🚨 Arbitrary Policing and The Fight for Justice: A Woman’s Grievance Against UP Police 🚨

Mohima Maurya was present at the Vindhyachal police station on a day that would forever change her life, but despite her urgent pleas and the details of her ordeal, her first information report was not registered under her signature, leaving her feeling powerless and unheard.
Her husband, Pramod Kumar Kushwaha, was illegally detained by the Vindhyachal police under circumstances that were both distressing and unjust.
The police, instead of providing the support that Mohima desperately sought, took her representation on behalf of her husband, complicating the situation further.
She found herself navigating a bureaucratic maze filled with obstacles, as she attempted to advocate for his release and ensure that his rights were upheld amidst a system that seemed indifferent to their plight.
Mohima’s determination to fight for her husband’s freedom only grew stronger as she faced the daunting challenges ahead, hoping that justice would eventually prevail.

---

Shocking Allegations: Police Harassment Over Official Grievance

A serious grievance filed on the Jansunwai portal (Registration No. GOVUP/E/2024/0082409) by Mahima Maurya from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, has brought forth troubling allegations against the local police, raising significant concerns about the accountability and responsiveness of law enforcement in the region.
This situation was echoed by the woman’s grievance against police handling, which highlights a broader pattern of disregard for citizen complaints. The complainant states that instead of redressing her original grievance, police personnel are making “irritating phone calls,” which adds an additional layer of stress and frustration to an already difficult situation.
These communications not only distract from the gravity of her complaints but further indicate an alarming lack of professionalism. They are also “pressurising the applicant not to submit the representation on the portal for justice,” an act that undermines the very essence of the grievance redressal system, leaving Mahima feeling vulnerable and unsupported in her attempts to seek justice for the injustices she has faced.
This report raises critical questions about the effectiveness of the mechanisms designed to protect citizens and ensure that their voices are heard with the respect and seriousness they deserve.

This reflects a profound breakdown in the grievance redressal mechanism. It suggests “arbitrariness and tyranny of the police” towards an applicant, a woman belonging to a vulnerable section. The applicant claims to have an entire tapped conversation with the police to substantiate her claims of coercion.

---

The Evidence: Discrepancies in the Crime Record and Medical Report

The core of the matter revolves around the police’s handling of the initial crime report and the medical evidence, which has raised significant concerns regarding the procedural integrity of law enforcement.
This situation reflects a serious grievance lodged by a woman against police actions, highlighting not only the potential mishandling of her case but also the broader implications for victims of crime who may feel marginalized or unsupported by the very systems meant to protect them.
The inadequacies in processing her report and analyzing the medical evidence underscore a pressing need for accountability and reform within the police department, as these lapses can discourage others from coming forward to report similar incidents.
Such a scenario raises critical questions about the training and resources available to officers tasked with investigating sensitive cases, ultimately impacting the trust that the community has in its law enforcement agencies.

• Medical Report vs. Police Action: An attached medical examination report from the Community Health Centre, Vindhyachal (dated 14/09/2024), clearly details four injuries on the applicant’s body.
  • One injury on the head, below the right pupil of the eye, measuring $3 \text{ cm} \times 0.3 \text{ cm} \times 0.5 \text{ cm}$.
  • Another injury was reported on the left hand between the thumb and index finger. This later resulted in a broken thumb bone confirmed during subsequent treatment in Prayagraj.
• The ‘Simple’ Opinion: Despite the nature of the injuries, including one near the eye and a broken bone, the medical officer’s opinion was that all injuries were “simple in nature.”
• Missing Victim Description in Police Documents: The applicant highlights a critical flaw in the official record: pages 4, 5, and 6 of the attached PDF lack description of the applicant (the victim). Instead, they appear to describe others who were not the victim of the crime. This suggests the police are treating the wrong individuals as the primary subjects while ignoring the woman’s grievance.

---

Questioning the System: Contradiction to CM’s Assurances

The applicant directly challenges the state’s system’s efficacy and integrity, highlighting troubling discrepancies that suggest a deeper issue at play.
This is particularly concerning because the Chief Minister has repeatedly assured the public that authorities are diligently addressing grievances, such as those from a woman who bravely came forward against police wrongdoings.
Despite these assurances, the applicant raises valid questions about whether the mechanisms in place are truly capable of dealing with such complaints effectively, or if they merely serve as a facade for an outdated system that fails to protect the vulnerable.
The implications of these inadequacies are alarming, as they not only erode public trust in government institutions but also foster an environment where citizens may feel discouraged from speaking out against injustices, thereby impeding progress toward a more accountable and fair society.

“Our chief minister says that in his regime first information reports of the victims are registered in the police stations in the state of Uttar Pradesh totally differ from the factual positions of the police stations. This case is an example of the contrary statement…”

The grievance underscores that despite numerous representations submitted, and a committee headed by the Chief Minister monitoring the portal, the core issue of police misconduct persists. There is a reluctance to register a genuine First Information Report (FIR) for the victim.

---

Call to Action: Seeking a ‘Cogent and Logistic Approach’

The applicant, Mahima Maurya, has appealed to the authorities with a sense of urgency and determination.
She specifically forwarded the complaint to Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) in the Chief Minister Secretariat, Lucknow, urging for prompt and decisive action regarding her concerns.
In her communication, she outlined the various issues she has been facing, emphasizing the impact of these challenges not only on her personal circumstances but also on the broader community.
Mahima expressed her hope that the authorities would give her appeal the serious consideration it deserves, as it pertains to matters that deeply affect the welfare of many, and encouraged a swift resolution to foster positive change.

• Justice for a Vulnerable Woman: There is a demand for the police to adopt a “cogent and logistic approach” to move ahead in providing justice. This reflects the woman’s grievance against police methods.
• Investigation of Arbitrariness: A clear request is made to take a “glance of the attached PDF document”. It is necessary to address the coercive tactics and manipulation of official documents by the concerned police staff.

This case serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges faced by ordinary citizens. These arise when the very machinery meant to deliver justice allegedly turns into a tool of pressure and arbitrary authority.

Would you like to search for the outcome or further updates regarding this specific grievance registration number (GOVUP/E/2024/0082409)?

Mirzapur police is not registering FIR of Mahima Maurya is reflection of justice