Table of contents
- Inquiry into Rs.861300 Loss: Water Testing Kits into Garbage Scandal in Mirzapur
- 1. The Discovery: Water Testing Kits into Garbage at City Block
- 2. A Tale of Two Screens: BDO’s Contradictory Stance on Discarded Kits
- 3. The “Ghost” Consultations: Fabricated Interaction Over Dumped Testing Equipment
- 4. The “Garage” Defence: Explaining Water Testing Kits into Garbage
- 5. Constitutional Duty and Public Accountability Regarding Trashed Testing Equipment
- 6. The Demand for a Transparent Inquiry into Water Testing Kits into Garbage
- Conclusion: Will Accountability be Fixed?
- 1. Primary Oversight Contacts (Lucknow) for the Waste Testing Kits Inquiry
- 2. Digital Escalation Links for Trashed Testing Equipment Complaints
- 3. Formal Steps to Challenge the Closed Report
- 4. Legal Intervention for Trashed Water Testing Kits
- Related Posts like Water Testing Kits into Garbage
Inquiry into Rs.861300 Loss: Water Testing Kits into Garbage Scandal in Mirzapur
In the heart of Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, a significant financial and administrative scandal has recently surfaced, involving the alleged waste of public funds amounting to Rs. 861,300. Consequently, an official inquiry into Rs.861300 Loss is now underway. Specifically, this issue—centered around the throwing of essential Water Testing Kits into Garbage heaps at the “City” Development Block—highlights a concerning trend of bureaucratic shifting of responsibility and a blatant disregard for transparency in public service.
For instance, activist Yogi M. P. Singh filed a grievance after discovering that multiparameter water quality testing kits—intended to ensure safe drinking water for 87 Gram Panchayats—were rotting in a garbage heap instead of being used to protect public health.
Key Takeaways
- A significant scandal in Mirzapur involves the loss of Rs. 861,300 due to Water Testing Kits into Garbage.
- Officials showed inconsistent responses, with the Block Development Officer denying responsibility while justifying the delays of Jal Nigam.
- The complainant alleges procedural fraud, claiming authorities never contacted him despite their report stating otherwise.
- Authorities attempted to explain the discarded kits with superficial justifications and contradictory statements about their management.
- A transparent inquiry is demanded to address the serious lapses in handling public health tools and ensure accountability in Mirzapur.
1. The Discovery: Water Testing Kits into Garbage at City Block
To begin with, the saga started with a report by the Samvad News Agency (published in Amar Ujala), which revealed a shocking visual: expensive medical-grade water testing kits thrown into garbage areas and strewn across the City Block office premises like common junk, consequently prompting an inquiry into the Rs. 861,300 loss.
Authorities have launched an inquiry into the loss of Rs. 861,300 regarding the undelivered kits intended for the State Drinking Water and Sanitation Mission and the Namami Gange project. Consequently, these kits, which empower women from Self-Help Groups (SHGs) to conduct water quality tests at the village level, have remained undistributed for over a year, resulting in significant financial implications for the public exchequer. (Inquiry into Rs.861300 Loss)
2. A Tale of Two Screens: BDO’s Contradictory Stance on Discarded Kits
Undoubtedly, one of the most frustrating aspects of this case is the “double-speak” that officials display in their responses. Indeed, the Block Development Officer (BDO) has taken a paradoxical position that actively undermines the integrity of the grievance redressal system:
- The Denial: On one hand, the BDO stated in the official report that the matter “does not concern him,” effectively washing his hands of any administrative responsibility for the items stored on his premises.
- The Justification: On the other hand, the official justified the actions of the Jal Nigam (Water Corporation), acting as a defense counsel for a separate department instead of serving as an impartial investigator.
Therefore, this situation raises a critical question: If the matter is not within the BDO’s jurisdiction, why is the BDO office providing justifications for the delay and mismanagement on behalf of Jal Nigam?
3. The “Ghost” Consultations: Fabricated Interaction Over Dumped Testing Equipment
In addition, the complainant, Yogi M. P. Singh, has raised a serious allegation of procedural fraud. Specifically, the official report submitted to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) implies that the authorities were in contact with the complainant regarding the inquiry into the financial loss.
However, the complainant asserts that no official has contacted him before or after the submission of the report. As a result, this “paper-only” resolution—where officials claim to have engaged with the citizen to satisfy the requirements of the PG portal—is a direct violation of the principles of natural justice. Ultimately, writing in a report that a conversation took place when it did not is not just negligence; it is a fabrication of official records.
4. The “Garage” Defence: Explaining Water Testing Kits into Garbage
Specifically, after the news broke and the activist registered a complaint (PMOPG/E/2025/0024538), the administration responded quickly; however, their response felt superficial. Indeed, the official remarks claim:
- First, all 87 Gram Panchayats received the distributed kits.
- Second, the team stored “leftover” kits in a garage.
- Finally, the team loaded the kits onto a vehicle for their return to Jal Nigam.
However, this explanation does not clarify why officials allowed these vital water testing kits to turn into garbage by leaving them in a “torn bundle” scattered for a year. If the kits were surplus, why did they not return them immediately? Moreover, why did it take a media report and a PMO grievance to initiate the “loading” of these kits? Therefore, the “garage” defence appears to be a reactive cleanup rather than a proactive management strategy.
