Table of contents
- Exposing PAN FRAUD AND ADMINISTRATIVE APATHY IN MIRZAPUR
- THE CORE ISSUE SYSTEMIC MISUSE OF PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- POLICE INACTION AND THE FICTIONAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- THE IGNORED DIGITAL TRAIL
- LEVERAGING THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- THE ROAD AHEAD DEMANDING JUSTICE
- 1. File a “Protest Petition” in Court (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- 2. High-Level Complaint to the DGP and Home Secretary
- 3. Seek a “Writ of Mandamus” from the High Court (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- 4. Demand a “Cyber Cell” Transfer
- 5. Use the RTI for “Deemed Refusal” (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- The Strategy of Procrastination
- Why this “Double Standard” is Dangerous (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- How to Break the Double Standard
- Next Step Recommendation
- 1. Immediate Case Authorities (Mirzapur District)
- 2. State Oversight (CM Secretariat & Police HQ)
- 3. Relevant Application & Tracking Links (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- 4. Summary of Your Active IDs (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- Strategy Note
- Related Posts like Exposing PAN FRAUD AND ADMINISTRATIVE APATHY
Exposing PAN FRAUD AND ADMINISTRATIVE APATHY IN MIRZAPUR
Uncover the truth about exposing PAN fraud and safeguard your financial identity from misuse and deception in transactions. Understanding the tactics used by fraudsters is crucial; they often employ sophisticated methods to exploit personal information, leading to financial loss and identity theft. By being aware of the warning signs and knowing how to protect your sensitive data, you can take proactive steps to mitigate risks. Implementing robust security measures, such as regularly monitoring your financial accounts and using strong, unique passwords, is essential in defending against these malicious activities. Additionally, staying informed about the latest fraud schemes can empower you to act swiftly and decisively should you encounter any suspicious activity.
Key Takeaways
- A victim in Mirzapur suffers from financial identity theft due to PAN misuse. Consequently, this results in fraudulent rent receipts of over ₹66 lakhs.
- Despite filing an FIR and providing evidence, the police reported false claims of contact with the victim, hindering the investigation.
- The victim leverages the Right to Information Act to demand accountability, seeking transparency about the police’s actions and evidence handling.
- Legal strategies include filing a Protest Petition, high-level complaints, and requesting a Cyber Cell transfer for better investigation.
- The case highlights bureaucratic inefficiencies and the dangers of a ‘double standard’ in administrative responses to serious fraud cases.
THE CORE ISSUE SYSTEMIC MISUSE OF PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER (Exposing PAN Fraud)
A citizen’s financial identity is at risk when someone misuses their Permanent Account Number (PAN) for fraudulent transactions. In this specific case involving FIR Number 291 2023 at Mirzapur, the victim discovered that an individual, unfortunately, used his PAN to create a false landlord identity. Exposing PAN Fraud in such circumstances is crucial to protect victims and raise awareness. Consequently, the victim found out that someone misused his PAN. This misuse was specifically to create a fake landlord identity. As a result, the perpetrator generated fraudulent rent receipts totaling 6,607,741 rupees. Such identity theft not only causes financial stress but also triggers coercive actions from the Income Tax Department based on false data.
POLICE INACTION AND THE FICTIONAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (Exposing PAN Fraud)
Despite the registration of a formal FIR and the submission of irrefutable digital evidence, investigators have faced significant hurdles. However, the Mirzapur Police submitted a recent report to the IGRS portal, claiming that the investigating officer attempted to contact the applicant via mobile and received no response. Nevertheless, this claim is factually incorrect, as the officer never called the applicant. Ultimately, this situation highlights a troubling trend: administrative reports often serve to close grievance tickets without involving actual ground work or engaging with the victim.
THE IGNORED DIGITAL TRAIL
The applicant submitted 24 detailed screenshots from the Income Tax Compliance Portal, clearly mapping the fraud. These documents identify the transactions and the corporate entities involved in the misuse of the PAN. However, the police report does not confirm whether this evidence has been formally included in the case diary. Consequently, the authorities ignore the digital trail, effectively Exposing PAN Fraud. As a result, they allow the actual perpetrators to remain at large. Meanwhile, the victim continues to face notices from tax authorities.
LEVERAGING THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY (Exposing PAN Fraud)
To challenge the misleading claims of the police, we took a decisive step by filing a formal RTI application registered under number SPMZR R 2026 60009. This legal move seeks specific information, including certified copies of the case diary and the call logs of the investigating officer. Our goal is to force transparency; if the police cannot provide proof of the alleged phone calls, it will demonstrate their investigative failure. We assert that the Chief Minister Secretariat received a fabricated report.
