🚨Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft: A Citizen’s Fight for Stamp Duty Recovery in Mirzapur 🇮🇳

The misuse of public funds poses a significant threat to state revenue. Evasion of stamp duty greatly damages public trust. The case filed by Kamlesh Singh in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, highlights a concerning instance of alleged stamp duty theft. Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft is essential to restore trust and ensure proper revenue collection. It shows the subsequent struggle for transparency and recovery from the concerned government departments.

---

🔍 The Details of the RTI Application (Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft)

On July 6, 2025, Kamlesh Singh submitted an RTI request titled “Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft.” The registration number is DMOMR/R/2025/60139. It was submitted to the District Magistrate Office Mirzapur. He sought information about the status of recovering stolen stamp duty. The application directed to the Public Information Officer (PIO), Hemant Kumar, Tehsildar, Tehsil Sadar.

The core of the RTI request stems from previous complaints filed by Kamlesh Singh. These include a Jansunwai Portal complaint (60000230077406) about the alleged theft of stamp duty. This alleged theft occurred in two different property transactions. The applicant noted the frustrating lack of cooperation from the Tehsil Sadar and Stamp Department staff in providing recovery information.

---

💰 The Two Cases of Under-Valuation (Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft)

Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft: The RTI details two separate incidents of under-valuation in property registration. This led to a significant loss of stamp duty and registration fees for the state government. The Revenue Council officially noted these thefts. They were recorded on their website. This led to the initiation of recovery proceedings.

Case 1: Recovery Amounting to ₹2,29,640

• Account Sheet Numbers: 13783/2021 and 13784/2021 (partial)
• Parties Involved (Alleged Buyer & Seller): Raghuvar Dayal Singh (S/o Late Bhanu Pratap Singh) and Priya Singh (W/o Dilip Singh).
• Theft Traced: The Deputy Registrar Sadar’s inspection on April 21, 2023, confirmed a reduction stamp duty of ₹1,90,750/-. It also confirmed a reduction registration fee of ₹38,890/-.
• Total Reduction/Theft: ₹2,29,640/- (Rupees Two Lakh Twenty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Forty).
• Revenue Council Case Number: D202316530000370

Case 2: Recovery Amounting to ₹44,000

• Account Sheet Number: 13784/2021 (partial)
• Parties Involved (Alleged Buyer & Seller): Raghuvar Dayal Singh (S/o Late Bhanu Pratap Singh) and Rita Singh (W/o Jaydheer Singh).
• Theft Traced: The inspection confirmed a reduction stamp duty of ₹36,050/- and a reduction settlement fee of ₹7,950/-.
• Total Reduction/Theft: ₹44,000/- (Rupees Forty-Four Thousand).
• Revenue Council Case Number: D2023165000370

---

❓ The Information Sought: Status of Recovery

Kamlesh Singh’s RTI request is clear. It demands a point-wise update on the steps the government has taken to recover the stolen amounts.

The core questions for both Case 1 and Case 2 are:

1. What is the current status of the recovery of the penalty/deficient duty from the concerned buyer and seller?
2. If the purchaser and seller have denied paying the penalty/deficient duty, what action has the concerned staff taken? What has the Government of Uttar Pradesh done in response?

These questions are crucial because they move the administrative process from simply tracing the theft to enforcing the financial recovery.

---

🏛️ The Role of the Revenue Council and Registration Department (Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft)

The Deputy Registrar Sadar performed the initial investigation of the under-valuation. The documentation specified the Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Mirzapur (Krishna Kumar Yadav).

The information provided in the RTI shows that the Revenue Council’s website recorded the matter. This shows that authorities have started the formal legal proceedings for recovery. They are acting under the relevant sections of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

Under this Act, when a document shows undervaluation, the parties liable to pay the stamp duty must take action. They must recover the deficient amount. Uncovering stamp duty theft is essential, as it may reveal discrepancies that require rectification. A penalty may accompany this recovery, potentially reaching up to ten times the deficient duty, although it is usually less. The buyer typically holds the liability, but sometimes both parties share accountability.