5. Constitutional Duty and Public Accountability Regarding Trashed Testing Equipment
In response, the complainant has invoked Article 51A of the Constitution of India, which outlines the Fundamental Duties of citizens. Thus, by seeking an inquiry, the citizen is actively performing his duty to protect public property and abjure violence (including the “administrative violence” of wasting public funds).
Clearly, the loss of Rs. 861,300 is not merely a number; rather, it represents thousands of villagers denied the ability to test their water for contaminants. Furthermore, in a region where people spend money like water to provide clean drinking water, abandoning the tools meant to verify that purity represents an extraordinary dereliction of duty.
6. The Demand for a Transparent Inquiry into Water Testing Kits into Garbage
At present, the status of the grievance is marked as “Case Closed,” but the complainant still feels dissatisfied—and rightfully so. Consequently, you cannot consider a case “resolved” if:
- First, the primary accused party (the Block administration) investigates itself.
- Second, they never interview the complainant.
- Third, the financial loss is not recovered from the salaries of the negligent staff.
Therefore, the demand is clear: An impartial enquiry by an honest third-party official who is not part of the Mirzapur Block or the local Jal Nigam hierarchy. Furthermore, the “rarest of rare” negligence regarding public health infrastructure requires us to establish clear accountability. Ultimately, it’s essential to address such serious lapses to ensure the community’s safety and well-being.
Conclusion: Will Accountability be Fixed?
In summary, the Mirzapur scandal involving turning vital Water Testing Kits into Garbage serves as a litmus test for the Uttar Pradesh Government’s commitment to “Zero Tolerance” for corruption and negligence. Meanwhile, when people find kits in the trash, they aren’t just throwing away plastic and chemicals—they’re discarding the taxpayer’s trust.
Specifically, Shri Arvind Mohan is the Joint Secretary at the Chief Minister’s Secretariat. As a result, he now takes on the responsibility of looking beyond the “all is well” in his subordinates’ reports to uncover the reality of the garbage heap in the City Block.
Indeed, it appears you are looking for the specific contact channels and formal methods to escalate your complaint against the public authorities in Mirzapur. Since you consider the report from your closed grievance (PMOPG/E/2025/0024538) to be arbitrary and false, you must now transition from “Grievance” to “Appeal” or “High-Level Intervention.”
Accordingly, below is the structured contact information and the procedure to challenge the “Case Closed” status.
1. Primary Oversight Contacts (Lucknow) for the Waste Testing Kits Inquiry
Since the Block Development Officer (BDO) is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Rural Development and the Chief Minister’s Office, these are the authorities who can overrule the local report:
| Office / Name | Position | Email / Contact Details |
| Shri Arvind Mohan | Joint Secretary, CM Secretariat | arvind.12574@gov.in / 0522-2226350 |
| CM Helpline (UP) | Chief Minister’s Office | Dial 1076 (Toll-Free) |
| Rural Development Dept | ACS/Principal Secretary | sec-rd-up@nic.in |
| District Magistrate | DM Mirzapur | dm-mirzapur.up@nic.in / 05442-252320 |
2. Digital Escalation Links for Trashed Testing Equipment Complaints
To “stop” the current narrative of the local authorities, you must formally record your dissatisfaction through these web portals:
- CPGRAMS (Central Government):pgportal.gov.in
- Action: Log in and file an Appeal against the closed grievance number PMOPG/E/2025/0024538. State clearly that the “Officer contacted complainant” claim is a fabrication.
- Jansunwai (UP State):jansunwai.up.nic.in
- Action: File a fresh complaint specifically against the BDO for “Submission of False Evidence” and “Misleading the PMO.”
3. Formal Steps to Challenge the Closed Report
In order to ensure that the public authorities are held accountable for the Rs. 861,300 loss, follow this sequence:
A. The “Dissatisfaction” Feedback on Water Testing Kits into Garbage Case
On the PMOPG portal, ensure you have selected “Poor” rating and opted for the “Not Resolved” status. In the remarks, use the following legal phrasing:
“The report submitted by the BDO is factually incorrect and perjurious. Specifically, no contact was made with the complainant. Furthermore, the BDO is acting as a witness for Jal Nigam despite claiming no jurisdiction. Therefore, re-investigation by an external agency (SIT or Vigilance) is requested.”
B. RTI for Evidence Regarding Discarded Testing Equipment
Next, file an RTI to the Public Information Officer (PIO), Development Block City, Mirzapur asking for:
- First, the “Call Logs” or “Visitor Register” proof that they met or talked to you (as claimed in their report).
- Second, the “Stock Register” entry showing when the kits were received and why they were not distributed for 12 months.
- Finally, the “Movement Order” or “Letter” sent to Jal Nigam before the news was published.
4. Legal Intervention for Trashed Water Testing Kits
Finally, if the executive authorities continue to protect the BDO, you have the right to approach:
- UP Lokayukta: For investigating corruption and dereliction of duty by public servants.
- Allahabad High Court (PIL): Under Article 226, since this involves a large-scale loss of public money and a threat to public health (water testing). (Inquiry into Rs.861300 Loss)
Summary of Information for your Records on Discarded Water Kits
- Registration No: PMOPG/E/2025/0024538
- Estimated Public Loss: Rs. 861,300
- Key Violation: Dereliction of Duty & False Reporting.
In conclusion, would you like me to draft a formal “Notice of Appeal” that you can email directly to the Joint Secretary (Shri Arvind Mohan)?


Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.