The key takeaway from the blog post is that :

The case of Araji Number 164 bifurcated is a prime example of how the Right to Information (RTI) Act serves as a surgical tool. It allows citizens to audit complex land administration. They can also hold local authorities accountable.

Through the lens of the Araji Number 164 K, Araji Number 164 Kh (earlier only Araji No. 164) case in Mirzapur, the post illustrates three critical functions of an effective RTI:

1. Verification of “Paper Trails” (Araji Number 164 bifurcated)

This demonstrates how a citizen can reconstruct a property’s history by demanding certified copies of revenue records spanning decades. Consequently, this action prevents the “erasing” of historical ownership or land classifications. This erasing might occur due to administrative errors or, moreover, intentional manipulation.

2. Identifying Administrative Accountability (Araji Number 164 bifurcated)

By asking for the specific names and designations of officials (like the Lekhpal and Tehsildar) involved in the bifurcation of land, the RTI transforms anonymous bureaucratic decisions into individual accountability. Consequently, it forces these officials to stand by the legality of their previous reports.

3. Protecting Public Assets

The most vital takeaway, therefore, is the use of RTI to prevent the illegal privatization of government land. By requesting the legal “basis” for land transfers and sale deeds, including those for Araji Number 164 bifurcated, to private individuals, the application establishes a necessary check against the unauthorized sale of non-agriculture government property.

Araji Number 164 bifurcated: Navigating Revenue Records with RTI in Mirzapur

The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 stands as a beacon for transparency and accountability in India. For example, for citizens grappling with land disputes, seeking historical records, or verifying the legal status of property, RTI can be an invaluable tool. This blog post delves into a specific case involving Araji Number 164 bifurcated in Village Bihasara Khurd, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur. Specifically, it highlights how an RTI application was strategically used to unravel complex land ownership and administrative changes. Therefore, we’ll explore the critical information sought and the potential implications of each query.

The Power of Information: A Citizen’s Quest for Clarity(Araji Number 164 bifurcated)

Land, especially agricultural land, often carries a legacy of complex ownership changes, administrative interventions, and sometimes, murky dealings. Therefore, when records become convoluted, or suspicions arise regarding the legality of transactions, the RTI Act empowers ordinary citizens to demand answers from public authorities.

In this particular case, the applicant, Ashok Kumar Maurya, filed a detailed RTI application with the District Magistrate Office, Mirzapur. Specifically, he aimed to shed light on Araji Number 164 bifurcated. The application, identified by Registration Number DMOMR/R/2026/60025, meticulously outlined eight crucial points of information.

Deconstructing the RTI Application: 8 Pillars of Inquiry

Let’s break down each point of information sought, understanding its significance in piecing together the complete picture of Araji Number 164.

1. Certified Revenue Records (2000-2025) for Araji Number 164

The first and most fundamental request is for a certified copy of the revenue records for Araji Number 164 from 2000 to 2025.

• Significance: This is the bedrock of the inquiry. Revenue records (like the Khatauni, Khasra, and Fard) provide a historical snapshot of ownership, cultivation, and land classification. Therefore, a certified copy ensures authenticity and can be used as legal evidence. Moreover, the 25-year timeframe is critical for tracking long-term changes and identifying the land’s initial status. This information will thus reveal the chronological progression of who owned or occupied the land, as well as if there were any changes in its use or classification over this period. Araji Number 164 bifurcated.

2. Administrative Orders for Araji Number Transitions (175 → 183 → 191 → 164)

This query seeks certified copies of administrative orders or proceedings that explain the sequence of changes: Araji Number 175 being modified to 183, then to 191, and finally to 164.

• Significance: Land numbers generally remain stable unless there’s a specific administrative reason for change, such as re-survey, consolidation (chakbandi), or bifurcation/amalgamation. Araji Number 164 bifurcated Such frequent and sequential changes are unusual and raise red flags. The administrative orders will clarify the legal basis and the procedural adherence for each modification, potentially revealing errors or intentional manipulations if they exist. This is crucial for establishing a clear chain of title and understanding the evolution of the land parcel.

3. Order Authorizing Bifurcation of Araji Number 164 (into 164 K and 164 Kh)

The applicant has requested a certified copy of the order or file notings that authorized the bifurcation of Araji Number 164 into sub-parcels 164 K and 164 Kh.

Significance of the Bifurcation Order and File Notings

The splitting of a land parcel (bifurcation) is a frequent administrative action, but it requires strict adherence to legal protocol. It must be executed through the appropriate administrative authority, typically the Tehsildar or SDM, in compliance with established rules and regulations.

The official order is critical as it formally specifies:

1. The justification for the bifurcation.
2. The demarcation of the new boundaries.
3. The legal recognition of the resulting, distinct parcels.

Equally important are the “file notings.” These notings provide a transparent record of the internal decision-making process, including the recommendations and approvals from various officials. This documentation is essential for legally establishing the existence and distinct identities of the new parcels, such as 164 K and 164 Kh.

4. Details of Revenue Staff Responsible for Verifying Non-Agriculture Government Land Status

This point asks for the names and designations of the revenue staff (Lekhpal and Tehsildar) responsible for verifying Araji Number 164 as “non-agriculture government land” at the time of its bifurcation.

• Significance: This query targets accountability. If Araji Number 164 bifurcated was indeed government land and subsequently bifurcated, the officials involved in classifying and verifying its status bear significant responsibility. Their names and designations link specific individuals to the actions taken, which is vital if any irregularities are found later. Lekhpals are the ground-level revenue officials, and Tehsildars are supervisory authorities; their roles in such a verification process are paramount. This helps pinpoint who made the critical declarations about the land’s nature.

