Struggle of Mahima Maurya to seek justice. Status of case of Mahima Maurya in UPHRC Lucknow.

Based on the legal and administrative records provided, here is a structured blog post detailing the ongoing struggle of Mahima Maurya for justice and the current status of her case within the human rights framework.


Justice Delayed: The Persistent Struggle of Mahima Maurya Against Abuse of Power

The quest for justice in India can often feel like a labyrinth of paperwork, bureaucratic hand-offs, and administrative waiting rooms. For Mahima Maurya, a resident of Village Gorsar Sarpati in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, this struggle began on September 14, 2024. What started as an incident of alleged police inaction has evolved into a significant legal pursuit through the State and National Human Rights Commissions.

1. The Core Issue: Alleged Abuse of Power

The root of Mahima Maurya’s grievance lies in a fundamental failure of the local law enforcement machinery. According to her complaint (Diary No. 4672/IN/2024), the primary incident involves:

  • Failure to Register an FIR: Despite seeking legal recourse following an incident in September 2024, the local police allegedly refused to register a First Information Report (FIR).1
  • Abuse of Power: The case is categorized under “Abuse of Power,” highlighting a systemic breakdown where those meant to protect the law are accused of obstructing it.

2. The Role of UPHRC Lucknow

Seeking intervention, Mahima Maurya approached the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC) in Lucknow. The Commission officially registered her complaint on October 17, 2024.

The Commission’s Directive

On October 21, 2024, the UPHRC issued a specific directive to the Superintendent of Police (SP), Mirzapur. The proceeding stated:

“The Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur shall look into the matter and do the needful in accordance with law at his end within six weeks with the intimation to the complainant.

While the Commission “disposed” of the case at their level, they did so by transferring the burden of action directly onto the Mirzapur police leadership, mandating a 42-day window for a resolution and a report back to the victim.

3. Escalation to the National Level (NHRC)

As of April 2025, the case has seen further movement through the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in New Delhi. Recent records show that subsequent filings (Diary No. 2149/IN/2025 and 309/IN/2025) have been officially linked to the main case file.

This “linking” of cases ensures that all supplementary evidence and additional complaints regarding the same incident are treated as a single, comprehensive legal matter (Case/File No: 14054/24/55/2024).

4. Current Status Summary

DetailStatus Information
Main Case No.14054/24/55/2024
Current StageDisposed with Directions to SP Mirzapur
Primary AuthoritySuperintendent of Police, Mirzapur
Latest UpdateNHRC linked new diary entries as of April 15, 2025

5. The Road Ahead: Seeking Accountability

The current status of “Disposed with Directions” means the Human Rights Commission has completed its initial review and has ordered the local police to act. However, for Mahima Maurya, the struggle continues until:

  1. The Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, provides a formal response.
  2. The underlying incident is investigated fairly.
  3. Legal accountability is established for the initial refusal to file an FIR.

Mahima’s case serves as a stark reminder of the hurdles ordinary citizens face when the systems designed to provide justice become the very obstacles that prevent it.

This email serves as a formal Non-Compliance Petition addressed to the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission (UPHRC). It highlights a critical breakdown in the administrative process: the failure of the Mirzapur Police to act on a direct order from the Commission.

Below is a structured breakdown of the petition and its legal significance for your records.


Petition Summary: Mahima Maurya vs. SP Mirzapur

Subject: Failure to comply with UPHRC directions in Case No. 14054/24/55/2024.

1. The Timeline of Inaction

The core of this petition is the “Six-Week Window” that was ignored by local authorities.

2. Key Legal Arguments Raised

The petition leverages specific legal precedents to show that the police are not just being slow, but are acting unlawfully:

3. Critical Failures Highlighted

Failure PointImpact on the Case
No Testimony RecordedWithout the complainant’s official statement, the “investigation” mentioned in the order cannot legally begin.
Lack of IntimationThe complainant has been left in the dark, violating the Commission’s specific instruction to keep her informed.
Abuse of PowerThe original complaint was about police inaction; the current non-compliance reinforces that original “Abuse of Power” claim.

What This Petition Seeks (The “Prayer”)

The petition asks the UPHRC to move from “Gentle Directions” to “Stringent Enforcement”:

  1. Show-Cause Notice: Demanding the SP explain why they ignored the order.
  2. Strict Timeline: Setting a new, non-negotiable deadline for registering the FIR.
  3. Statement Recording: Forcing the Circle Officer (CO) or SP to finally meet with Mahima Maurya to record the evidence.

Recommended Next Steps

Since you have already sent this email to the UPHRC, the “ball” is now in their court to issue a summons or a reminder.

Would you like me to help you draft a follow-up “RTI (Right to Information) Request” to the Mirzapur Police Headquarters? This would legally force them to provide a written status update on why the UPHRC order was not implemented, which can be used as further evidence of their negligence.

Based on the legal documents and the non-compliance petition you have provided, here is the consolidated data sequence for your case records. This structure organizes your digital identity and contact information as it relates to the various portals where your case is active.


📂 Case Identification & Portal Links

AuthorityApplication / Case IDWeb Portal Link
SHRC Uttar PradeshCase No: 14054/24/55/2024uphrc.up.nic.in
NHRC IndiaDiary No: 2149/IN/2025nhrc.nic.in/status
Official EmailCase Correspondencemail.google.com

📧 Contact Data Sequence

  • Primary Email: mahimamauryagonasar@gmail.com
  • Secondary/Linked Email: nhrc.india@nic.in (For receiving automated status alerts)
  • Mobile Number: +91-9198010433
  • Alternate Official Contact (UPHRC): uphrclko@yahoo.co.in

📈 Administrative Timeline (Data Tracking)

  1. 17/10/2024: Case Registered (UPHRC).
  2. 21/10/2024: Order issued to SP Mirzapur (Action No. 1).
  3. 15/04/2025: NHRC New Delhi acknowledges and links the case.
  4. 29/11/2025: Non-Compliance Petition filed via email due to lack of Action Taken Report (ATR).

🛠️ Verification Checklist

To ensure your digital follow-ups are successful, please verify the following:

  • Check NHRC Status: Use Case No. 14054/24/55/2024 on the HRCNet Portal.
  • Email Receipt: Ensure you have the “Sent” receipt for the Nov 29, 2025, email to uphrclko@yahoo.co.in.
  • Spam Folder: Periodically check your Gmail for replies from .nic.in or .gov.in domains, as these can sometimes be filtered incorrectly.

Would you like me to help you generate a PDF summary of these IDs and links to keep as a quick-reference “Case Dashboard” on your phone?

Home » Case Status of Mahima Maurya: SHRC Uttar Pradesh

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

  1. Arun Pratap Singh's avatar
  2. Preeti Singh's avatar
  3. Yogi M. P. Singh's avatar
  4. Yogi M. P. Singh's avatar
  5. Preeti Singh's avatar

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender, Anti-corruption Crusader & RTI Activist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading