🚨 System Failure: Why Uttar Pradesh’s RTI Online Portal is Undermining Transparency and Good Governance

---

The right to information (RTI) is the cornerstone of a functional democracy, empowering citizens to hold their government accountable. In Uttar Pradesh, the digital gateway to this fundamental right—the UP RTI Online Portal—is failing spectacularly. Far from simplifying the process, the portal is riddled with technical errors, glaring usability flaws, and, most worryingly, appears to be suffering from administrative neglect.

This detailed breakdown, drawing from a formal grievance submitted (PMOPG/E/2025/0011417), exposes how the platform, an initiative meant to champion citizen-centric governance, is instead delivering a third-rate digital experience that actively undermines the principles of transparency and efficiency.

---

💥 Section I: The Technical Debacle—Fundamental Errors and Broken Trust

The core of the problem lies in critical technical failures that prevent citizens from completing basic tasks, such as submitting an application or making a payment. These aren’t minor bugs; they are structural flaws indicative of poor development and inadequate quality assurance.

1. The “Incorrect Column Count” – A Failure of Implementation

The most frequently cited technical error is the “DataTables warning: table id=example – Incorrect column count.” This error is not a complex server-side issue; it is a sign of sloppy front-end development and poor HTML structure.

• The Problem: The number of columns defined in the table header does not match the number of cells provided in the table body rows. This breaks the basic structure of the table, making the dynamic display of information (like appeal status) impossible for the DataTables JavaScript library.
• The Implication: DataTables is a widely used and robust tool. Its failure here points directly to an improper implementation. It suggests that the personnel responsible for updating the portal lacked the basic technical competence to validate the HTML and ensure consistent column definitions across the site’s critical data displays. For the user, it means a simple status check becomes an exercise in frustration, with the relevant data table failing to render correctly.

2. The Broken Bridge: “Bank URL Not Found” – Payment Gateway Failure

For an online portal that charges a mandatory fee for RTI applications, the payment mechanism must be flawless. However, the UP RTI portal frequently throws the severe error: “Bank URL Not Found – Rajkosh Payment Gateway having issues.”

• The Problem: This error signifies a failure in the communication link to the Rajkosh payment gateway. It can be caused by misconfigured gateway URLs, server downtime, or intermittent connectivity issues between the portal’s server and the bank’s system.
• The Fallout: Users experience failed transactions, often after they have completed the rest of the application process. While the portal may offer a boilerplate promise of reconciliation within 24–48 hours, this instability is a massive blow to user confidence. A broken payment gateway is equivalent to a closed counter window—it halts the entire service and severely undermines the public’s trust in the reliability of the government’s digital infrastructure. It forces citizens to return repeatedly, wasting time and effort.

---

🧭 Section II: Usability and Design Flaws—The Lack of Citizen-Centricity

Beyond the critical technical errors, the portal suffers from fundamental usability and design flaws that betray a clear lack of user-centric design principles.

1. The Missing Search Box: Finding a Needle in a Digital Haystack

In the Appeal Details Section, a critical area for citizens tracking their requests, there is a fundamental flaw: the complete absence of a search box.

• The Oversight: For users with numerous RTI applications or appeals, finding a specific entry requires manually scrolling through pages of records. In any contemporary digital database, a search feature is non-negotiable. Its absence is not a subtle oversight; it is a profound technical and design failure that dramatically increases the time and effort required for basic information retrieval. It demonstrates that the platform’s designers did not consider the real-world needs of active information seekers.

2. The Language Barrier: Limiting Accessibility

The mandate for government portals is to be accessible to all citizens. Yet, the English version of the Appeal Details is unavailable.

• Accessibility Issue: Uttar Pradesh is a diverse state, and the RTI process is statutory—it must be accessible to all residents, including those who are non-Hindi speakers. By locking critical information sections behind a single language, the portal fails its duty to provide multilingual support, a key requirement for any public service digital platform.

3. “Downgrade” Updates: The Peril of Poor Quality Assurance

The most disheartening observation is that recent website updates have resulted in a functional downgrade.

• The Irony: Websites are updated for improvement, stability, and better functionality. However, in the case of the UP RTI portal, recent deployments have actively introduced new bugs (like the DataTables error) and degraded the user experience. This suggests a total breakdown in the deployment pipeline, characterized by:
  • Inadequate Testing: Changes are being pushed live without thorough testing in a staging environment.
  • Lack of Quality Assurance (QA): The updates are not being checked against a core set of functionality requirements before launch.
  • This practice is not just poor; it is actively detrimental to the public service it is meant to deliver.

---

❓ Section III: Governance Concerns—The Silence of the Authorities

While technical errors can be forgiven as temporary glitches, the administrative response—or lack thereof—raises the most serious questions about accountability in governance.

Persistent Errors, Persistent Inaction

The official grievance notes that these error messages and functional failures have been ongoing for more than two weeks, yet there appears to be no visible corrective action from the responsible agencies—the NIC (National Informatics Centre) and the Department of Electronics and IT.

• Accountability Crisis: The persistence of these major, service-disrupting errors points to a fundamental lack of accountability. When a critical public portal is effectively non-functional for an extended period, it demonstrates a lackadaisical approach to the problems faced by citizens.
• The Good Governance Mandate: The combination of fundamental technical errors, poor design, and administrative negligence stands in direct contradiction to the principles of transparency, efficiency, and citizen-centric governance. In the digital age, citizens expect and deserve reliable digital platforms, especially for statutory services like the Right to Information.

Is This Acceptable in Good Governance?

The answer is unequivocally no. Providing a broken, unstable, and poorly managed portal for a fundamental statutory right is a clear dereliction of duty. It sends a message that the convenience and rights of the information seeker are a low priority.

The concerned authorities—the Chief Minister Secretariat and the responsible personnel at the Department of Electronics and IT and NIC Uttar Pradesh—must immediately acknowledge the severity of these failures. A critical and urgent overhaul is needed, not just of the code, but of the quality assurance and administrative oversight processes that allowed such a degraded service to persist.

The citizens of Uttar Pradesh deserve a reliable, efficient, and fully functional UP RTI Online Portal that supports, rather than obstructs, their constitutional right to information. Corrective action must be immediate, transparent, and lasting.

---

Grievance Status Update (PMOPG/E/2025/0011417): The grievance is currently “Under process” with an action date of 24/01/2025, addressed to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary), Chief Minister Secretariat. Public pressure must continue until these systemic failures are comprehensively resolved.

National Informatics Centre is responsible only for technical guidance

---