Introduction Investigating Tax Fraud in India

Investigating tax fraud involves a comprehensive study of the misuse of the Permanent Account Number (PAN): GSWPS0850Q, which has come to light due to the relentless activities of cybercriminals exploiting it for their gain. Despite substantial evidence regarding this misuse, including documented transactions and identified patterns of illegal financial activities, concerned public officials and staff have yet to take appropriate action in the matter. This inaction raises serious questions about the effectiveness of current measures and the willingness of authorities to tackle such issues promptly. As the misuse of PAN continues to escalate, there is an urgent need for the appropriate governmental and regulatory bodies to intervene and put mechanisms in place to protect innocent taxpayers from these illicit activities and safeguard the integrity of the tax system.

📝 Investigating Tax Fraud: The Case of PAN Misuse and Alleged Inaction by the Income Tax Department

Yogi M. P. Singh has filed grievances about PAN misuse. Specifically, he alleges large-scale fraudulent misuse of a Permanent Account Number (PAN) that belongs to Mahesh Pratap Singh (PAN: GSWPS0850Q). According to the complaint, fraudsters used this PAN for big, unauthorized business deals and tax evasion. In addition, he accuses the Income Tax Department (ITD) of failing to fix the problem.

1. The Allegation of Fraudulent PAN Misuse (Investigating Tax Fraud)

The complainant says an unknown, fraudulent party took over Mahesh Pratap Singh’s PAN (DOB: 22/06/1971). Then, they used it to run large business activities. As a result, the innocent PAN holder now faces tax inquiries and bills he says he never earned.

• Misused identity details: The PAN (GSWPS0850Q) links to a mobile number (7024188072), an email address (dngoldraipur18@gmail.com), and an address in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. However, the complainant says these details belong to the fraudsters — not to the real PAN holder, who instead lives in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh.
• Scale of transactions: First, ITD records show transactions of more than ₹34 crore against this PAN. Yet the PAN holder denies running any such business. Specifically, the breakdown includes:
  • Business receipts: ₹4,65,76,920
  • GST purchases: ₹12,20,99,234
  • GST turnover: ₹16,32,92,127
  • Rent received: ₹1,19,09,381

2. Official Grievances and Concerns

Two key grievances show how hard the complainant has fought for a fix. As a result, the case has climbed to the highest levels of government.

Grievance 1: PMOPG/E/2024/0184722 (Prime Minister’s Office)

• Date of receipt: 25/12/2024
• Ministry/Department: Prime Minister’s Office
• ITD’s first response (13/01/2025): Initially, Director of IT Neeta Sharma sent a report with bank account details pulled from the system.
• Complainant’s counter-point: However, the complainant pushed back right away. For instance, he asked how such big business deals could happen without bank accounts at all. In short, the details given were either incomplete, fake, or the deals skipped normal bank checks. Consequently, this gap has made the police probe harder.

Grievance 2: CBODT/E/2025/0013108 (Central Board of Direct Taxes)

• Date of receipt: 14/03/2025
• Grievance description: Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) → Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) → Inaction by Income Tax Department
• Current status: Under process (as of 14/03/2025)
• Officer concerned: Vivek Mishra (Pr. CCIT), Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow Investigating Tax Fraud
• Core concern: Overall, this grievance targets the ITD’s failure to act against the fraudsters. Specifically, the complainant says the department has not given police the checked bank account details tied to the fraud.

3. The Crux of the Issue: The Bank Account Disconnect

At the heart of this case, there sits a sharp contradiction over bank accounts:

• The problem: To begin with, records show huge financial transactions — over ₹34 crore — against the PAN.
• The ITD’s stance (reported): Meanwhile, ITD papers have at times claimed that no bank details exist in the department’s system for this PAN. Similarly, they also say no account holder is found with the depositories (NSDL).
• The logical flaw: Nonetheless, the complainant says deals this big cannot happen without a money trail and bank accounts. So, he argues, the ITD’s failure to trace these details counts as “inaction.” Furthermore, this inaction is stalling the criminal probe into identity theft and tax fraud. (Investigating Tax Fraud)

Ultimately, the complainant’s demand is simple: the Income Tax Department must work with the police. Specifically, it must hand over checked information on how these deals happened and where the data came from. In turn, this would help investigators find and charge the fraudsters.

---

Latest Status Update on the PAN Misuse Grievance

Overall, public records show that the first grievances led to more appeals. Additionally, they also drew in several top-level agencies.

1. Status of Initial Grievance (PMOPG/E/2024/0184722)

• Initial action (13/01/2025): First, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad, said bank account details had been pulled from the database and attached. (Investigating Tax Fraud)
• Complainant’s rating: However, the complainant rated this response “Poor.” Specifically, he said it failed to address the fraud or give checked details for the big transactions.
• The contradiction: Notably, the ITD’s own system flags ₹34.38 crore in transactions. Yet in other messages — including one from the depository — officials claimed no account exists for the PAN. At the same time, they also refused to share details with police.