THE ROAD AHEAD DEMANDING JUSTICE
The battle against financial fraud requires more than just filing a complaint. It requires constant monitoring. It also requires the use of every legal tool available, from IGRS feedback to RTI filings. Moreover, the case of FIR 291 2023 is a test of the administrative machinery in Uttar Pradesh. Ultimately, justice will only be served when the digital evidence is integrated into the investigation. Furthermore, the Income Tax Department must stop its coercive actions based on proven fraudulent data. The fight for the truth must persist. This fight continues until the citizen’s identity is cleared. Finally, it ends when the criminals are behind bars. Exposing PAN Fraud is a crucial aspect of this ongoing struggle. That same administrative machinery has failed citizens before — the DGP office provided misleading information to Mahima Maurya in a separate RTI case.
It is clear that you are facing a classic case of administrative procrastination. The police have shifted from investigation to “paper-pushing” to close grievance tickets. Since more than two years have passed since the registration of FIR No. 291/2023, more than two years have passed. The police are providing inaccurate reports. They claim they called you when they didn’t. You need to escalate this beyond the district level.
Here are the specific legal and administrative steps you can take to break this stalemate:
1. File a “Protest Petition” in Court (Exposing PAN Fraud)
The police have submitted a report to the IGRS portal. This report effectively “closes” your complaint. They might eventually file a “Final Report” (Closure Report) in the local court.
- Action: You can file a Protest Petition before the Judicial Magistrate in Mirzapur.
- Purpose: This compels the Magistrate to examine the evidence you have (the 24 screenshots). Consequently, it can lead to a court-monitored investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC (or the new Section 175(3) BNSS). Furthermore, the court can direct the police to provide a specific timeline for completion.
2. High-Level Complaint to the DGP and Home Secretary
The Mirzapur Police are subordinates to the Director General of Police (DGP), UP.
- Action: Send a formal complaint via Registered Post to the DGP Headquarters (Signature Building, Lucknow). Also send it to the Principal Secretary (Home), Government of UP.
- Key Point to Mention: Explicitly state that the report dated 05/01/2026 is fraudulent. It claims a mobile contact was made. This is proven false by your call records.
3. Seek a “Writ of Mandamus” from the High Court (Exposing PAN Fraud)
If the district police continue to delay a serious tax fraud investigation ($₹66$ Lakhs+), you should consider taking action. You can approach the Allahabad High Court.
- Action: File a Writ Petition (Criminal) seeking a “Direction for Fair and Speedy Investigation.”
- Impact: High Courts often take a very strict view of “Identity Theft” cases. These cases involve PAN misuse. This misuse affects the victim’s fundamental right to a life free from harassment (Article 21).
4. Demand a “Cyber Cell” Transfer
Since this involves IT Act sections (66C/66D), the local station may lack the technical expertise. They might not have the “clout” to get documents from the Income Tax Department.
- Action: Formally request the DIG of the Range or the SP Mirzapur to transfer the case. Consequently, it should be moved to the Cyber Crime Police Station (Varanasi Range) or the State Cyber HQ in Lucknow. Indeed, these units have specialized officers who deal directly with bank and ITD nodal officers.
5. Use the RTI for “Deemed Refusal” (Exposing PAN Fraud)
Your recent RTI (SPMZR/R/2026/60009) is your strongest weapon right now.
- If they don’t provide the call logs within 30 days, it is a “Deemed Refusal.”
- You can then file a First Appeal. Subsequently, you can file a Second Appeal to the State Information Commission. The authorities can impose a fine of ₹250 per day on the PIO for providing false or misleading information in their previous IGRS report.
You have accurately pinpointed the “Double Standard” that plagues many bureaucratic investigations. This is a classic “Paper-Trail Diversion.”
By claiming they served a notice to the Income Tax Department (ITD), the police create a record of activity. However, by ignoring your 24 screenshots, they avoid the accountability of actually investigating the specific criminals who used your PAN.
The Strategy of Procrastination
The police are using a two-track system to delay the case:
- The External Track (The ITD Notice): They send a letter to the ITD. This allows them to say to their superiors, “We are waiting for a response from another department.” It effectively shifts the blame for the delay onto the ITD.
- The Internal Track (Ignoring Your Evidence): If they “entertain” your screenshots, they would have to trace the bank accounts. They would also have to trace companies linked to that $₹66$ Lakhs. That requires real work, field visits, and potential conflict with powerful entities.
