Table of contents
Introduction $35 Million PAN Misuse
The $35 Million tax fraud through the misuse of Yogi M P Singh’s PAN currently represents a major challenge for the U.P. Police. Specifically, the U. P. police registered a case of PAN misuse back in November 2023. However, there is still no major breakthrough in the matter. Furthermore, although I have provided a comprehensive list of 200 fraud companies to them, they are nevertheless not daring to investigate the $35 Million PAN misuse properly.
In detail, the provided text contains the specifics of two public grievances filed by Yogi M. P. Singh, who is a concerned citizen deeply invested in fiscal integrity. Specifically, these grievances concern a significant tax fraud and alleged non-cooperation/corruption by the Income Tax Department (ITD).
Furthermore, these grievances highlight serious lapses in oversight and accountability surrounding the massive $35 Million PAN misuse scam. Consequently, this troubling situation has drawn considerable public attention and outrage.
Ultimately, Mr. Singh’s efforts clearly reflect his personal commitment to justice. Additionally, they reflect the wider public demand for transparency in government operations, which is especially vital in matters of financial misconduct that undermine public trust.
Accordingly, here is a blog post summarizing the situation, including all the required details:
Key Takeaways
- The $35 Million PAN misuse involves serious tax fraud and ongoing legal challenges faced by complainant Yogi M.P. Singh.
- Despite compiling evidence of over 200 fraudulent companies, police have not made significant progress in the investigation.
- The Income Tax Department’s non-cooperation complicates the investigation, raising concerns about accountability and transparency.
- Public outrage has emerged over the apparent inaction regarding the $35 Million PAN misuse issue.
- Continuous efforts for reform and enforcement are necessary to restore public trust and address these systemic failures.
Unmasking the $35 Million PAN Misuse Scam: A Citizen’s Fight Against Corruption and Departmental Inaction
The Case of Yogi M. P. Singh and the Rs. 34 Crore Tax Fraud
Complainant: Mahesh Pratap Singh, nicknamed Yogi M. P. Singh, unfortunately had his PAN misused, making him a primary victim in a case that spiraled into a complex legal ordeal.
Fraud Amount: Specifically, it amounts to approximately Rs. 350 Million (Rs. 343,877,662), and this staggering sum underscores the overall severity of the situation.
In addition, the Misused PAN: GSWPS0850Q rightfully belongs to Mahesh Pratap Singh. However, it unlawfully became a tool for fraudulent activities, which inevitably led to unprecedented financial damage and distress.
Overall, the complexity of the $35 Million PAN misuse here is staggering. In fact, it involves intricate financial schemes. Moreover, it highlights systemic issues within regulatory frameworks that fail to protect individuals from exploitation. As a result, Yogi and many others are left grappling with the fallout of identity theft.
Grievance Details
Above all, this case highlights a serious, ongoing issue involving large-scale tax fraud. Additionally, there is a frustrating obstruction of a criminal investigation by a central government body, which raises significant concerns about accountability and transparency.
Meanwhile, the implications of such fraudulent activities extend far beyond mere monetary loss. Indeed, they actively undermine public trust in governmental institutions and tax systems.
Furthermore, the deliberate hindrance of this investigation directly impedes justice. Consequently, it allows those engaged in illicit practices to continue unchecked, thereby perpetuating a cycle of corruption affecting citizens and businesses alike.
Therefore, the need for rigorous enforcement and reform in regulatory frameworks is truly urgent. Ultimately, these systemic failures threaten to dismantle the pillars of economic stability.
Specifically, unknown persons fraudulently misused the complainant’s brother’s Permanent Account Number (PAN), GSWPS0850Q. Namely, they used it to open accounts and facilitate transactions totaling over Rs. 34 Crore. More precisely, the complainant alleges that more than 200 companies/firms participated in the massive scheme to evade taxes. Thus, this clearly reflects on the larger $35 Million PAN misuse issue. For reference on criminal proceedings, see the Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and the official Income Tax Department of India portal.
Key Grievance Filings and Status
| Grievance Registration Number | Date of Receipt | Received By Ministry/Department | Current Status | Officer Concerned |
| DOPAT/E/2025/0006987 | 26/07/2025 | Personnel and Training (>> CBI Investigation >> Allegation of Corruption) | Case Closed (Action Date: 04/10/2025) | Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary, UP Govt.) |
| PMOPG/E/2025/0044483 | 31/03/2025 | Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) | (Status not explicitly “closed,” but describes lack of breakthrough as of May 2025) | (Details of officer handling not provided in the excerpt) |
Export to Sheets
The Obstruction: Income Tax Department Non-Cooperation in $35 Million PAN Misuse
At present, the primary roadblock is the alleged procrastination and non-cooperation by the Income Tax Commissioner, Prayagraj (Aayakar Bhawan). Naturally, this has raised significant concerns among the investigative team.
In response, the team made repeated attempts to engage and request essential documentation. However, the consistent lack of response creates an atmosphere of frustration and delays in the overall process.
Consequently, this behavior severely hampers the progress of the investigation. Furthermore, it undermines public trust in the integrity of the tax administration.
In addition, it raises serious questions about the willingness of authorities to uphold their duties. Thus, it complicates matters further for all involved parties.
For context, the local police in Mirzapur (Kotwali Katra, then Ko. City) registered the FIR (FIR No. 291/23 under Sec 420 IPC and 66C/66D IT Act) on 11/11/2023. As provided under the Information Technology Act, 2000, provisions exist for cyber fraud offenses. Subsequently, Investigating Officers included Inspector Jitendra Kumar, Inspector Dhananjay Singh, and Sub Inspector Lallan Yadav, who repeatedly requested crucial details from the ITD regarding the $35 Million PAN incident:
- First, provide details on how many accounts were opened using PAN GSWPS0850Q.
- Second, state the name and address of the account holders who conducted the money transactions.
In response, the complainant asserts that the ITD is “running away from providing account details.” Moreover, this failure to monitor the misuse of PAN constitutes potential corruption. Therefore, he firmly believes it is a matter for a CBI investigation.
Current Resolution Status
Specifically, the complainant marked the resolution of DOPAT/E/2025/0006987 as “No” with the explicit reason: “Sent to other department without resolution,” thereby indicating the pervasive issue of a mishandled $35 Million PAN misuse.
Meanwhile, the Government of Uttar Pradesh (Chief Minister Secretariat), headed by Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary), officially received the grievance. Citizens can submit grievances via the CPGRAMS Portal. Ultimately, this step aims to apply state pressure on the ITD and police. However, the core issue of PAN misuse remains unresolved. Consequently, the investigation into the financial fraud still lacks a breakthrough.
Contact Details for Follow-up on Grievance DOPAT/E/2025/0006987 in $35 Million PAN Misuse
Officer Concerns To: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary) Organisation: Government of Uttar Pradesh (Chief Minister Secretariat) Contact Number: 05222226350 Email Address: arvind.12574[at]gov[dot]in
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.