A grievance against police in land grabbing case at Lalganj, Mirzapur has once again exposed how fragile public trust in Uttar Pradesh has become. Land mafia elements watch the homes of OLDER residents who have no legal heirs. They wait, and then they seize the property the moment the owner dies. Shivam Gupta filed his complaint under Grievance Registration No. GOVUP/E/2025/0020413, naming three men as the offenders. Yet the General Diary of Lalganj Police Station tells a different story. It records preventive action against the complainant himself, while the named land grabbers stay conspicuously absent. This grievance against police in land grabbing case therefore raises a question about partiality, portal misuse and the alleged nexus between revenue officials and criminals. Mirzapur needs an independent inquiry, and it needs one now.

🚨 The Vulture’s Eye: Land Mafia Menace and Accountability Crisis in Mirzapur 🚨

Public trust in Uttar Pradesh now faces a severe test. This is especially true in the quieter corners of districts like Mirzapur. Land mafia gangs operate freely there. Moreover, local governance offers little transparency or accountability. Together, these two problems threaten the rights and security of vulnerable citizens. The situation under the Lalganj Police Station therefore serves as a stark case study. It demands immediate, high-level intervention.

---

The Modus Operandi: Targeting the Vulnerable

The problem starts with the predatory activities of local land mafia elements. They prefer one type of target: the homes of older people who have no legal heirs. Such residents already live in isolation. As a result, they make an easy mark. The strategy is cold and calculated. First, the gang observes the household. Then it waits. Finally, it seizes the property the moment the owner dies.

The complaint filed by Shivam Gupta (Grievance Registration No.: GOVUP/E/2025/0020413) brings this menace into sharp focus. It names Vinod Kumar alias doctor S/O Rama Shankar Patel and Deenu S/O Rama Shankar Patel as the offenders. Furthermore, it names Rama Shankar Patel of Charki Bagariya as the mastermind who directs them. According to the complaint, these men use intimidation, threats and criminal force. In this way, they push poor dwellers out of their ancestral homes.

The property in this specific grievance is the ancestral house of the complainant’s maternal grandmother. In other words, this is not a dispute over unoccupied public land. It is a targeted attempt to seize a family home. Consequently, it shows just how brazen and personal these criminal enterprises have become.

---

🛡️ The Shield of Corruption: A Systemic Failure

Why does the land mafia grow so formidable? Above all, because it allegedly enjoys patronage from within public offices. The grievance points directly to a nexus between the land grabbers and two arms of the state. These are the Police and the Department of Revenue, and specifically the Lekhpal and Revenue Inspector of Tehsil Lalganj.

This alleged corruption shows itself in two critical ways:

1. Direct collusion. Officials shield the land grabbers, so the gang operates with impunity.
2. Abuse of public grievance portals. Corrupt officers allegedly file arbitrary and misleading reports on the Public Grievance Portal of the Government of India. In addition, they misuse the Jansunwai Portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. This practice creates a digital dead end for genuine complaints. Ultimately, it silences the aggrieved citizen.

Shivam Gupta also alleges misuse of legal procedure. Someone, he says, forged his name on an application in order to suppress his own complaint.

---

📄 The Smoking Gun: Analysis of Police Action (Grievance Against Police in Land Grabbing)

The grievance against the authorities’ actions rests on one document. That document is the General Diary (G.D. No. 034, dated 22/01/2025) of Lalganj Police Station.

The diary records a preventive step by S.I. Shriram Singh and his team:

• Action taken: the team filed a challan report to maintain peace. It cited Section 126/135 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) against two opposing parties.
• Parties challenged:
  • First party: Anar Kali (wife of Rajkumar Gupta) and Shivam Gupta (son of Rajkumar Gupta).
  • Second party: Kanhaiyalal (son of late Munni Lal).

Critical discrepancies and allegations of partiality: (Grievance Against Police in Land Grabbing)

1. The actual offenders vanish. The complainant named three main land grabbers — Vinod Kumar, Deenu and Rama Shankar Patel. Yet the diary leaves all three out of the preventive action.
2. The victims become the accused. The report instead lists Shivam Gupta and his relative as the ‘first party’. In short, the police acted against the very people trying to protect their ancestral property.
3. The compromise statement. The complainant asks a pointed question about a ‘compromise statement’ that the Circle Officer (CO) Lalganj reportedly attached to his report. That agreement, he argues, names the parties in controversy quite clearly. Even so, the police still protected the land mafia. He therefore calls it a plain “nexus between the police and the land mafia with support of the Department of Revenue.”

Such selective policing ignores the reported aggressors. Meanwhile, it proceeds against the alleged victims. The complaint calls this “cryptic action”. It points, he argues, to partiality and to deep-seated corruption that shields the criminal elements.

---

📞 The Road to Integrity: Urgent Call for Action (Grievance Against Police in Land Grabbing)

This situation goes well beyond a single property dispute. Rather, it signals a serious erosion of the rule of law. Citizens now see state machinery, including the police and the revenue department, in caucus with criminals. As a result, every vulnerable resident feels less safe.

The Chief Minister’s Secretariat in Lucknow has now taken up the file. It forwarded the grievance to Shri Arvind Mohan, Joint Secretary. This high-level attention matters a great deal.

Concrete steps must follow, and quickly: (Grievance Against Police in Land Grabbing)

• Order an independent, high-level inquiry. The state should probe more than the land dispute. It must also examine the conduct of S.I. Shriram Singh and the CO Lalganj. Likewise, it must examine the Lekhpal and the Revenue Inspector named in the complaint.
• Act against the land mafia. Authorities must move decisively against Rama Shankar Patel and his associates. They should also investigate the wider pattern of land grabbing in the Lalganj area. One question needs an answer: why do police not touch the land mafia? Only strict enforcement can answer it.
• Restore portal integrity. The state government must build rigorous checks into its grievance system. Otherwise, corrupt officials will keep filing arbitrary and misleading reports on Jansunwai to bury genuine complaints. In every case, transparency must be mandatory.

The appeal itself is simple. The complainant asks the state to take “her steps against the land Mafia mushrooming in the area otherwise condition will be terrific.” Three things now hang in the balance: the safety of older citizens, the sanctity of ancestral homes and the integrity of public service. Mirzapur therefore needs urgent intervention to protect its residents and to restore honest administration.

---

Would you like me to find the full text of Sections 126 and 135 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) mentioned in the police report?