DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur has become the central concern of a grievance now under review by the Uttar Pradesh administration. According to the complaint, large-scale and illegal felling of green trees — including the protected Sal/Sakhua (Shorea robusta) species — has taken place in the Baki Range of the Gorakhpur Division, an area that borders Nepal and is officially classified as a “super sensitive zone.” Consequently, what might otherwise be treated as a routine forestry lapse instead points to a deeper administrative failure: for four years, a Deputy Ranger has held only ad-hoc charge of the range, raising the question of whether inadequate oversight by the Divisional Forest Officer allowed the felling to continue unchecked.

DFO Overlooking Tree Felling in Gorakhpur: A Grave Environmental Concern

DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur is at the heart of a troubling grievance now before the Uttar Pradesh administration. Specifically, the complaint alleges that large-scale and illegal felling of green trees — including the protected Sal/Sakhua (Shorea robusta) species — has taken place in the Baki Range of the Gorakhpur Division. Because this range borders Nepal and is officially classified as a “super sensitive area,” the reported damage, as a result, carries consequences that extend well beyond a single forest beat.

Moreover, the grievance suggests that this isn’t simply a case of unauthorised logging. Instead, it points to a deeper administrative failure: a Deputy Ranger has held ad-hoc charge of the Baki Range for four years, and, as a result, serious questions now surround whether inadequate supervision by the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) allowed the felling to continue unchecked.

---

1. Why DFO Overlooking Tree Felling in Gorakhpur Matters Ecologically

To begin with, illegal tree felling in a sensitive forest zone rarely stays contained to the trees themselves. Instead, it sets off a chain reaction of ecological harm. As a result of the reported felling in the Daulatpur beat of Baki Range, therefore, the following impacts have been flagged:

Environmental Impact	Description of Effect
Loss of Biodiversity	Since forests are, first of all, vital habitats, felling mature Sal trees leads to habitat destruction and fragmentation, thereby endangering countless species that depend on them for food, shelter, and breeding.
Increased Soil Erosion	Because tree roots stabilise soil, their removal, in turn, exposes the forest floor to rain and wind. Consequently, this triggers erosion, reduces fertility, and, ultimately, increases sedimentation in nearby rivers.
Impact on Water Cycle	Forests play a critical role in regulating the local water cycle; therefore, their loss can disrupt rainfall patterns and groundwater recharge, thus leading to both flooding and water scarcity.
Climate Change Contribution	Given that trees act as carbon sinks, illegal logging, in effect, releases stored carbon back into the atmosphere, thus accelerating climate change.
Microclimate Alteration	Once canopy cover is lost, ground temperatures rise and humidity drops accordingly. In turn, this stresses remaining vegetation and wildlife, making the area, consequently, more prone to drought and fire.
Ecosystem Fragmentation	Because logging isolates animal populations, genetic diversity declines, and, as a result, migration patterns are disrupted — ultimately increasing the risk of local extinction.

Clearly, then, the ecological stakes are high, and, as such, they underscore why the question of a DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur cannot be treated as a minor administrative footnote.

---

2. The Legal and Accountability Angle

Beyond the environmental damage, the grievance also raises pointed questions about enforcement and administrative accountability. In particular, two issues stand out:

• Violation of the U.P. Protection of Trees Act, 1976: First, the complaint explicitly mentions that the illegal felling of green trees warrants an FIR under this Act, which regulates tree felling and replanting. However, its penalties under the original Act — up to six months’ imprisonment or a fine of ₹10,000 — are widely seen as lenient, which is precisely why stricter enforcement is, therefore, being demanded.
• Prolonged Ad-Hoc Posting: Second, and just as importantly, at the centre of the accountability debate is Deputy Ranger Jagdamba Pathak, who has served as in-charge Ranger for the super sensitive Baki Range for four years. While the DFO has defended this arrangement as a government-level staffing decision, the complainant, nonetheless, argues that the absence of a full-rank Ranger reflects a lapse in supervision — one that, arguably, may have created the conditions for the felling to go unnoticed, or worse, unchallenged.

In other words, then, the debate over DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur is inseparable from the broader question of who is actually watching the forest.

