Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice inspires many as a powerful symbol of resilience and determination, especially in the face of adversity. Kamlesh Singh learned that someone had unlawfully seized his ancestral land, so he immediately started his battle for justice to reclaim his rights. Furthermore, he mobilised support from local communities and advocacy groups. As a result, Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice quickly gained momentum through legal action and public awareness campaigns. These efforts highlighted the broader implications of land grabbing. His determined actions underscore the struggles that many people face in similar situations. Therefore, he calls for stronger protections and policies to safeguard landowners’ rights and promote social justice for marginalised individuals.

Key takeaways from this blog post

Based on the detailed account of the grievance, here are the key takeaways regarding the dispute involving Registration No: GOVUP/E/2025/0064331:

• Allegations of Police Misconduct: Kamlesh Singh accuses the Station House Officer (SHO) of Jigna Police Station of ‘anarchy’ (disorder or lack of legal restraint) and partiality (favouritism). He asserts that the police allowed the opposing party to take possession and begin construction, even though they previously promised to maintain the status quo. Consequently, this perceived partiality sparked deeper concerns about the rule of law and fairness.
• Confirmed Stamp Duty Evasion: The Assistant Inspector General of Registration (Mirzapur) confirmed “stamp theft” after conducting official investigations. Authorities filed two cases (D202316530000370 and D2023165000370) to recover a total of ₹2,73,640 in unpaid duties and fees from the purchasers and sellers. Therefore, the financial irregularities in this case further complicate the legal proceedings.
• Pending Judicial Adjudication: The Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Sadar, is currently hearing the land title litigation. Kamlesh Singh argues that until the authorities legally finalise mutation proceedings, neither party should alter the site or take possession of it. As a result, he urges the court to uphold the principle of non-interference.

Conclusive

• The “Right to Reason”: Kamlesh Singh centrally demands administrative transparency in this grievance. He insists that the police must provide the legal basis or court order that authorises them to permit construction on land currently involved in both civil litigation and a government recovery case. Moreover, he highlights the urgent need for clarity and accountability in such official actions.
• The complainant seeks a direct order from the Chief Minister’s Secretariat to halt all work on the site—including installation of stones and fencing—to prevent escalation and protect the pending Revenue Court decision.
• The case now involves Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) at the UP Secretariat, which indicates the seriousness of administrative accountability concerns that extend far beyond a local dispute. Thus, the escalation underscores the widespread implications of Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice.

This post offers a structured analysis of Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice, examining the land dispute, allegations of administrative negligence, and stamp duty evasion in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh.

---

Police Accountability and Land Law: The Case of Jigna Police Station

This case centres on Shri Kamlesh Singh’s grievance against the Jigna Police, highlighting the main argument: that local law enforcement failed in their duty of neutrality during a contentious land dispute in District Mirzapur. Singh’s allegations of police ‘anarchy’ and unauthorised transfer of land possession underscore the broader problem of enforcing property rights amidst administrative partiality.

1. The Core Dispute: Allegations of Police Overreach

The complainant, Kamlesh Singh, has raised serious questions regarding the conduct of the SHO of Jigna Police Station. Central to this grievance is the question of legal authority. Under Indian law, the police maintain law and order but do not adjudicate land titles or determine the validity of possession in civil disputes.

Mr Singh alleges that the SHO allowed certain individuals to take possession of and begin construction on a “controversial land” despite previous assurances that no work would proceed. The grievance raises a fundamental question: By whose authority did the police permit the grab? Without an order from a competent civil or revenue court, the courts often view police intervention to facilitate a change in possession as an overstepping of jurisdictional boundaries.

2. The Legal Status of Disputed Land and Mutation

A critical point of contention in this case is the status of the land’s mutation (the transfer of title in local municipal records). Mr Singh argues that:

• Litigation is currently pending in various courts, including the court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Sadar.
• The land in question is ‘ancestral property’ (land inherited from the family) allegedly sold by Raghuvar Dayal Singh to his relatives (son-in-law and daughter-in-law).
• Legal Precedent: Landowners should not forcibly alter possession of land until they finalise mutation proceedings and the court issues a definitive decree.

The complainant is demanding a ‘Right to Reason’—an important rule in administrative law (laws governing government processes)—asking the police to explain how they determined the mutation was complete and why they allowed construction to begin.

---

3. The Shadow of Stamp Duty Theft (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

The most serious legal problem in this case involves the Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Mirzapur. Investigations have confirmed a significant ‘theft of stamp duty’ (failure to pay government tax on the sale of property) involving the sellers and buyers of the land.