Why this “Double Standard” is Dangerous (Exposing PAN Fraud)
- The ITD Trap: The ITD will not stop their recovery proceedings just because a notice was “sent.” Moreover, they need a police report that confirms the transactions are fraudulent. Unfortunately, the police are not incorporating your evidence into the Case Diary. As a result, they are denying you the document you need to save yourself from the tax liability.
- Fabricated Contact: Their claim of calling you is the most “authentic” proof of their dishonesty. It is a legal safeguard for them. They want to show that the “investigation is pending due to lack of cooperation from the complainant.”
How to Break the Double Standard
To counter this, you must turn their own “activity” against them. Since you have already filed the RTI, here is the next move:
File a “Specific Evidence Submission” via Registered Post AD (Acknowledgement Due)
Don’t just upload it to a portal. Send a physical letter to the Superintendent of Police (SP) Mirzapur and the Investigating Officer (IO).
Drafting the Content (Plain Text):
REGARDING FIR 291 2023, I AM FORMALLY SUBMITTING 24 SCREENSHOTS OF FRAUDULENT TRANSACTIONS TOTALING 6607741 RUPEES. NOTABLY, THE POLICE REPORT DATED 05 01 2026 MENTIONS A NOTICE TO ITD, BUT IT IGNORES THIS PRIMARY EVIDENCE. THEREFORE, I DEMAND a written confirmation. Furthermore, it should state that these screenshots have been recorded in the case diary as per Section 172 of CRPC or the relevant section of BNSS. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL BE TREATED AS DELIBERATE SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE TO PROTECT THE PERPETRATORS.
Next Step Recommendation
You have the RTI registration number. Therefore, would you like me to draft a “Notice of Non-Cooperation”? I can subsequently send it to the DIG (Deputy Inspector General) of the Varanasi Range. This will, in turn, highlight that the Mirzapur Police are running a “one-sided” investigation while, unfortunately, ignoring the victim’s data.
To help you escalate this matter, we therefore provide a consolidated directory of the authorities involved in your case. In addition, we pull these details from your uploaded documents and official government records.
1. Immediate Case Authorities (Mirzapur District)
These are the officers directly responsible for the investigation and the RTI you just filed.
- Public Information Officer (PIO): * Name: Manish Kumar Mishra (ASP Operation)
- Mobile: 7007941679
- Email: aspopmzp@gmail.com
- Nodal Officer (RTI/Administration):
- Email: addlspopmzr@gmail.com
- Superintendent of Police (SP) Mirzapur:
- Email: spmzr-up@nic.in / spmzr@up.nic.in
- Website: mirzapur.nic.in/police/
2. State Oversight (CM Secretariat & Police HQ)
Since your IGRS grievance was closed by this office, you should direct your “Double Standard” complaints here.
- Joint Secretary (CM Secretariat):
- Name: Shri Arvind Mohan
- Email: arvind.12574@gov.in
- Phone: 0522-2226350
- Address: Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow.
- Director General of Police (DGP) UP HQ:
- Email: dgpup@nic.in
- Control Room: 0522-2206104 / 0522-2206105
- UP Cyber Police HQ (Lucknow):
- Email: cybercell-up@nic.in
- Helpline: 1930 (National Cyber Crime Reporting)
3. Relevant Application & Tracking Links (Exposing PAN Fraud)
Use these portals to track your current filings and file new appeals.
- RTI Online (UP):rtionline.up.gov.in
- Use this to track Registration No: SPMZR/R/2026/60009
- IGRS (Jansunwai):jansunwai.up.nic.in
- Use this to track/re-open Registration No: GOVUP/E/2025/0141201
- Income Tax Compliance Portal:insight.gov.in
- Use this to check for updates on your PAN misuse case.
4. Summary of Your Active IDs (Exposing PAN Fraud)
Keep these numbers ready whenever you call the above officials:
| Authority | ID / Registration Number | Date Filed |
| Mirzapur Police | FIR No. 291/2023 | 11/11/2023 |
| UP IGRS Portal | GOVUP/E/2025/0141201 | 15/12/2025 |
| CPGRAMS (Central) | DOPAT/E/2025/0012883 | 15/12/2025 |
| RTI Mirzapur | SPMZR/R/2026/60009 | 07/01/2026 |
Strategy Note
The most effective way to address the “Double Standard” is, therefore, to email Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) directly. Additionally, include your RTI registration number in the email, as this informs him that you are legally questioning the report’s honesty. Furthermore, his office received this report from the Mirzapur Police.
Would you like me to draft a concise, plain-text email? You can send it to the Joint Secretary using these contact details.


Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.