🚨Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur: A Citizen’s Fight to Protect Government Land in Mirzapur

The Problem: Corruption and Evasion in Revenue Records

The public grievance portal is meant to be a direct channel for citizens to seek redressal. However, it is allegedly being misused to shirk official responsibility and protect corrupt elements. The case of Ashok Kumar Maurya from Mirzapur highlights a serious systemic flaw. This flaw involves the arbitrary closure of critical grievances. These grievances concern the illegal sale of government land and the ongoing fight for Public Land in Mirzapur. The fight for Public Land in Mirzapur is central to the challenges faced by citizens seeking justice through the grievance portal.

Maurya’s complaint details the manipulation of revenue records (Araji Nos. 175, 183, 191, and subsequently 164 K/Kh/A) that facilitated the unauthorized sale of public land by staff of Tehsil Sadar. The citizen’s objective is clear: the restoration of public land and strict action against the land mafia and complicit officials.

---

The Arbitrary Role of the Lekhpal

The core frustration lies in the response submitted by the subordinate official, the Lekhpal. (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

Misleading Claims and Distortion of Intent (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The Lekhpal’s report (आख्या) was used to close the initial grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0097027). It made a highly objectionable claim. The claim stated that the applicant merely “wants to include his name in the sold public land.”

• Citizen’s Refutation: This claim is a deliberate distortion of fact. Maurya is fighting for public interest—the protection of government assets—not for personal inclusion in an illegal transaction.
• Outcome: This false narrative successfully led to the arbitrary closure of the case. This allowed the alleged corruption to continue without investigation.

---

The Legal Duty vs. The Lekhpal’s Direction (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The second, and perhaps more critical, issue involves the Lekhpal’s legal standing and role concerning the hierarchy of revenue officers.

Who Are the Custodians of Public Land?

According to the legal framework, particularly the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, the primary custodians of public land in a Gram Panchayat are the senior district officials:

• The District Magistrate (DM)
• The Chief Revenue Officer (CRO)
• The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM)
• The Tehsildar

The Shifting of Legal Burden (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The UP Revenue Code places a statutory duty upon these custodians to protect public land. If record manipulation or illegal sale is discovered, they must take legal action. They are required to file a plaint before the competent court for correction under Section 32/38 of the Code.

However, the Lekhpal’s report repeatedly advises the aggrieved applicant to institute a case in this matter. This constitutes a severe administrative and legal inconsistency:

1. A subordinate official is directing a private citizen to undertake a duty that legally belongs to the senior custodian officers.
2. This action effectively attempts to shift the entire legal burden. It moves the responsibility of protecting public assets from the government to the private applicant.

This pattern suggests a systemic avoidance of responsibility that hinders justice and protects those responsible for the illegal transactions.

---

📢 Call for Immediate High-Level Action

To restore faith in the system and protect public assets, the appeal demands immediate intervention by the District Magistrate:

1. Direct Custodians to Act: The DM must instruct the custodians (CRO, SDM, Tehsildar) to act. They must stop advising citizens to file a case. They should immediately file a plaint under Section 32/38 of the UP Revenue Code. This action will correct records. It will also restore the public land.
2. Independent Inquiry: A high-level and independent committee is needed. It should exclude the current Tehsil Sadar staff. This committee must investigate the alleged corruption and illegal sale of Araji No. 164 bifurcating it into 164 K and 164 Kh.
3. Stop Bogus Reports: Strict directives are needed. They will ensure subordinates stop submitting misleading reports on the Jansunwai Portal. “This ensures that the appropriate senior authorities submit only detailed, truthful reports.”

This situation describes a serious case of alleged manipulation of official land records (Araji/Khasra numbers) by revenue staff. The Lekhpal is specifically involved in this case. This manipulation aims to facilitate the illegal sale of public/government land (Gram Panchayat land). Transferring the land to a second generation after the original purchasers’ demise complicates recovery. The process of recovery is further complicated.

Here is an analysis of the situation, focusing on the roles, the illegal act, and the resulting legal challenges:

---

1. 🧑‍💻 The Role of the Lekhpal and Land Records

The Lekhpal is the fundamental revenue official at the village level and is responsible for maintaining all primary land documents. (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

• Custody of Records: The Lekhpal maintains the Khatauni (Record of Rights) and the Khasra (Field Book). The Lekhpal must enter and report all changes in land ownership, use, and classification.
• The Act of Manipulation: The transformation of the original public land (Araji No. 164) into two parcels (Araji No. 164K and Araji No. 164KH) and the subsequent sale of Araji No. 164KH involved fraudulent changes in the Khatauni and Khasra. The Lekhpal could execute or initiate this manipulation. They were likely colluding with senior Tehsil staff and the powerful purchasers.

---

2. 🏛️ The Illegal Transaction and Public Land Status

The core illegality lies in the sale of land that was classified as public land.

• Public Land Definition: The government reserves land for public use. This includes areas like Nahar, Pukhta, Rasta, Khalihan, or Abadi land. The Gram Panchayat holds it. The Lekhpal or Tehsildar cannot transfer, lease, or sell it to private individuals without following the proper legal process. This process usually involves de-reservation or exchange as per the UP Revenue Code, 2006.
• Legal Void: A sale of public land based on manipulated records is void ab initio (void from the beginning). The purchasers—and subsequent inheritors—do not acquire any legal title because the seller (the government/Gram Panchayat) never lawfully transferred ownership.

