Introduction: Police Station Mauaima Information

Explore the Police Station Mauaima information, including extensive details on RTI requests and crime statistics from the District Prayagraj. This station plays a pivotal role in maintaining law and order in the region; therefore, understanding the intricacies of its operations can shed light on the challenges faced by local law enforcement. Moreover, the RTI requests provide valuable insights into the transparency and accountability of the police force, detailing how they handle public inquiries and grievances. Furthermore, examining the crime statistics will help you grasp trends in criminal activity, thereby showcasing both the successes and ongoing issues within the community. Engaging with this information not only educates residents but also fosters a collaborative spirit between citizens and law enforcement.

Key Takeaways

• Specifically, this article looks at an RTI appeal regarding how the Circle Officer Soraon allegedly withheld information about Police Station Mauaima.
• In the original application, the requester asked for seven types of details, which included crime stats, fuel costs, and officer lists.
• However, the Circle Officer gave no details, which consequently led to complaints of total denial and poor communication.
• Meanwhile, official records say the RTI request and appeal were closed because officials claim they sent the data, although the requester denies receiving it.
• As a result, the requester plans to file a Second Appeal and can also file a Complaint with the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission if needed.

🚨 RTI Appeal: Alleged Denial of Information by Circle Officer Soraon, Prayagraj

In summary, this post reviews the appeal regarding denied information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. The case involves Mauaima Police Station in Prayagraj, where the main issue is that the Circle Officer (PIO) failed to answer seven requested points.

---

📝 The Information Requested

To begin with, the original RTI request was filed on September 30, 2021 (Reg. No. SSPPY/R/2021/60093). It specifically asked the Public Information Officer (PIO), ACP Soraon (formerly Circle Officer Soraon), for details on Mauaima Police Station:

1. Crime Statistics (Current Financial Year):
   • Total N.C.R. (Non-Cognizable Reports) registered.
   • Total F.I.R. (First Information Reports) registered.
   • Cases filed under Sections 107/116/151 of Cr.P.C. (preventive steps).
2. Fuel Expenses (2019-20 and 2020-21):
   • Total costs (figures only) for diesel and petrol.
3. Station House Officer (SHO) Details:
   • Posting details for the current SHO.
   • Date the SHO joined Prayagraj district.
4. Sub-Inspector (SI) Details:
   • Names and posting details for all SIs.
   • Joining dates in Prayagraj district for each SI.
5. Police Constable (PC) Details:
   • Names and posting details for all Constables.
   • Joining dates in Prayagraj district for each Constable.
6. Building Maintenance Funds:
   • Specifically, the amount of money spent on painting and whitewashing over the last five years.
7. Electricity Bill Funds(2019-20 and 2020-21):
   • Specifically, the total public funds used for electricity bills.

---

🏛️ Grounds for Appeal and Alleged Non-Compliance

Subsequently, the requester, Yogi M P Singh, filed an appeal on November 23, 2021 (Reg. No. SSPPY/A/2021/60053), stating that:

• Total Denial of Information: First, the Circle Officer Soraon did not answer any point of the seven-point request, as the PIO completely refused the request.
• Flawed Communication: Furthermore, the Station Officer Mauaima sent a vague denial by post; however, this letter lacked a cover letter from the Circle Officer Soraon (PIO), which demonstrates a breakdown in process and oversight.
• Misuse of the Law: In addition, the requester states that the PIO’s actions undermine the RTI Act 2005. Because of this, he seeks disciplinary action against the Circle Officer Soraon.
• Duty to Share Staff Lists (Section 4(1)(b)(ix)): Finally, the PIO withheld staff details (Points 3, 4, 5), even though under Section 4(1)(b)(ix) of the RTI Act, public authorities must publish a directory of their staff on their own.

---

🛑 Official Status and Rebuttal (Police Station Mauaima Information)

In contrast, official records indicate that both the request and the appeal are DISPOSED OF:

• RTI Request Status: REQUEST DISPOSED OF on 23/01/2025.
  • PIO Reply (Hindi): “आप द्वारा प्रेषित जनसूचना प्रार्थना पत्र के सम्बन्ध में आपको सूचना प्रेषित की जा चुकी है।”
  • (Information has been sent to you concerning the public information application submitted by you.)
• Appeal Status: APPEAL DISPOSED OF on 29/07/2025.
  • FAA Reply (Hindi): “याची योगी एम.पी. सिंह को जनसूचना अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 के तहत प्रार्थना पत्र में मांगी गयी सूचना नियमानुसार दिनांक 23.01.25 को प्रदान की गयी है। अपील पोषणीय न होने के कारण प्रत्यावेदन निस्तारित किया जाता है।”
  • (The info requested by Yogi M.P. Singh under the Right to Information Act 2005 was given on 23.01.25. The appeal is closed as it is not valid.)

