Key Takeaways

• Yogi M. P. Singh’s case against the CBEC reveals systemic failures in the GST registration process, leading to multiple GST frauds.
• Two separate fraudulent firms, M/s Ganga Enterprises and M/s Kurmi International Trades, registered at the same location, highlighting administrative negligence.
• Despite assurances of inquiry, repeated frauds occurred, demonstrating a lack of accountability in the approving authority.
• Singh demands rigorous action against fraudsters and systemic reforms to prevent future GST frauds, invoking constitutional duties.
• Immediate cancellation of fraudulent registrations and a high-level inquiry into departmental negligence are key action requests.

Introduction

The ongoing ordeal of Yogi M. P. Singh against the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) and the CGST & CX Division, Mirzapur, reveals more. It is more than an isolated case of fraud. It reveals a deeply worrying pattern of systemic failure in the GST registration process. This failure contributes to multiple GST frauds. This detailed account shows how two separate fraudulent firms were registered. They used the same residential location. This underscores a critical lack of administrative accountability in oversight, particularly about multiple GST frauds arising from the same location.

---

🛑 Repeat Offender: How a “Broken System” Allows Multiple GST Frauds at the Same Address 🛑

The ongoing ordeal of Yogi M. P. Singh against the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) and the CGST & CX Division, Mirzapur, reveals fraud. This fraud is more than an isolated case. It also highlights a deeply worrying pattern of systemic failure in the GST registration process. This detailed account shows that two separate fraudulent firms were registered using the same residential location. This problem underscores a critical lack of administrative accountability, contributing to multiple instances of fraud in GST processes.

---

1. The Pattern of Fraudulent Registration: A Tale of Two Firms

This grievance is a stark follow-up to an earlier complaint. It demonstrates that corrective measures promised by the department were insufficient to prevent multiple GST frauds from occurring again.

The First Case (2022) involved the fraudulent GST registration of M/s Ganga Enterprises (Prop. Vivek Mehta). The property owner alleged that this registration was obtained with a forged NOC (No-Objection Certificate). The NOC was from a deceased family member. In response to the original grievance, the department assured the complainant that an “ongoing inquiry” was underway and “necessary action… is already under process as per GST Law.”

Despite this supposed inquiry, a Second Case (2025) emerged. A team from the CGST department visited the exact same property. They conducted a physical verification of a new firm: M/s Kurmi International Trades. The most shocking fact learned was the nature of the fraud this time. The firm had allegedly submitted a utility bill. It had a manipulated electricity connection number that did not match the actual meter installed at the premises. This proved the registration was approved based on forged documentation, even though the location had been flagged just years prior due to similar GST frauds.

Crux of the Issue: The complainant argues that the repeated success of these registrations relied initially on a forged NOC. Later, it depended on a manipulated utility bill. This pattern proves the CGST Division, Mirzapur, is repeatedly approving registrations without basic due diligence.

---

2. Failure to Resolve: The Department’s Stance vs. Reality

The department’s response primarily focuses on legal closure actions rather than systemic correction, which the complainant finds wholly unsatisfactory.

The Official Stance emphasizes that the GST registration process is largely ‘FACELESS’ (or non-physical/CPC-based), which minimizes direct officer-taxpayer contact. The jurisdictional authority confirmed their cancellation of M/s Kurmi International Trades‘ registration after discovering that the firm did not exist. This discovery followed an alert. Additionally, they issued an Alert Notice and Show Cause Notice in the older Ganga Enterprises case. Despite these actions, they closed the grievance. This appeal stated that “necessary action as per law has been taken.” No new information was submitted.

In contrast, the Complainant’s Reality is one of continued distress. Mr. Singh stresses that the problem lies not merely with the firms, but with the approving authority. He argues that the “FACELESS” system does not absolve officers of their responsibility. They must actively verify submitted documents, especially when someone has already flagged the location. This issue causes multiple GST frauds due to administrative oversight. It also leads to repeated disruption for the family through unnecessary physical verification visits.

---

3. Prayer for Justice in Multiple GST Frauds: Demands for Systemic Accountability

Invoking the fundamental duty under Article 51A of the Constitution, Mr Singh brings matters of “grave concern” to public authority. He seeks immediate and rigorous action against repeated GST frauds.

Action Requested Against Fraudsters & Firms:

• Immediate and Permanent Cancellation of the GST registration of M/s Kurmi International Trades.
• Initiation of Criminal Proceedings against all proprietors and parties involved in creating and submitting the forged documents.
• A Detailed Action Taken Report about M/s Ganga Enterprises and its proprietor, Vivek Mehta.

Action Requested for Systemic Reform & Accountability:

1. High-Level Vigilance Inquiry: Launch an investigation into the office of the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Mirzapur. The aim is to find the officers responsible for negligence. Hold them accountable for approving multiple registrations at the same disputed location, which contributes to GST frauds.
2. Property redlisting Mechanism: Implement a robust protocol to redlist the specific property location promptly. This should occur after a confirmed fraud. It will prevent any future registrations without explicit, physical consent from the legal owners.

The complainant concludes that the issue points towards significant revenue loss. It also indicates administrative rot due to multiple GST frauds. The complainant demands the “utmost seriousness” from the authorities while addressing these multiple GST frauds.

Government of Modi Sir is not taking GST Fraud seriously quite obvious from fraud of GST OFFICE

3 TEP in I.T. and 1 FIR in police, fraudulent transactions of Rs.161206667 reached to Rs.343877662. Transactions of Rs.343877662 by misusing PAN and police could not reach to offenders