Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI: Addressing Violations in Tehsil Lalganj, Mirzapur

Transparency concerns in UP’s RTI system are reaching a crisis point. When authorities ignore established RTI processes, they directly undermine the rule of law. The District Magistrate’s Office in Mirzapur typifies this urgent trend: administrative silence, statutory violations, and failures of the RTI portal now leave citizens without recourse.

---

The Core Issue: How Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI Begin — Violation of Section 7(1)

Section 7(1) of the RTI Act legally mandates a Public Information Officer (PIO) to provide the requested information within 30 days of receiving the application.

Application DMOMR/R/2025/60096, filed May 15, 2025, starkly exposes the problem. PIO Tarun Pratap Singh of Lalganj missed the deadline. No disciplinary action has followed, and the portal now blocks the First Appeal, citing a limitation error. Such breaches cannot remain uncontested.

Shivam Gupta now faces an urgent barrier: the RTI portal blocks his First Appeal under Section 19(1), even as the PIO stonewalls. This digital roadblock escalates the crisis, leaving citizens trapped:

1. The portal imposes strict timelines on appeals, which has raised Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI among users.
2. The citizen is left without a digital path for recourse.

---

New RTI Application: Demanding Transparency in Staff Postings at Tehsil Lalganj

In response to the silence on his initial application, the applicant filed a fresh RTI (DMOMR/R/2025/60190) dated August 2, 2025. This request seeks specific information about the staff at Tehsil Lalganj, focusing on:

• Posting History: Joining dates and previous posting details for the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM).
• Class I-IV Employees: A comprehensive list of all categories of staff, their joining dates, and their current work details within the Tehsil.

This information is urgently needed to verify compliance with the Uttar Pradesh Government’s New Transfer Policy (June 15, 2022), which aims to curb corruption by rotating staff. Withholding these details only deepens the transparency crisis and shields officials from accountability.

---

The Link Between Official Stagnation, Corruption, and RTI Transparency Concerns in UP

The applicant argues that Tehsil Lalganj, located in a socio-economically backward area, is particularly vulnerable to corruption. Moreover, when public officials remain in the same post for years, they develop “vested interests” that bypass the law. There must be transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities to curb growing corruption… The most vulnerable section and easy prey is the poor working class.”

Call to Action for the Appellate Authority

The applicant directs the appeal to the SDM of Lalganj and the District Magistrate of Mirzapur, requesting two primary actions:mediate Disclosure: Direct the PIO to provide the information sought in the RTI applications without further delay.

1. Second, start immediate disciplinary proceedings against the PIO for missing the RTI Act’s 30-day deadline.

For the rule of law to survive in Mirzapur, the administration must act now. The RTI portal cannot continue as a shield for unresponsive officials. Addressing transparency concerns in UP’s RTI is not optional—it is a constitutional imperative.

It is deeply concerning that the very officers responsible for transparency — the PIO and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) — are shutting down the legal process, an act legally termed as “Deemed Refusal.” When the PIO or SDM (FAA) refuse to entertain your applications, they are not just being unhelpful; they are committing a statutory violation of the RTI Act.

Take these steps now since the portal is blocked and local officers are unresponsive:

Do not wait for the portal to be fixed or a response from the FAA. File a Complaint under Section 18 right away if the PIO or FAA refuses your application or appeal.

• The Goal: A Section 18 complaint targets punishment and penalties. Specifically, the SIC can impose a fine of up to ₹25,000 — ₹250 per day on the PIO and recommend disciplinary action. Information Commission7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar,Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh – 226010Phone: 0522-2724930

2. Bypass the Portal via Registered Post/Speed Post

If the online RTI portal blocks your appeal, act offline immediately. The law allows you to file an appeal on plain paper. Move swiftly.

• Draft your appeal on paper.
• Attach a screenshot/printout of the portal error as evidence that the system prevented your digital filing.
• Send your appeal by Speed Post with Acknowledgement Due and keep the postal receipt as legal proof of filing. This step is crucial for your case.

3. Move to a Second Appeal u/s 19(3)

If the FAA (SDM Lalganj) does not decide your appeal within 45 days or refuses to accept it, file a Second Appeal directly with the State Information Commission in Lucknow. Unlike a complaint, a Second Appeal empowers the Commission to order the disclosure of the information you requested.

If the FAA (SDM Lalganj) does not decide your appeal within 45 days (or refuses it), you can file a Second Appeal directly with the State Information Commission in Lucknow. This allows the Commission to order disclosure of the information you requested.

---

Suggested Structure for your Complaint to the SIC

If you decide to write to the Commission, use these key points:

• Non-performance of Duty: Mention that the PIO (Tarun Pratap Singh) and FAA (SDM Lalganj) are willfully obstructing the RTI process.
• Technical Sabotage: Highlight that the online portal is being used as a shield to prevent appeals from being submitted.
• Corrupt Practices: Explicitly state your suspicion that the refusal to provide staff posting details is an attempt to cover up violations of the June 15, 2022, Transfer Policy.

---

Important Legal Tip for Citizens Facing Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI

Under Section 20 of the RTI Act, the PIO alone must prove they acted “reasonably and diligently.” Keep your Speed Post receipts and screenshots of portal errors—these are essential to build an airtight case for the Commission to penalise these officers.

Since the Tehsildar (PIO) and SDM (First Appellate Authority) are not entertaining your request and the portal is blocking your appeal, move your case to the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission (UPSIC) in Lucknow.

Below are the official contact details, application IDs from your request, and the specific web links you need to escalate this.

1. Key Application IDs for Escalation (Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI)

You must quote these in all future correspondence with the State Information Commission:

• Original Application ID: DMOMR/R/2025/60096 (Filed: 15/05/2025 – Violation Date)
• New Application ID: DMOMR/R/2025/60190 (Filed: 02/08/2025)

---

2. Official Contact Information (State Level)

To file a Section 18 Complaint (for the PIO’s refusal) or a Section 19(3) Second Appeal (since the SDM is not acting), use these details:

Address	Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission, 7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, UP – 226010
Official Website	upsic.up.gov.in
UPSIC Phone	0522-2724930
RTI Helpline (UP)	0522-2288949
Email Support	onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in

---

3. Essential Web Links (Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI)

File 2nd Appeal / Complaint	UPSIC Citizen Service Portal
Track Case Status	UPSIC Case Status Tracker
Check Weekly Cause List	Weekly Hearing List
General RTI UP Portal	rtionline.up.gov.in

---

4. Direct Action Contacts (Lalganj/Mirzapur) (Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI)

If you wish to send a final warning via email before going to the Commission, use these verified emails from your records:

• PIO (Tehsildar Lalganj): teh-lalganj.mi@up.gov.in
• Nodal Officer (Mirzapur): shakti.3916@up.gov.in
• District Authority: sdm-Lalganj.mi@up.gov.in | adm.fr.mi-up@gov.in

Immediate Next Step: How to Escalate Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI (Transparency Concerns in UP’s RTI)

Since the online portal is returning a “limitation” error, stop relying on it for this case. Instead, send your appeal or complaint via Registered Post or Speed Post to Lucknow address listed above. The physical postal receipt serves as legal proof that you sought justice. Remember, transparency concerns in UP’s RTI cannot be resolved by silence — every step you document strengthens your case before the State Information Commission.