Summary of Stamp Duty Evasion (Case Details)

Based on site inspections conducted on April 21, 2023, the following discrepancies were recorded: (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

D202316530000370	Stamp Duty & Reg. Fee	₹2,29,640	Recovery Pending
D2023165000370	Stamp Duty & Settlement	₹44,000	Recovery Pending
Total Recovery		₹2,73,640

These cases suggest the registration deed is tainted by financial irregularities. Mr Singh contends that while the government is pursuing these alleged offenders for revenue loss, those accused should not benefit from a disputed and improperly registered deed.

4. Specific Incidents of Conflict

The grievance details a specific timeline of events that fueled the current tension: (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

• A bore-well constructed by Jay Dhir Singh was previously stopped by police intervention. The complainant now alleges the police have ignored similar activities.
• Encroachment Tactics: Dilip Singh is allegedly trying to mark off the land as his by surrounding it with stones and wire. (Encroachment means gradually taking over someone else’s property.)
• Harassment: The complainant has requested that the Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur, take action against Dilip Singh for “hurling abuses” and creating a hostile environment.

5. The Moral and Legal Duty of the Police (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

In land disputes, police actions usually follow Sections 145 and 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), the main Indian law governing criminal processes, which has now been updated to the BNSS. These rules let police act to stop violence, but generally they must not allow anyone to change possession or use of property (must keep the status quo) until a court decides who is the rightful owner.

Mr Singh demands neutrality. As the Revenue Court has yet to decide on ownership or the validity of the sale—especially with stamp duty cases pending—the police’s alleged support for purchasers’ construction bypasses the judicial process.rocess.

6. Current Status and Administrative Movement

The grievance was officially received by the Chief Minister’s Secretariat on June 13, 2025, and has been forwarded to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary).(Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

The file’s movement to the Secretariat signals serious concern over alleged local police misconduct. The complainant seeks a directive for Jigna Police to halt all construction and await the Revenue Court’s verdict.

---

Conclusion: Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice – The Path Forward

Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice clearly exemplifies the main argument. Without transparency and enforcement of legal protections, citizens inevitably face significant obstacles. In particular, these challenges arise when police and administrative failures intersect with complex land-ownership disputes.

The Mirzapur administration and the UP Police now face the task of answering:

1. Why was construction allowed on land with pending litigation?
2. What steps are being taken to recover the ₹2.74 Lakhs in evaded stamp duty?
3. Will the SHO Jigna be held accountable for the alleged lack of transparency?

The resolution of Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice will be a litmus test for the “zero-tolerance” policy against administrative negligence in Uttar Pradesh.

To ensure you have the correct channels for follow-up and legal escalation, here are the official contact details for the relevant authorities regarding your grievance.

---

1. State Level: Chief Minister’s Secretariat

This is the highest administrative office in Uttar Pradesh where your grievance has been forwarded.

Joint Secretary (CM Office)	Shri Arvind Mohan	0522-2226350	arvind.12574@gov.in
Chief Secretary (UP)	Shri Shashi Prakash Goyal	0522-2238212	cs-up@nic.in
CM Helpline (24/7)	N/A	1076	jansunwai-up@gov.in

Address: Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lok Bhawan, Lucknow – 226001.

---

2. District Level: Mirzapur Police & Administration

Since the grievance concerns the “anarchy” at a specific police station, the senior officers who oversee the SHO of Jigna are responsible. (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

SP Mirzapur	DIG/SSP	9454400299	spmzr-up@nic.in
ASP City	Addl. SP	9454401104	asp-city.mi@up.gov.in
CO Lalganj	Circle Officer	9454401592	co-lalganj.mi@up.gov.in
District Magistrate	DM Mirzapur	9454417567	dmmir@nic.in

Police Station Jigna:

• Landline: 05442-236011
• SHO Jigna (CUG): 9454404006

---

3. Department of Registration (Stamp Duty Cases) (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

For matters related to the pending stamp duty theft cases (D202316530000370 and D2023165000370):

• Assistant Inspector General (AIG) Registration, Mirzapur: * Phone: 05442-252108 (District Office)
• IG Registration Headquarters (Prayagraj): * Phone: 0532-2623667
  • Web Link: igrsup.gov.in

---

4. Web Links for Tracking & Evidence (Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice)

• Official Grievance Portal (IGRS): jansunwai.up.nic.in
• Revenue Court Case Status:vaad.up.nic.in
  • Use this to monitor the specific litigation mentioned in your description.
• Stamp Evasion Search: igrsup.gov.in/igrsup/stampTheftSearch

---

Next Step: Since the status is currently “Grievance Received”. Would you like me to draft a formal email to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) that specifically highlights the SHO’s failure to maintain the status quo despite the pending stamp duty cases?