Although official replies state that officers sent the information on January 23, 2025, the requester claims they never got it or received incomplete data. Nevertheless, the First Appellate Authority (FAA) closed the appeal under the assumption that the data was sent.

---

⚖️ Legal Context: Key Provisions (Police Station Mauaima Information)

For this reason, the requester bases their claim on key parts of the RTI Act, 2005:

• Public Publishing (Section 4(1)(b)(ix)): Public offices must publish a staff directory proactively. Denying staff details (Points 3, 4, 5) breaks this rule.
• PIO Duties (Chapter V): The PIO must supply the data. Failing to do so without good cause can lead to fines and action under Chapter V (Sections 20(1) and 20(2)).

---

➡️ Next Steps for the Appellant

Although officials closed the case, the requester maintains they never received the data. Therefore, the next logical step in the RTI process is a Second Appeal, or alternatively, a Complaint filed with the State Information Commission (SIC) of Uttar Pradesh.

In particular, to move forward successfully, the requester needs proof to show that they received no data or that the response was incomplete and missed the seven requested points.

Indeed, filing a Second Appeal or Complaint with the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission (UPSIC) is the right move.

Accordingly, outlined below are key instructions for contacting the UPSIC and filing an appeal:

🏛️ Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission (UPSIC) (Police Station Mauaima Information)

Because the First Appellate Authority (FAA) closed your appeal as “not valid,” you should consequently take your case to the State Information Commission.

Contact and Location Details

Detail	Information
Name	Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission
Address	7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN – 226010
Phone Number	0522-2724930
Official Website	http://upic.gov.in (Check this for the official online appeal portal)

---

📝 How to File a Second Appeal (Section 19(3) of RTI Act) (Police Station Mauaima Information)

In order to challenge the First Appellate Authority’s order, the requester files a Second Appeal with the UPSIC.

1. Time Limit

• First, you must file the Second Appeal within 90 days. The deadline starts when the FAA makes or delivers its decision.
• However, the Commission may accept late appeals if you show a good reason for the delay.

2. Documents Required (Self-Attested Copies)

Specifically, your Second Appeal must include these documents:

• Copy of the Original RTI Application sent to the PIO.
• Copy of the PIO’s Reply from Mauaima Police Station.
• Copy of the First Appeal sent to the FAA.
• Copy of the FAA’s Order dated 29/07/2025.
• A Detailed Second Appeal Form (Form-14 in UP). It must state why the FAA’s order is wrong and why you need the details.
• Proof of Fee Payment for the initial RTI application.
• Any extra proof referenced in your appeal.

3. Submission Method

1. For submission, you can submit your appeal in two ways:
2. Online Submission: UPSIC has an online portal. Visit the website (http://upic.gov.in) to file under Section 19(3).
3. Paper Submission: Alternatively, mail your documents via Speed Post or Registered Post to the UPSIC office in Lucknow, or deliver them in person; however, keep a copy of all papers and receipts.

4. Grounds for Your Appeal (Police Station Mauaima Information)

Specifically, in your appeal, clearly outline these main points:

• First, the PIO and FAA failed to give full, accurate details for all seven points.
• Second, the PIO broke Section 4(1)(b)(ix) by not publishing staff directories proactively (Points 3, 4, 5).
• Third, the FAA made an error by calling the appeal invalid when data was missing.
• Finally, ask the Commission to order the PIO to release the information. Also, request disciplinary action and fines under Section 20 of the RTI Act for withholding data.

Related Posts: Police Station Mauaima Information

• Mauaima Police Station and Transparency Issues
• RTI Battle Against Police: A Fight for Transparency in Prayagraj
• Mauaima Police Station: FIR and NCR Counts 2022-23
• Police Action in Prayagraj & RTI Explained
• Yogi M.P. Singh vs. Mauaima Police: A Five-Year Struggle