A grievance against Mirzapur Police reveals how an NCR, not an FIR, stalled justice for Mahima Maurya after a violent assault in Vindhyachal. On September 14, 2024, a family dispute turned violent, leaving Mahima with serious injuries, including what she says was a fractured thumb missed during her initial medical exam. Instead of registering a First Information Report, Vindhyachal police filed a Non-Cognizable Report, a technicality that blocked arrest or investigation without a magistrate’s order and shifted the burden of pursuing justice onto the victim herself. Mahima also alleges police pressured her with repeated phone calls and labeled her a “habitual complainant” for continuing to seek accountability. One of her two grievances remains open with the Chief Minister’s Secretariat in Lucknow, keeping the case alive despite the local station’s attempts to close it.

Key Takeaways

• NCR instead of FIR blocked accountability. Police filed a Non-Cognizable Report rather than a First Information Report for a violent assault, which meant they couldn’t arrest the accused or investigate without a magistrate’s order — shifting the burden of pursuing justice onto Mahima herself.
• Medical evidence is disputed. Police called her injuries “simple” and found no fractures in the initial exam (no X-ray was taken), but a later hospital visit in Prayagraj reportedly found a fractured thumb — which police then dismissed as “fabricated.
• Alleged intimidation followed her complaints. Mahima says police made repeated “irritating phone calls” pressuring her to stop filing grievances, and officially labeled her a “habitual complainant.
• Record-keeping discrepancies raise cover-up concerns. The NCR and government diary reportedly misidentify those involved, and a head injury near her eye was classified as “simple” despite its location.
• The case has reached the state level. One grievance was closed by local police, but the other has been escalated to the Chief Minister’s Secretariat in Lucknow — showing the complaint hasn’t been fully silenced.
• The core demand is third-party accountability. Mahima is asking for a transparent, independent inquiry rather than a self-investigation by the same police station she’s complaining about.

Grievance Against Mirzapur Police: The Legal Battle of Mahima Maurya

Justice in rural India often means a long fight against bureaucratic hurdles and systemic indifference. In fact, power usually favors the influential. Mahima Maurya is a resident of Godsar Sarapatti, Vindhyachal, Mirzapur, and her grievance against Mirzapur Police has become a case study in that struggle. She calls it “police arbitrariness and tyranny.” So far, she has filed two grievances on the Uttar Pradesh Jansunwai portal: GOVUP/E/2024/0088341 and GOVUP/E/2024/0082409. Together, they tell a troubling story. A violence victim finds herself pitted against the institution meant to protect her.

---

The Genesis of the Conflict: A Family Dispute Turned Violent

The trouble began on September 14, 2024. Mahima’s husband, Pramod Kumar Kushwaha, got into a physical fight with his brother, Manoj Kumar Kushwaha. According to police records, the fight traces back to an “old rivalry.” However, Mahima’s grievance against Mirzapur Police centers on what happened next.

She says the opposing party “mercilessly beat” her, causing serious injuries. Afterward, police sent her for a medical exam at the Community Health Centre (CHC) Vindhyachal. Still, how officials classified the incident became the real flashpoint.

NCR vs. FIR: The Technicality Behind the Grievance Against Mirzapur Police

Under Indian criminal procedure, serious, cognizable offenses require police to register a First Information Report (FIR). Instead, Vindhyachal police skipped that step. They filed a Non-Cognizable Report (NCR No. 104/2024) under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Key Distinction: An NCR blocks police from arresting a suspect or investigating without a magistrate’s order. Officials treated the assault on a woman as non-cognizable. Because of that, they stalled any immediate path to accountability, and the burden of pursuing justice fell entirely on the victim.

This classification sits at the heart of Mahima’s grievance against Mirzapur Police, since it determines whether the case moves forward at all.

---

The Medical Controversy: “Simple Injuries” or Hidden Fractures?

Much of Mahima’s fight centers on the medical exam she received that day. According to police, her injuries were “simple.” The initial checkup, they say, showed no fractures.

However, Mahima disputes this. Her account raises real questions about rural healthcare and police procedure:

• Lack of X-Rays: For one, the CHC never ordered an X-ray, even though one is essential for spotting internal fractures.
• Subsequent Discovery: Later, a specialized hospital in Prayagraj found a fracture in her thumb.
• The Police Allegation: In response, police called her fracture claim “fabricated.” They suggest she’s using an old or unrelated injury to pressure them into filing a more serious case — a move Mahima calls “victim-blaming.”

---

Allegations of Intimidation Behind the Grievance Against Mirzapur Police

Perhaps the most alarming part of this story is how police allegedly behaved next. That’s after Mahima started pursuing justice through government portals.

“Irritating Phone Calls” and Pressure

Specifically, in grievance GOVUP/E/2024/0082409, Mahima says police personnel made “irritating phone calls.” She says these calls pressured her to stop filing complaints on the portal. Consequently, she recorded the conversations as evidence of what she calls police “arbitrariness and tyranny.”

The “Habitual Complainant” Label

Meanwhile, police officially labeled Mahima someone “in the habit of giving applications repeatedly.” This came despite telling her to seek relief through the courts instead. Often, officials use this label to dismiss persistent whistleblowers and victims. These are people who refuse to accept a closed case as the final word.

---

Discrepancies in the Public Record

In addition, Mahima’s grievance against Mirzapur Police points to several inconsistencies. She believes these signal a cover-up:

1. Identity Errors: For instance, the NCR and government diary describe the wrong people. They focus on others who weren’t even present at the scene, not on Mahima, the actual victim.
2. Severity of Injury: Furthermore, officials dismissed a 3 cm x 0.3 cm x 0.5 cm head injury near her eye as “simple.” Yet Mahima argues that an assault on such a sensitive body part shows clear intent to cause serious harm. Therefore, it should have triggered more stringent legal sections.
3. Arrest and Bail Timelines: Finally, she has demanded a clear timeline. When did police produce the offenders before a magistrate, and when did they grant bail? Overall, she’s questioning whether the process followed proper diligence.

---

The Status of the Grievance Against Mirzapur Police

As of December 2024, Mahima’s complaints show a mixed picture:

• On one hand, officials marked Grievance 0082409 as “Case Closed.” Police maintain the injuries were simple and that Mahima is only trying to apply pressure.
• On the other hand, Grievance 0088341 remains “Received.” It now sits with the Joint Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat, Lucknow.

Ultimately, the case reaching the Chief Minister’s Secretariat shows one thing clearly. Local police haven’t silenced this complainant by trying to close the matter.

---

Conclusion: A Call for Accountability

Above all, this grievance against Mirzapur Police goes beyond a family feud. It’s about holding the department accountable. Mahima says police ignored her medical reports and harassed her for seeking justice. Therefore, a mere “investigation report” from the same station she’s complaining about isn’t enough to settle that.

Her demand is simple: fix accountability. If her documents are fake, she says she’ll face the consequences. But if police failed to investigate a bone fracture and protect a woman from harassment, officials need to fix accountability on the officers involved.

In short, two promises need to mean something: the slogan “Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao” and the Chief Minister’s pledge of a “crime-free Uttar Pradesh.” That means women like Mahima Maurya, and every grievance against Mirzapur Police like hers, need transparent, third-party inquiries — not dismissive labels and “irritating” phone calls.d-party inquiries — not dismissive labels and “irritating” phone calls.urya need transparent, third-party inquiries — not dismissive labels and “irritating” phone calls.r’s Office based on these grievances?