2. Escalation and Subsequent Actions (CBODT/E/2025/0013108)

Meanwhile, the complainant filed this grievance on 14/03/2025 against Pr. CCIT Lucknow (Vivek Mishra), alleging “Inaction by Income Tax Department.” Apparently, this seems to be part of a wider, ongoing appeal process. (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• Follow-up notice (dated 18/03/2025): Subsequently, an Income Tax Officer (Sonal Singh, ITO DDIT/ADIT (I&CI)) sent a notice to the complainant’s address. Specifically, it demanded an Income Tax Return for FY 2022-23 and warned of a ₹500-per-day fine for not filing. This happened even though the fraud complaint was still open, and despite this, the complainant kept saying the information was wrong. In effect, the ITD kept treating the PAN holder as responsible for deals he denies making. (Investigating Tax Fraud)
• Appeal for CBI enquiry (dated 16/03/2025): In response, the complainant filed another grievance (PMOPG/E/2025/0036445), asking for a CBI enquiry into the cyber fraud. Then, he took the matter to the Prime Minister’s Office and the Ministry of Home Affairs, since both police and the ITD had failed to solve the issue.

3. The Latest Judicial Development (as of July 2025)

By this stage, the case had moved past department grievances and into an independent watch process: (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• Total fraud claim: According to reports, the alleged tax fraud now adds up to as much as ₹350 million (₹35 crore).
• Judicial monitoring: Notably, the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) of Uttar Pradesh is said to be watching the probe directly.
• Core focus of judicial oversight: Specifically, the CIC is overseeing the probe into this large financial crime, which reportedly involves nearly 200 companies tied together through the misused PAN. Moreover, this oversight follows the complainant’s claims of delays and non-compliance by local police in Mirzapur.

---

Conclusion: The Core Unresolved Conflict (Investigating Tax Fraud)

In the end, the records point to one unresolved fight:

• First, the ITD’s own records (AIS/TIS) show huge financial transactions against the PAN (GSWPS0850Q).
• However, the complainant denies making these deals. Instead, he claims identity theft and PAN misuse, and says the mobile number and email tied to the fraud are not his.
• Meanwhile, the ITD and its branches face criticism for sending mixed messages: they demand compliance from the alleged victim while, at the same time, allegedly holding back the full, checked bank details connected to the ₹34+ crore fraud from the police.

Case Moved to CIC

Ultimately, the case has now moved to CIC monitoring. This suggests that the complainant is looking for a higher, independent authority to push the Income Tax Department and police to work together, openly and fully, to expose the fraudsters. suggests the complainant is looking for a higher, independent authority to push the Income Tax Department and police to work together, openly and fully, to expose the fraudsters.

web link details of the concerned public authorities

Here are the official web links for the public authorities named in the article, verified via web search:

1. Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) — Grievance PMOPG/E/2024/0184722 (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• CPGRAMS/PMO grievance portal: pmopg.gov.in (uses the same login as CPGRAMS/PG Portal)
• Central grievance portal (PG Portal): pgportal.gov.in
• PMO facilitation helpline: 011-23386447

2. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) — Grievance CBODT/E/2025/0013108 (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• CBDT / Income Tax Department (under Ministry of Finance): incometaxindia.gov.in
• Department of Revenue (parent department): dor.gov.in
• CBDT overview page: dor.gov.in/central-board-direct-taxes-cbdt

3. Income Tax Department — e-Filing and Grievance Redressal (e-Nivaran) (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• e-Filing portal (submit ITR, grievances, respond to notices): incometax.gov.in
• Grievance submission guide: incometax.gov.in — Submit Grievance
• Grievance email: webmanager@incometax.gov.in
• Demand Management Facilitation Centre: (Investigating Tax Fraud) taxdemand@cpc.incometax.gov.in / toll-free 1800 309 0131

4. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow (Vivek Mishra, Pr. CCIT) (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• Reachable through the Income Tax e-Filing grievance portal above (no separate regional site; office correspondence routes through incometax.gov.in and the CPGRAMS system)

5. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) — sought for CBI Enquiry

• Official website: cbi.gov.in
• Report fraud/corruption: sphq@cbi.gov.in
• Report cyber crime: speou9del@cbi.gov.in
• Headquarters: CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi

6. Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Uttar Pradesh — monitoring the case (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• Uttar Pradesh Information Commission: upsic.gov.in (also referenced as upic.gov.in) (Investigating Tax Fraud)
• RTI online filing portal for UP: rtionline.up.gov.in/RTIMIS
• Address: RTI Bhawan, 7/7A, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow – 226010

7. Depositories (NSDL) — cited regarding “no Beneficial Owner account found” (Investigating Tax Fraud)

• National Securities Depository Ltd: nsdl.co.in

Related Posts like Investigating Tax Fraud in India

• Tax Fraud and PAN Misuse in India: A Call for Accountability
• Reporting Tax Fraud: A Case Study
• Income Tax Fraud Complaint by Yogi M.P. Singh
• Income Tax Grievance: Exploring Corruption Allegations
• Addressing Income Tax Corruption in India