your article EU536411928IN, EU536417769IN, and EU536417914IN have been delivered. They were delivered to the DPRO (District Public Relations Officer) on 28.10.2025.”

This response completely overlooked the core issue of fraud and identity misuse. The complaint did not focus on the delivery status. It highlighted why the mechanism accepted his number at the Chunar SO (Pin code: 231304). There was no verification. This oversight effectively enabled an unknown party to impersonate him and exploit the vulnerabilities in the India Post Booking System.

---

🎯 The Three Key Demands: Moving Beyond Delivery Status

The complainant re-sent his grievance (Registration No. DPOST/E/2025/0047546) on November 6, 2025, outlining specific, necessary actions. A higher authority, Shri Rupesh Pal (ADG PG), in New Delhi has received this re-submission.

The demands are clear and non-negotiable:

1. Immediate Disclosure of Details: The DOP must promptly release the full name of the Sender. They must also supply the full physical location and any other contact details. The Sender used the fraudulent number. The DOP must also include the Receiver’s details, (DPRO). This information is, legally needed to file a Formal Police Complaint (FIR) against the involved parties.
2. Departmental Inquiry: The authorities must launch a thorough investigation against the postal staff at Chunar SO (231304). They need to find out how the booking system permitted such a blatant misuse of data. It did so without mandating basic phone number verification.
3. Action Against Concerned Officer: Take action against the officer who submitted the non-responsive report. Their negligence caused the premature closure of a serious fraud case.

---

🔔 A Call for Data Security and Integrity

The simple act of delivery does not negate the fraudulent booking. This case highlights a critical vulnerability in the India Post booking protocol. Repeatedly using a non-sender’s number on official records exposes it to exploitation. This practice makes it a tool for scams and other criminal activities.

The DOP has an ethical and procedural responsibility to protect citizens’ data. The petitioner urges the ADG PG to treat this matter with the utmost seriousness. This is necessary to safeguard the integrity of the postal service. It is also important to protect private citizens from identity fraud, ensuring the India Post Booking System remains secure.

---

🎯 Focused Point of the Grievance

The core issue is not delivery status. The Department of Posts‘ (DOP) booking protocol failed critically. This failure enabled an act of identity misuse/fraudulent impersonation against a citizen.

The immediate objective of the complainant (Yogi M. P. Singh) is to force the disclosure of the Sender’s identity to initiate a criminal complaint (FIR) for the unauthorized use of his private mobile number (7379105911) on official postal records.

---

💡 Learning Lesson for Citizens and the Department in the matter of India Post Booking System

For Citizens: Heightened Vigilance 🕵️

• Track Unknown SMS: Receiving unexpected tracking SMS for postal articles, banking, or other services is a sign of identity misuse. It can also be a phishing effort. Do not dismiss these messages.
• Act Instantly: If someone uses your personal data, like a mobile number, without authorization, take action. This occurs in an official capacity, like on a postal booking slip. File a formal grievance promptly. Demand details, as this information is essential for reporting the crime to law enforcement.

For India Post (DOP): Systemic Vulnerability 🔒

• Verification is Mandatory: This case exposes a critical gap: the lack of mandatory OTP or SMS verification of the sender’s mobile number at the point of booking (e.g., at Chunar SO).
• Digital Integrity: The Department must implement strict, real-time verification protocols. This ensures the data entered into the framework truly belongs to the transacting party. It prevents the postal service from being an unwitting facilitator of fraud and impersonation.

---

The focused point emphasizes the crime, and the learning lesson highlights the necessary security improvements. Would you like me to draft a concise press release or social media post using these points?

Mismanagement in registry of letters and speed post in sub-post offices

Staff of dept. of post must not overlook registry and speed post