5. Information on Sale Deeds for 164 K or 164 Kh to Private Individuals

This is a critical query: were any sale deeds executed for Araji Number 164 K / 164 Kh to private individuals? If so, the applicant wants the names of the purchasers and the basis on which government land was transferred to private parties.

• Significance: This point directly addresses the potential illegal transfer of public land, including Araji Number 164 bifurcated. Generally, government land cannot be sold to private individuals without specific, legally defined procedures (e.g., auctions or government schemes). Therefore, if such sales occurred, especially if the land was initially classified as “non-agriculture government land,” it could point to significant irregularities or even fraud. Consequently, this information is crucial for uncovering potential corruption and challenging illegal land transactions. The “basis” of transfer is particularly important here, because it tests the legality of any such transaction.

6. Inquiry Report/Action Taken Report on Grievance Numbers GOVUP/E/2025/0051450 and GOVUP/E/2025/0021969

The applicant has sought copies of the inquiry report or action taken report for two specific grievance registration numbers submitted through the Jansunwai portal.

• Significance: Jansunwai (public hearing) portals are designed for citizens to register grievances. Therefore, the fact that the applicant (or someone else) filed grievances implies existing concerns about this land. Furthermore, the inquiry reports will reveal what investigations were conducted, what findings were made, and what actions, if any, were taken by the authorities in response to these complaints. This provides insight into whether the administration was aware of issues concerning Araji Number 164. Consequently, it helps to understand the administration’s historical engagement with the problem and how they addressed it.

7. Suo Moto Action by DM/SDM under Section 38 of UP Revenue Code 2006

This query asks whether the District Magistrate (DM) or Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) has initiated any Suo Moto (on their own motion) action under Section 38 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006, for the correction of records regarding this land.

• Significance: Section 38 of the UP Revenue Code empowers revenue officers to correct errors in revenue records on their own motion, even without an application from a party, if they detect a mistake. Asking about Suo Moto action indicates a deeper probe into administrative oversight and responsiveness. If irregularities are suspected, the DM/SDM has the power to intervene to ensure record accuracy. A lack of Suo Moto action, despite grievances, could indicate administrative inaction or a failure to address obvious errors. This is particularly relevant for complex land issues, such as those involving Araji Number 164 bifurcated, where clear administrative intervention may be required.

8. Certified Copy of the “Parrot Report” Submitted by the Lekhpal

Finally, the applicant has requested a certified copy of the “parrot report” submitted by the Lekhpal in response to the aforementioned grievances.

• Significance: The term “parrot report” likely refers to a specific type of field verification report. It may be one that simply echoes previous findings without fresh investigation, or a report expected to be comprehensive and detailed. Lekhpals are crucial for ground-level verification. Consequently, this report would contain their on-the-spot findings and recommendations regarding the land (including Araji Number 164 bifurcated). Thus, it directly addresses the concerns raised in the grievances. Its content is vital for understanding the official ground reality assessment, and a “certified copy” ensures its authenticity.

Conclusion: A Blueprint for Transparency

This detailed RTI application concerning Araji Number 164 is a testament to the power of informed citizenship. By meticulously requesting specific documents and actions, Ashok Kumar Maurya has created a comprehensive blueprint for uncovering the truth behind land records and administrative decisions in Mirzapur. The answers to these eight points will not only clarify the history and status of this particular land parcel but could also highlight systemic issues or procedural lapses within the revenue department, ultimately reinforcing the principles of transparency and justice that the RTI Act champions. The upcoming 30 days will be crucial as the designated PIO, Vishal Kumar Sharma, Tehsildar, prepares to provide the requested information. The outcome of this application holds significant implications for land governance in the region.

To help you maintain a professional and persistent follow-up on your RTI, here are the official contact details for the public authorities involved in your case.

1. Key Application Reference

• Registration Number: DMOMR/R/2026/60025
• Date of Filing: 20-01-2026
• Status: Success (Payment Received)

---

2. Primary Public Authorities (Mirzapur)

Office / Role	Name of Officer	Mobile / Phone	Email ID
District Magistrate (DM)	Shri Pawan Kumar Gangwar (IAS)	9454417567	dmmir@nic.in
Public Information Officer (PIO)	Vishal Kumar Sharma (Tehsildar)	9454416823	teh-sadar.mi@up.gov.in
Nodal Officer (RTI)	Ajay Kumar Singh	8756844195	shakti.3916@up.gov.in
First Appellate Authority (FAA)	Asha Ram Verma (SDM Sadar)	9454416810	sdm-sadar.mi@up.gov.in

---

3. Web & Portal Resources

• Official District Website:mirzapur.nic.in
• – *Consequently, use this to check “Who’s Who” or look for Public Notices related to revenue.*
  • UP RTI Online Portal:rtionline.up.gov.in
    • Therefore, use this to track your specific application. Alternatively, you canfile a First Appeal if you don’t get a response by Feb 19, 2026.
  • UP Bhulekh (Land Records):upbhulekh.gov.in
    • Notably, you can search for the current ‘Khatauni’ (Record of Rights) for Araji 164 K and 164 Kh here.
  • Jansunwai (IGRS) Portal:jansunwai.up.nic.in
    • Since you mentioned grievance numbers (e.g., GOVUP/E/2025/0051450), you can check the status of those specific complaints here.

---

4. Important Tips for Communication

• Emailing:Therefore, when sending an email to the DM or Tehsildar, always mention your Registration Number (DMOMR/R/2026/60025) and Araji Number 164 bifurcated in the subject line.
  • Calling: Furthermore, if you call the PIO (Tehsildar), do so during office hours (10:00 AM to 5:00 PM). Specifically, ask for the “RTI Clerk” or “Reader” to get the latest status of your file.

Would you like me to draft a professional email template you can send to the Nodal Officer to ensure your application is being processed?