Here are the key takeaways from the documented construction dispute and the resulting formal grievance. This case highlights the challenges of site abandonment & legal minefield that can arise in the construction industry.

1. Contractual Obligations and Rates (Site Abandonment & Legal Minefield)

• The agreement established a labor-only construction project in Gram Nibi Gaharwar.
• Both parties agreed to a fixed labor rate of 200 Rupees per square foot.
• The contract used the Mirzapur Bhawan Nirman Karta Samiti rate list for specific technical tasks. These tasks include RCC column casting and foundation excavation.

2. Financial History and Compliance

• Pritesh Kumar (the contractor) acknowledged receiving a total of 75,000 Rupees for the project.
• The homeowner provided an initial advance of 25,000 Rupees to start the work.
• Documented payments continued through early 2026, including a major installment of 23,600 Rupees on February 12, 2026.
• Other recorded payments included 5,000 Rupees on January 12, 2026, and 5,000 Rupees on February 5, 2026.

3. Core Issues and Site Status

• Internal conflicts between the contractor and his laborers caused a total stoppage of work.
• The contractor abandoned the site, leaving the building in a state of disarray.
• Despite receiving substantial funds, the contractor refused to clear the premises, which prevented the homeowner from hiring new labor.

4. Official Government Intervention (Site Abandonment & Legal Minefield)

• The homeowner registered a formal grievance with the Uttar Pradesh Government (Registration: GOVUP/E/2026/0038451).
• Shri Arvind Mohan, Joint Secretary at the Chief Minister’s Secretariat, is currently overseeing the case.
• The complaint filed with the Vindhyachal Police Station seeks to summon the contractor. The contractor is asked to either resume work or provide a full settlement and clear the site.

The Mirzapur Construction Crisis: Why Site Abandonment is a Legal Minefield

Building a home represents a major life milestone. However, for Keshav Pratap Singh, the process has become a source of significant “mental distress. This particular case highlights how site abandonment can quickly turn into a legal minefield. This case now sits with the Chief Minister’s Secretariat under grievance number GOVUP/E/2026/0038451.

The Foundation of the 200 Rupee Agreement

The conflict began with a labour-based contract for a residence in Gram Nibi Gaharwar, Mirzapur^. Site abandonment and the legal minefield it naturally creates is often rooted in issues that begin with the contract itself. On October 12, 2025, the parties established a specific framework for the project.

Standardised Labour Rates and Expectations

Pritesh Kumar agreed to complete the construction at a rate of 200 Rupees per square foot. Furthermore, the contract incorporated the official rate list from the Mirzapur Bhawan Nirman Karta Samiti. This list defined several technical costs associated with construction. There was a looming threat of site abandonment. It also involved a legal minefield.

• Foundation Excavation: Workers charge 12 Rupees per cubic foot for ordinary soil and 20 Rupees for mixed gravel.
• RCC Column Casting: Prices range from 90 Rupees per running foot for $9^{\prime\prime}\times9^{\prime\prime}$ columns to 150 Rupees for $9^{\prime\prime}\times18^{\prime\prime}$ structures.
• Brickwork Specifics: The agreement sets foundation masonry at 25 Rupees per cubic foot for 15-inch and 18-inch widths.

---

Documented Financial Compliance and Payments

The homeowner maintained a disciplined payment schedule throughout the project’s duration^. Of course, financial compliance is crucial for avoiding both site abandonment and any potential legal minefield. Consequently, the records show a significant transfer of capital to the contractor.

Significant Capital Transfers and Advances

Pritesh Kumar acknowledged receiving a total of 75,000 Rupees for the work^. When site abandonment occurs, financial advances often become entangled in a legal minefield. Specifically, the payment history includes these key transactions:

• Initial Advance: The contractor signed for an initial sum of 25,000 Rupees.
• October 2025 Milestones: The homeowner provided 10,000 Rupees on October 1st and 35,000 Rupees on October 24th.
• November 2025 Continuity: Three additional payments totalling 35,000 Rupees reached the contractor during this month.