---

3. 📉 Challenges Posed by Intergenerational Transfer (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The transfer of the illegally acquired land to the second generation introduces specific difficulties for the applicant, Ashok Kumar Maurya, and the State:

Aspect	Challenge for the State/Applicant
New Stakeholders	The restoration case must now be filed against multiple heirs of the original musclemen. This makes the litigation more complex. It is also more time-consuming.
Plea of Innocence	The second generation may claim they are bonafide purchasers/inheritors. They argue they were unaware of the original fraud. This claim complicates the summary eviction process.
Proof of Title	The State must meticulously track the fraudulent entries through the revenue records (mutations). They need to prove the land was public when it was initially sold. This must be done regardless of subsequent transfers.

---

4. ⚖️ The Required Legal Action (Focus on Custodians)

As you argued in your grievance, the responsibility for initiating action rests with the revenue custodians, not the aggrieved citizen. (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

• Action Mandated by Law: The concerned custodians (DM, CRO, SDM, Tehsildar) must immediately file a plaint before the competent court (usually the court of the Sub-Divisional Officer or Collector) seeking:
  • Correction of Records under Section 32/38 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006, declaring the sale entries void.
  • Eviction/Restoration of the land back to the Gram Panchayat.
• Need for Inquiry: Given the involvement of revenue staff in manipulating the records, a high-level administrative inquiry is necessary. This inquiry will punish the corrupt officials and prevent future occurrences.

🛑 The Deliberate Error: Misclassification

The Lekhpal aims to convert a criminal corruption case into a civil dispute. The situation portrays a dispute between two private parties or presents itself as a routine administrative task.

1. Avoiding the Term “Fraud” and “Illegal Sale”

• What the Lekhpal Calls It: A “correction” (सुधार). This implies the initial entry was a simple mistake (e.g., misspelling a name, wrong plot number in a deed).
• What It Actually Is: Fraudulent manipulation of the Khatauni (Record of Rights). People use it to convert public land into private property, followed by an illegal sale. This process involves deliberate, dishonest intent by revenue officials (Lekhpal and likely higher staff) for illegal personal gain.

2. Shifting Custodial Responsibility (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

• By calling it a “correction of the revenue record,” the Lekhpal implies that the appropriate action is a standard process. This process often takes a long time. It usually involves litigation filed by the applicant. It usually involves litigation filed by the applicant.
• This statement deliberately ignores the core fact: the land in question was public land (Gram Panchayat land). The responsibility to initiate action against fraudulent transactions involving public land rests solely with the custodians. These custodians include the DM, CRO, SDM, and Tehsildar. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 outlines this under Section 32/38.

---

💰 The Ulterior Motive: Loss to Public Exchequer (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The ulterior motive behind this deliberate error is threefold:

1. Protection of Corrupt Officials and Purchasers

The Lekhpal’s report acts as a shield. Treating the matter as a simple correction avoids triggering an independent, high-level inquiry. This inquiry would involve the entire chain of revenue officials, from the Lekhpal up to the Tehsil/SDM staff. These officials allowed the initial manipulation and subsequent sale of Araji No. 164KH. It protects the officials from criminal action and the “musclemen” from immediate eviction.

2. Causing Financial Loss to the State

• Direct Loss: The government (Public Exchequer) loses valuable land (Araji No. 164KH), which it could have used for public infrastructure, common facilities, or lawfully leased or managed for community benefit.
• Indirect Loss: The State incurs the cost of defending the subsequent civil litigation. The citizens initiated this litigation. The State defends these cases instead of prosecuting the fraud itself. The prolonged illegal occupation prevents the land from generating any revenue for the Gram Panchayat.

3. Discouraging Public Interest Litigation (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

The Lekhpal is forcing the original complainant, Ashok Kumar Maurya, to undertake complex, expensive, and lengthy litigation. This is against powerful individuals and the State machinery itself. This action attempts to discourage public interest grievances and preserve the corrupt status quo.

In summary, the Lekhpal’s statement claims the matter concerns only “correction”. This is a calculated attempt to mislead the higher authorities (like the DM/CM Secretariat). The goal is to downplay the seriousness of the fraud and ultimately validate the illegal transaction through inaction. (Fight for Public Land in Mirzapur)

To provide the most relevant web link for the Revenue Department concerning Mirzapur and Uttar Pradesh land records, here are the official portals:

1. Official Land Records Portal (Bhulekh) of Uttar Pradesh. This is the primary portal for viewing computerised land records. These include Khatauni and Record of Rights.
   • Link: https://upbhulekh.gov.in/
2. Jansunwai (Integrated Grievance Redressal System) Portal of Uttar Pradesh: This portal allows users to submit grievances. You can also use it for tracking grievances mentioned in your previous conversation. This includes those concerning the Revenue Department (DM, Tehsildar).
   • Link: http://jansunwai.up.nic.in/
3. Official Website of Mirzapur District:You might find specific local revenue announcements or contact details here.
   • Link: https://mirzapur.nic.in/