---

3. What the RTI Grievance Demands

Using Section 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act, 2005, complainant Yogi M. P. Singh has, accordingly, used the RTI framework to demand specific administrative information, so as to ensure transparency and accountability:

1. First, a list of un-posted Rangers and their current posting details.
2. Second, the reason for the long-term charge given to Deputy Ranger Jagdamba Pathak, citing the Right to Reason as an indispensable part of a sound administrative system.
3. Third, the name and designation of public personnel supervising Ranger postings at the government level.
4. Finally, the demand letter made by the local office to fill the Ranger vacancy in the Baki range, which has, notably, been vacant for four years.

Taken together, then, these demands aim to establish, once and for all, whether the DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur was a matter of negligence, resourcing failure, or something that, indeed, warrants further scrutiny.

---

The illegal felling of trees in the Baki Range, therefore, clearly illustrates how administrative lapses can directly facilitate severe environmental damage, thus underscoring the immediate need for a comprehensive investigation, the registration of FIRs against offenders, and the swift resolution of the prolonged vacancy in the Ranger post.

Consequently, stopping illegal tree felling and addressing administrative issues like the one in the Baki Range requires utilising the official grievance redressal and departmental contact channels for the Government of Uttar Pradesh and the Forest Department.

4. How to Report Similar Concerns (DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur)

Fortunately, several official channels exist for citizens who want to escalate similar environmental or administrative concerns in Uttar Pradesh. Notably, the original complaint you provided was filed through this same portal.

A. Jansunwai Grievance Portal (DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur)

Detail	Contact/Link	Purpose
Portal Link	https://jansunwai.up.nic.in/	Lodge and track a new grievance
Email	jansunwai-up[at]gov[dot]in	Specifically for queries about the portal itself
Action Taken Officer	Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary), CM Secretariat	Accordingly handles forwarded grievances
Officer Contact	0522-2226350	For follow-up on high-level grievances

B. UP Forest Department — Gorakhpur Division

For issues directly related to illegal felling and forest officer accountability, in particular, contacting the Divisional and Principal Forest Officers is crucial. (DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur)

Designation	Contact	Note
DFO, Gorakhpur	0551-2333108	Specifically, the officer directly responsible for the Gorakhpur Division, including the Baki Range
DFO Email	dfogorakhpur@yahoo.co.in	Best used for formal correspondence
Regional Manager, UP Forest Corporation	0551-2500089 / rmgor@upfc.in	Additionally, the Forest Corporation also plays a role in forest management and logging

C. State-Level Authorities (Lucknow) (DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur)

Designation	Contact	Purpose
Principal Secretary, Forest	0522-2238669 / psecforest-up@nic.in	Serves as the highest administrative authority, essential for administrative issues like the Ranger posting
HOD (PCCF)	0522-2206168 / pccf-up@nic.in	Functions as the primary field authority
General Helpline	1926 (Toll-Free)	Available for general queries

D. Other Relevant Websites (DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur)

Website Link	Purpose
http://upforest.org/	Namely, the Official website of the Forest Department, Uttar Pradesh
https://upforestcorporation.co.in/	Similarly, the official website of the UP Forest Corporation, including divisional office details for Gorakhpur

---

Recommended Action Plan

Given the scale of the issue, therefore, a multi-pronged approach is advisable:

1. File a fresh Jansunwai grievance: To start, file a new complaint on the Jansunwai Portal focused purely on the illegal felling of green trees (Sal/Sakhua) in Daulatpur beat of Baki Range, thereby demanding an on-site joint investigation and an FIR under the U.P. Protection of Trees Act, 1976.
2. Send a direct email: Next, write to the DFO, Gorakhpur (dfogorakhpur@yahoo.co.in), with a copy to the Principal Secretary, Forest (psecforest-up@nic.in), detailing both the felling incident and the administrative issue of the prolonged Deputy Ranger charge.
3. File an RTI (if needed): Finally, use the RTI application process to demand the specific information requested above. Indeed, the original grievance mentioned a pending RTI, which remains the correct way to force disclosure on administrative reasons and official files.

DFO Must not Overlook as concerning with ecology

Ultimately, then, the case of a DFO overlooking tree felling in Gorakhpur illustrates how administrative gaps can quietly enable environmental harm. Consequently, sustained public pressure — through grievance portals, RTI applications, and direct correspondence — remains the most practical way to demand accountability and, in the end, protect what remains of the Baki Range. grievance portals, RTI applications, and direct correspondence — remains the most practical way to demand accountability and protect what remains of the Baki Range.ing and administrative concern?