Introduction Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date Set for RTI

The Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date is set for May 20, 2025, where prominent activist Yogi M. P. Singh will present significant RTI appeals, tirelessly advocating for transparency and accountability in government operations. This hearing is expected to draw considerable public attention as it involves crucial inquiries into various administrative decisions and the availability of public information that affects the daily lives of citizens. Through these appeals, Singh showcases the ongoing struggle for citizens’ rights to access information, ensuring that governance remains open and participatory by encouraging a culture of accountability among public officials.

Regarding the Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date, here are the key takeaways based on the blog post:

Specifically, regarding the RTI appeals against the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s Office:

• Crucial Hearing Date: First, the Chief Information Commissioner has scheduled a high-stakes hearing for May 20, 2025. This hearing concerns two second appeals (S01/A/0195/2025 and S01/A/0196/2025) filed by social activist Yogi M. P. Singh.
• The Core Conflict: However, the CMO claims to have fully complied with the RTI requests by providing documents and government orders. In contrast, the appellant (Singh) contends that the information provided is insufficient and lacks substance. The core issue remains NHM (National Health Mission) recruitment and vacancies.
• Rapid Disposal Concerns: The timeline shows that the authorities disposed of the original RTI and the first appeal within 24 hours of each other in December 2024. Consequently, this “swiftness” becomes a major point of contention. The appellant regards it as a procedural dismissal rather than a genuine disclosure of facts.
• CMO’s Defense Strategy: In response, the Public Information Officer, Mr. Vinod Sharma, has formally requested the Commission to exempt the CMO from personal appearances. Specifically, they argue that their administrative obligations are complete since documents were sent via WhatsApp, email, and physical mail.
• Testing Accountability: Therefore, the case serves as a major test for the RTI Act’s efficacy in Uttar Pradesh. Indeed, it highlights the tension between a government office’s desire to conserve “administrative resources” and a citizen’s right to demand direct accountability from state leaders.
• Ongoing Activism: Ultimately, the appeals are part of a broader effort by Yogi M. P. Singh to address systemic transparency issues in the UP government. Specifically, he is focusing on how public health resources and staffing are managed.

Additionally, would you like me to help you draft a formal rejoinder or a letter to the State Information Commission based on these points?

Transparency on Trial: UP Commission Sets Hearing Date for Appeals Against Chief Minister’s Office

By Public Affairs Desk | Updated: June 2025

In the landscape of Indian governance, the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, stands as a lighthouse for accountability. However, the path to obtaining information is often fraught with bureaucratic hurdles. Consequently, this leads to long-drawn legal battles. A significant chapter in this ongoing struggle for transparency is currently unfolding in Uttar Pradesh. There, the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) has fixed the upcoming Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date for May 20, 2025. Furthermore, this hearing concerns two second appeals filed by noted social activist Yogi M. P. Singh against the Public Information Officer (PIO) in the Office of the Chief Minister, Government of Uttar Pradesh.

The Genesis of the Dispute: Appeals S01/A/0195/2025 and S01/A/0196/2025 Set for UP Commission Hearing

On November 30, 2024, Yogi M. P. Singh filed an RTI application (Registration No. DOCMO/R/2024/61566) under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act. He centered the inquiry on IGRS reference number GOVUP/E/2024/0081837. This matter relates to broader systemic issues that the appellant previously highlighted regarding National Health Mission (NHM) recruitments and administrative vacancies.

Meanwhile, the government responded remarkably swiftly, yet the appellant remained unsatisfied. For instance, they disposed of the original RTI on December 19, 2024. Subsequently, Singh filed a first appeal the very next day. The authorities summarily disposed of this appeal on December 20, 2024. Therefore, the rapid-fire disposal of these requests raised questions about the depth and quality of the information provided. This prompted the activist to approach the State Information Commission for a second appeal.

Key Issues Ahead of the Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date: NHM Vacancies and Administrative Accountability

While current hearings focus on procedural compliance, the “core issue” remains the transparency of recruitment processes within the National Health Mission (NHM), Uttar Pradesh. Indeed, for months, Yogi M. P. Singh has been navigating a complex web of RTI applications. He aims to uncover the truth behind recruitment irregularities and vacant positions affecting healthcare delivery.

In addition, the appellant contends that the information provided thus far has been evasive or relies too heavily on technical loopholes. Specifically, the CMO’s office has cited Government Order No. 1/2020/129/34-Lo0Shi0-05/2020-05Lo0Shi0/2019 to justify the status of the information provided. However, for the appellant, this is not merely a matter of receiving a “response.” Instead, he demands “substantive and accurate data” to hold public officials accountable.

The CMO’s Defense Before the UP Hearing: A Plea for Exemption

In response to notices from the State Information Commission, the PIO of the Chief Minister’s Office, Mr. Vinod Sharma, submitted a formal statement. Consequently, the CMO’s position is clear: they believe they have fulfilled their legal obligations.

