Introduction PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal

Misuse of PAN (Permanent Account Number) is a serious concern that can lead to identity theft and financial fraud. Therefore, it’s important to understand the process of PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal if you suspect your PAN is being used improperly. Specifically, individuals must remain vigilant regarding their PAN and report any suspicious activities associated with it. Moreover, if faced with misuse issues, filing a Right to Information (RTI) appeal can be a helpful way to seek clarification and resolution.

Key Takeaway: PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal — Closing the Accountability Gap

Significantly, this case highlights the widening divide between digital financial fraud and administrative accountability. When PAN misuse goes unchecked, authorities consequently leave innocent citizens to handle the resulting burdens.

Three Critical Systemic Failures

The RTI Act is designed to ensure transparency; however, upon examining the specifics of this case of PAN misuse and RTI appeal obstruction, three critical systemic failures emerge:

• First, the ‘Procedural Loop’: Local authorities often provide process-based answers—such as proof that a letter was sent—instead of outcome-based information, leaving the victim responsible for a ₹350 million fraudulent trail.
• Second, the PAN System Vulnerability: This case obviously reveals how shell companies can exploit a citizen’s PAN for tax evasion, consequently putting the burden of innocence on the victim.
• Third, Investigative Inertia: A 20-month delay in a high-value cyber-financial crime investigation not only reveals a serious lack of urgency but also underscores the evident shortcomings of local authorities, who clearly lack the technical capacity to track complex inter-state financial trails, such as the Mirzapur-to-Raipur connection. Moreover, when it comes to PAN misuse and RTI appeals, it is crucial to recognize that the disclosure of correspondence is not synonymous with the disclosure of progress. Therefore, without aggressive inter-departmental action, the RTI Act risks becoming a mere tool for observation rather than an effective vehicle for justice.

Many more Attempts to Achieve Goal

With this background established, the following analysis examines the case of Yogi M P Singh vs the Mirzapur Police, highlighting the systemic challenges of addressing high-value PAN identity theft and the procedural hurdles within the RTI framework.e & RTI Appeal: Identity Theft, Institutional Inertia, and the ₹350 Million Fraud Case

The RTI Act is intended to expose bureaucratic opacity; however, ironically, for Yogi M P Singh of Mirzapur, procedural delays and incomplete disclosures continue to obstruct justice in his RTI appeal seeking action on his PAN misuse case (SPMZR/A/2025/60026). Moreover, the case uncovers financial identity theft by 200 companies, totalling ₹3,50,00,000 (35 Crores).

The Core Conflict: PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal and Identity Hijacking

Fundamentally, at the heart of this RTI appeal lies a large-scale case of PAN misuse. Specifically, Mr Singh alleges that approximately 200 firms fraudulently used his Permanent Account Number (PAN) to conduct business transactions and facilitate payments. As a result, the Income Tax Department attributes all those transactions to Mr Singh — creating a massive, fictitious tax liability and placing an innocent citizen at serious legal risk.

The primary motive behind such PAN misuse is typically tax evasion or money laundering. In practice, the use of a third party’s credentials to “layer” transactions complicates the situation significantly. Consequently, this development makes it extremely difficult for authorities to trace the actual beneficiaries; as a result, the PAN holder ultimately bears the consequences. This leads us to a chronology of an unresolved investigation.

Notably, the timeline of this case reveals a frustrating cycle of inquiry without outcome: PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal

1. To begin with, Mr Singh discovered the discrepancy through his Annual Information Statement (AIS—a summary of high-value financial transactions linked to a PAN) and Tax Information Summary (TIS—a compilation showing reported income and tax details) on the Income Tax portal.
2. Subsequently, an RTI was filed on May 11, 2025, seeking progress reports on the police investigation.
3. The Police Response: Initially, the Public Information Officer (PIO) provided a copy of a communication sent by Inspector Jitendra Kumar (Kotwali Police Station, Katra) to the Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). Subsequently, this communication outlined significant details regarding ongoing investigations and actions taken.
4. Finally, on June 21, 2025, Mr. Singh filed a First Appeal under the RTI Act, asserting that the police’s response was not only “misleading,” but also “incomplete.”

The appellant’s frustration is justified. After 20 months, the police offered only a letter of correspondence and no concrete evidence of action against the 200 defaulting firms.