Final 2026 Installments

Despite the looming dispute, the homeowner continued to fund the site into the new year^. In the context of site abandonment, these payments put the homeowner squarely into the legal minefield. For example, the records highlight these final payments:

• January 12, 2026: Pritesh Kumar received 5,000 Rupees.
• February 12, 2026: The homeowner transferred a final major sum of 23,600 Rupees.

---

The Breaking Point: Abandonment and Disarray

The project faced a total collapse when the contractor decided to stop all work^. Reaching this breaking point, site abandonment was disastrous. It also became a complex legal minefield for the parties involved. Therefore, the site currently sits in a state of complete “disarray.”

Internal Labourer Conflicts and Site Neglect

Pritesh Kumar reportedly halted construction because of internal disputes with his team. Amidst these conflicts, site abandonment triggers legal risks and creates its own minefield. Although the contractor is responsible for his staff, these arguments left the building unfinished. Moreover, the contractor now refuses to clear the premises of equipment or debris.

Financial Harassment and Site Holding

This refusal prevents the homeowner from hiring a new team to finish the house. Because the homeowner already paid over 75,000 Rupees, this abandonment constitutes a significant financial loss^. As a result, being caught between site abandonment and a legal minefield often leads to formal legal action. Consequently, the lack of progress while holding onto advance funds has led to formal legal action.

---

Seeking Justice through Government Intervention

Local resolution failed. Therefore, Keshav Pratap Singh escalated the matter to the Station House Officer (SHO) at the Vindhyachal Police Station. In these circumstances, the homeowner looks for solutions to site abandonment issues. These problems have mired them in a legal minefield.

High-Level Oversight in Lucknow

Currently, Shri Arvind Mohan, Joint Secretary at the Chief Minister’s Secretariat, oversees the grievance. The government officially labelled the status as “Under Process” on March 28, 2026. This high-level attention underscores the seriousness of the contractor’s breach of contract, where site abandonment meets the legal minefield head-on.

The Road to Resolution

The homeowner’s formal prayer asks the authorities to summon Pritesh Kumar immediately. Specifically, the complaint demands that the contractor either:

1. Resume the Work: Finish the construction under the original 200 Rupees per square foot agreement.
2. Clear and Refund: Remove all obstructions from the site. Provide a full settlement for the advance payments received for uncompleted labour.

This case’s outcome will establish a new standard for residential construction accountability in Mirzapur. Site abandonment will be a central issue to address. Navigating the legal minefield will also become key in future contracts.

Based on the grievance status and the documents provided, here are the official contact details for the public authorities currently handling your case:

1. Chief Minister’s Secretariat (Lucknow) (Site Abandonment & Legal Minefield)

The Joint Secretary at the CM Secretariat is the primary officer overseeing your registered grievance.

• Concerned Officer: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
• Organisation: Uttar Pradesh
• Contact Address: Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
• Contact Number: 05222226350
• Email Address: arvind.12574[at]gov[dot]in

---

2. Local Police Authority (Mirzapur) (Site Abandonment & Legal Minefield)

The grievance is directed toward the local station for field intervention and summoning the contractor.

• Office: Station House Officer (SHO), Vindhyachal Police Station
• District: Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh
• PIN Code: 231307

---

3. Application & Reference Details

You will need these identifiers for all future correspondence or when calling the Secretariat.

• Grievance Registration Number: GOVUP/E/2026/0038451
• Date of Receipt: 28/03/2026
• Current Status: Under process
• Official Portal (Weblink): You can track the progress of your application on the Jansunwai-Samadhan portal (UP IGRS) at: https://jansunwai.up.nic.in/

---

4. Personal & Contractor Contact Summary (Site Abandonment & Legal Minefield)

• Complainant (Your) Mobile: 9794089100
• Contractor (Pritesh Kumar) Mobile: 6393878790
• Secondary Contractor Number (from Document): 9260966943