The recording of the cases (D202316530000370 and D2023165000370) on the Revenue Council’s platform signifies an important development. The cases have moved into the adjudication phase. They have also moved into the recovery phase. The recovery of such dues often involves the issuance of a recovery certificate to the Tehsildar. The Tehsildar then proceeds to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue. This makes the PIO, Tehsildar Hemant Kumar, the most appropriate officer. He can provide the status of the actual collection of the recovery amount. His office is responsible for execution. Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft

---

🛣️ The Way Forward: Ensuring Accountability

Kamlesh Singh’s efforts underscore the vital role of the Right to Information Act, 2005, in holding public servants accountable. A complaint that staff members are “running away from providing information” is serious. It suggests a possible cover-up or negligence in executing the recovery order.

The successful recovery of the combined ₹2,73,640/- is crucial. It is necessary to uphold the rule of law. It will also deter future instances of stamp duty evasion. Should the Tehsildar fail to provide the requested information, Kamlesh Singh can file a First Appeal under the RTI Act. This appeal goes to the designated Appellate Authority. He can escalate the matter until the public funds’ status is clarified. The disclosure of the recovery status must be prompt and transparent. This step is necessary to conclude this chapter of the investigation.

The recovery of stamp duty involves several key departments in Uttar Pradesh. Based on the details provided in your RTI request, we identified the relevant offices. Our general knowledge of the administrative structure also helped. Here are the contact details for the offices concerned with the case. These include the Revenue Council, the Tehsildar, and the Stamp & Registration Department.

📞 Key Contact Details for Stamp Duty Recovery Case

1. The Concerned PIO (Tehsil Sadar, Mirzapur)

The Tehsildar’s office is typically responsible for executing recovery orders (known as a Recovery Certificate or R.C.) issued by the Revenue Court/Revenue Council for arrears of land revenue, which includes deficient stamp duty.

Official	Designation	Mobile Number	Email ID
Hemant Kumar	Tehsildar (PIO)	9454416823	teh-sadar[dot]mi[at]up[dot]gov[dot]in
Tehsildar Office	Sadar, Mirzapur	05442-220188 (General Office Number)	(Not explicitly provided for Sadar Mirzapur)

2. District Magistrate Office, Mirzapur (Nodal Authority)

The applicant filed the RTI with the Public Authority. The Nodal Officer oversees the RTI process for the District Magistrate’s office.

Official	Designation	Mobile Number	Email ID
AJAY KUMAR SINGH	Nodal Officer	8756844195	shakti[dot]3916[at]up[dot]gov[dot]in

3. Inspector General of Registration (IGR) / Stamp & Registration Department (Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft)

This department determines the initial stamp duty theft and refers the case for recovery. The Inspector General Registration (IGR) received the original letter dated October 17, 2023.

Official / Office	Designation	Contact Details	Web Link
Office of IGR	Inspector General of Registration, U.P., Lucknow	Phone: 0522-2308697	igrsup.gov.in
IGR Email	(For Registration matters)	ig.sr[at]nic[dot]in
Helpline	Citizen Services/Helpline	1800 180 1476 (Toll-Free)

4. Revenue Council, Uttar Pradesh (Board of Revenue)

The Revenue Council recorded the deficient duty under case numbers D202316530000370 and D2023165000370. This is the highest revenue court in the state.

Office / Service	Contact Details	Web Link
Board of Revenue, UP (Lucknow)	Chairman Office: 0522-2217102	bor.up.nic.in
Case Search Link	Revenue Court Management System	vaad.up.nic.in
General Email	(For technical queries)	borlko[at]nic[dot]in

---

🌐 How to Track the Case Online

You can attempt to check the status of the revenue recovery case using the links above:

1. Visit the Revenue Court Management System website: vaad.up.nic.in/Search_CaseNo_Wise.aspx
2. Select the relevant options (e.g., जनपद/District -> Mirzapur, तहसील/Tehsil -> Sadar, etc.).
3. Enter the Stamp Case Numbers: D202316530000370 and D2023165000370 to see the current status of the recovery proceedings.

Would you like me to search for the specific First Appellate Authority for your RTI (DMOMR/R/2025/60139)? This will help you file an appeal if the Tehsildar does not respond.

Kamlesh Singh submitted appeal against PIO Inspector General Registration, U.P. Lucknow