The Five Pillars of Information Sought

In his appeal to the First Appellate Authority (FAA), Somen Verma (SSP Mirzapur), the appellant demands clarity on five specific points:

• Firstly, Action Against Fraudulent Firms: What specific legal steps have been taken against the 200 entities (businesses or organisations) listed in the tax documents?
• Secondly, Bank Account Transparency: The appellant asks the police to identify the bank accounts where the fraudsters deposited these payments.
• Third, Progress Report: The appellant requests a formal summary of the investigation’s status over the past two years.
• The “Raipur Address” Mystery: The user profile for the PAN (GSWPS080Q) shows a fraudulent address in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. This is concerning because the owner resides in Uttar Pradesh. Further investigation is needed to understand how this discrepancy occurred.
• Fifth, Inter-Departmental Coordination: This is evident from into smaller sentences:

Inter-Departmental Coordination and Legal Protections: PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal

Communications and Financial Discrepancy

• Copies of all communications exist between the Mirzapur Police and the Income Tax Department.
• These communications pertain to the ₹35 Crore discrepancy.
• A crore equals ten million rupees.
• Therefore, ₹35 Crore means ₹350,000,000.

Challenges in Multi-Agency Cooperation

These five information requests collectively reveal the deeper issue: how PAN misuse exposes weaknesses in both the RTI process and law enforcement systems. Importantly, the misuse of PAN highlights a critical weakness in how local law enforcement handles complex financial crimes. Indeed, a successful RTI appeal and subsequent investigation of this kind demands seamless coordination between:

1. The Local Police: To register the FIR and investigate the identity theft.
2. The Income Tax Department: To verify the source of the AIS/TIS data.
3. Third, The Banks: To freeze accounts and trace the ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) documents used by the fraud. Tellingly, the PIO merely provided a letter sent to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the government agency responsible for administering tax laws in India. This clearly suggests that local police are ‘passing the buck’ to central authorities and leaving the victim without answers. Legal Implications
   Having identified these coordination shortcomings, it is important to examine the legal implications: PAN Misuse and RTI Appeal Rights under the RTI Act 2005 are essential protections. Under Section 7(1)(c), citizens can appeal if they receive “incomplete, misleading, or false information.” In cases of PAN misuse, this provision is particularly critical. Specifically, Mr Singh’s appeal argues that sharing a copy of an outgoing letter does not constitute meaningful disclosure about the progress of an investigation.

Concerns Over Cyber-Fraud Investigation Delays

Additionally, the 20-month delay in a cyber-fraud case of this magnitude raises serious questions about the Mirzapur Police cyber cell’s efficiency. Indeed, in the digital age, financial footprints disappear quickly. Consequently, a two-year delay often means the money trail has gone cold. Conclusion: PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal — A Test for Accountability

RTI appeal. In closing, RTI appeal SPMZR/A/2025/60026 is more than a mere RTI appeal.  for protection against financial ruin. Evidently, this signals a systemic failure in both financial monitoring and criminal investigation. The Appellate Authority now faces a clear choice: uphold the transparency of the RTI Act by demanding a detailed investigation report on the PAN misuse, or alternatively, allow procedurally evasive responses to persist. Regardless, an innocent citizen stands to bear the full legal and financial consequences of a fraud he did not commit.

Here are the structured contact details i.e. Application IDs, Emails, Mobile Numbers and web link details

Having examined the legal framework, here are the structured contact details for the authorities involved in your RTI appeal, based on your filing details and the current administrative records for the Mirzapur district police. Authority Identification

1. Application IDs

• Application ID (RTI Request): SPMZR/R/2025/611
• Appeal ID (First Appeal): SPMZR/A/2025/60026
• Public Authority Name: Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur (UP Police).

---

2. Concerned Public Authorities Contact Details

First Appellate Authority (FAA)	Somen Verma	DIG/SSP Mirzapur	9454400299	spmzr-up@nic.in
Nodal Officer / PIO	Om Prakash Singh	ASP Operation	9125608556	addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Alternative PIO Contact	Manish Kumar Mishra	ASP Operation	9454401105	asp-op.mi@up.gov.in

---

3. Official Web Links

• RTI Online Portal (Uttar Pradesh):rtionline.up.gov.in
  • Use this to track your appeal status or file secondary appeals if necessary.
• Mirzapur District Official Directory: mirzapur.nic.in/whos-who
• UP Police Official Contact Page: uppolice.gov.in/contact-us
• Jansunwai (Integrated Grievance Redressal System):jansunwai.up.nic.in
  • Should the RTI process remain stagnant, file a complaint here. In many cases, this approach triggers a faster response from the SP’s office.

Important Note on Contact Info

Your filing mentions 9125608556 for the Nodal Officer. However, the official UP Police CUG (Closed User Group) number for the ASP Operation is 9454401105. If the mobile number in your records do, the official UP Police CUG (Closed User Group) number for the ASP Operation is 9454401105. If the mobile number in your records does not respond, use the CUG number. This is the direct official line that must be maintained by the officer in charge.

Related Posts like PAN Misuse & RTI Appeal

• Reporting Tax Fraud: A Case Study
• Understanding PAN Identity Theft: A Case Study
• RTI Inquiry on PAN Misuse in Mirzapur
• Tax Fraud and PAN Misuse: A Victim’s Journey
• Income Tax Grievance: Exploring Corruption Allegations