Specifically, the PIO’s statement outlines three major points:

1. Completion of Proceedings: First, the CMO asserts that all required administrative actions regarding the RTI request have been concluded.
2. Documentation Provided: Second, the office claims to have provided the appellant with photocopies of the RTI responses and the relevant government orders.
3. Request for Personal Exemption: Third, in a significant move, the CMO requested the Commission to exempt their officials from appearing in person. Moreover, they argue that physical appearance is unnecessary since all documents were submitted via email and the departmental portal.

The Procedural Deadlock Leading to the Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date: April 3rd to May 20th

Initially, the State Information Commission scheduled a hearing for April 3, 2025, in Hearing Room No. S-1. However, the case grew complex, and the appellant remained dissatisfied with the CMO’s response. Consequently, the Commission designated the matter for “further hearing.”

Accordingly, the Chief Information Commissioner has now marked May 20, 2025, as the critical Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date. In addition, this delay signifies that the Commission will not dismiss the case based solely on the CMO’s written submissions. Therefore, it suggests a need for deeper scrutiny into whether the information provided to Singh truly meets RTI standards.

Why This UP RTI Hearing Matters: The Precedent for Transparency

Ultimately, this case is more than a legal dispute between an individual and a government office. It is a test of the RTI Act’s efficacy in the highest state office. Thus, with the Chief Minister’s Office as the respondent, public attention is focused on the outcome.

• Administrative Resource vs. Citizen’s Right: The CMO’s request to avoid personal appearance sparks an interesting debate. While conserving administrative resources is vital, the RTI Act’s spirit suggests that the PIO should face direct accountability before the Commission.
• The Digital Trail: On the other hand, using WhatsApp and physical delivery shows a modernizing bureaucracy. However, the appellant argues that the content of the message is more important than the medium of delivery.

Navigating the Future of RTI Beyond the Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date

As we approach the Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date Set of May 20th, several questions remain. On one hand, will the Commission compel the PIO to provide more detailed records regarding the NHM vacancies? On the other hand, will the request for exemption from personal appearance be granted? Alternatively, will the Commission demand a face-to-face explanation for the perceived lack of transparency?

Meanwhile, the activist, Yogi M. P. Singh, maintains that “information delayed is information denied.” Indeed, his persistent tracking of these appeals serves as a reminder that the RTI requires constant vigilance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the upcoming Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date Set on May 20, 2025, will be a landmark moment. As appeals S01/A/0195/2025 and S01/A/0196/2025 reach a fever pitch, the Chief Information Commissioner’s decision will send a strong signal to all government departments.

In summary, the core issue is a citizen’s right to know the inner workings of the Chief Minister’s Office and public health recruitments. This right cannot be buried under a mountain of procedural filings. After all, transparency is not just about responding to a letter; it is about providing the truth. Ultimately, all eyes are on the Commission to see if it will uphold the spirit of the RTI Act.

Finally, here is the structured contact information for the public authorities involved in the RTI appeals mentioned.

1. Public Information Officer (PIO) – Chief Minister’s Office

In particular, the primary respondent in your case is the PIO within the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO). As per the latest records for the RTI Cell and Public Grievance sections:

Detail	Information
Concerned PIO	Shri Vinod Sharma (Section Officer, Public Grievances-3)
Additional PIO (RTI Cell)	Shri Sanjay Chaturvedi (Section Officer, RTI Cell)
Office Address	Room No. 303 (Vinod Sharma) / 328 (Sanjay Chaturvedi). Third Floor, Lok Bhawan, Lucknow – 226001.
Telephone Number	0522-2226459 (Public Grievances-3) / 0522-2226455 (RTI Cell)
Email Address	cmup@nic.in (General CMO) / soochna-up@nic.in (Information Dept)
Official Website	upcmo.up.nic.in

---

2. Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission (UPSIC)

In addition, this is the appellate authority where your second appeal is being heard (Hearing Room No. S-1).

Detail	Information
Office Address	7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh – 226010
General Helpline	0522-2724930
Hearing Room S-1 Email	hearingcourts1.upic@up.gov.in (For submitting written statements/rejoinders)
Commission Email	webmaster-upic@up.gov.in
Web Link (Status)	upsic.up.gov.in

---

3. Technical Helpdesk (Online RTI Portal)

Alternatively, if you are tracking the status or filing further documentation through the Uttar Pradesh Online RTI portal:

Detail	Information
Portal Link	rtionline.up.gov.in
Technical Helpline	0522-7118629 (10:00 AM – 5:00 PM)
Support Email	onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in

---

Summary of Case IDs for Reference

To ensure your communication reaches the correct desk, always quote these identifiers:

• Case/File Numbers: S01/A/0195/2025 and S01/A/0196/2025
• Original Registration No: DOCMO/R/2024/61566
• First Appeal No: DOCMO/A/2024/60176
• Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date: 20th May 2025

Would you like me to help you draft a formal letter or a rejoinder?r to the State Information Commission regarding the CMO’s request for exemption from the hearing?

Related Posts Uttar Pradesh Hearing Date Set for RTI

• Committee Set Up to Check Corruption in Lucknow
• Transparency in Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
• Transactions Without OTP & RBI: Are Consumers Safe?
• How to Address Non-Refund Issues with Facebook India
• CMO Prayagraj Under Scrutiny for Misleading Reports