Citizen Files RTI Appeal Against Mirzapur Health Directorate Over Delayed Response in the matter of Private Practice of Govt doctors

Mirzapur, UP – Citizen Yogi M P Singh filed an RTI appeal against the Medical and Health Directorate in Mirzapur, expressing his growing frustration with the lack of timely responses from the Directorate. He emphasized that the Directorate did not respond in a timely manner, adding that such delays could undermine the transparency and accountability that the Right to Information Act was designed to ensure.
His inquiry was specifically focused on the alleged private practice of government doctors, an issue that has become increasingly contentious in recent years. The issue of private practice by government doctors in question raised concerns due to the potential conflict of interest, as these individuals are expected to prioritize public service but may be tempted to profit from private patients.

The appeal was filed on December 25, 2024, marking a significant delay that further fueled Singh’s concerns regarding the efficacy of the government’s willingness to address such pressing matters. Singh claimed that this constituted a violation of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which is meant to empower citizens and hold public officials accountable for their actions.
By seeking clarity on these practices, Singh hopes to shed light on a system that requires greater scrutiny and to advocate for the rights of the citizens who rely on these government services.

The case highlights the role of the RTI Act. It is a tool for citizens to demand transparency, particularly concerning the private practice of Government doctors. It also ensures accountability from public authorities.

---

Case Details at a Glance

Here is a summary of the key details from the appeal and the original RTI application, which outlines the main concerns raised by the applicant and the specific information being sought. This includes a clear description of the context surrounding the request, the reasons for the appeal, and any relevant documentation that supports the case, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand and the expectations for resolution.

First Appeal Details (u/s 19(1)):

• Registration Number: DIRMH/A/2024/61119
• Date of Filing: 25/12/2024
• Grounds for Appeal: No Response Within the Time Limit

Original RTI Application Details (u/s 6(1)):

• Registration Number: DIRMH/R/2024/62190
• Date of Filing: 10/11/2024
• Status: RTI Request Received as on 10/11/2024

Parties Involved:

• Applicant: Yogi M P Singh
  • Address: Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, 231001
  • Mobile Number: +91-7379105911
  • Email: yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
• Public Authority: Medical and Health Directorate
• Public Information Officer (PIO) Approached:
  • Name/Designation: AD Mirzapur / JD
  • Phone No: 9515840539
  • Email Id: admhmzp1@gmail.com
• First Appellate Authority (FAA):
  • Name/Designation: AD Mirzapur / AD
  • Phone No: 8005192626
  • Email Id: admhmzp1@gmail.com

---

Grounds for Appeal: Violation of RTI Act Timeline

The primary reason for the appeal is the failure of the Public Information Officer (PIO) to fulfill their duties effectively.
The PIO did not give the requested information within the legally mandated timeframe, which is a significant breach of protocol.
This delay was particularly concerning as it related to the private practice of government doctors, a matter of public interest that affects many citizens who rely on transparency and accountability in healthcare services.
The lack of timely information not only hinders the public’s right to access information but also raises questions about the ethical practices of government officials who are expected to uphold the law.
Consequently, the failure of the PIO in this instance underscores the need for better training and adherence to transparency regulations in order to restore public trust in governmental operations.

The applicant filed the original RTI application on November 10, 2024. The PIO must give information according to $Section\ 7(1)$ of the RTI Act, 2005. They must do this within 30 days of receiving the request.

The appellant filed the appeal on December 25, 2024. By that time, they had waited a total of 45 days. The appellant states, “…one month 15 days passed… which is a mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Subject of the RTI: Private Practice by Government Doctors

Mr. Singh seeks information about a serious matter of public interest that has far-reaching implications for the healthcare system.
This concern revolves around the private practice of government doctors, particularly in private hospitals and nursing homes, which has raised significant ethical questions.
The appeal text suggests a potential conflict of interest, as it is alarming that the very same doctors may grant the licenses for these private establishments, thereby directly influencing the private practice of government doctors.
This situation not only undermines the integrity of the healthcare profession but also poses a risk to patient care, as financial incentives could interfere with the quality and accessibility of medical services.
Furthermore, this overlap may lead to public distrust in healthcare providers, as citizens may question whether medical decisions are being made in the best interest of patients or for personal financial gain.
The ramifications of these practices necessitate urgent examination and regulatory scrutiny to ensure that public health is not compromised.

The appellant expressed frustration, stating, “Think about the deep rooted corruption in the Department of Medical and Health. Even after a guilty verdict, the government doctor and the private nursing home avoid penalties according to the law.” Now, they evade providing information, implying that something is wrong with their dealings.

Relief Sought from the Appellate Authority about Private Practice of Govt doctors

In his appeal, Mr. Yogi M P Singh has made two specific requests to the First Appellate Authority:

1. To take disciplinary action against the Public Information Officer. The officer clearly violated $Section\ 7(1)$ of the RTI Act, 2005.
2. Direct the PIO to provide the complete information sought in the original RTI application (DIRMH/R/2024/62190). The appellant should receive this information without any further delay.

The matter now rests with the First Appellate Authority, AD Mirzapur. They need to adjudicate the appeal. Appropriate action should be taken about the private practice of Govt doctors.

Successful RTI Application: Yogi M P Singh

RTI portal of Uttar Pradesh could not send registration detail after transaction

CMO Mirzapur must provide information Concerning treatment of tuberculosis