A pending Compensation Case in PuVVNL involves a complex legal matter in which several customers have sought redress for service disruptions and dissatisfaction with billing practices. The case highlights the need for transparency and accountability from the utility service provider, as customers seek fair compensation for the inconveniences they face. As hearings progress, both sides present their arguments, and interim measures have been discussed. The outcome could set a precedent for future cases and redefine customer rights in the realm of utility services, emphasising the importance of reliable energy supply and equitable treatment of consumers.

Key takeaways from this blog post (Pending Compensation Case)

The blog post highlights a systemic failure within the Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (PuVVNL). Here are the key takeaways regarding the compensation delay for farmer Dayanand Singh:

  • A Four-Year Stalemate: Despite the crop burning incident occurring on April 18, 2021, the farmer has received no compensation, marking a 1,500-day delay that highlights a total breakdown in administrative accountability.
  • The “ERP” Discrepancy: While official records and e-office communications suggest that the budget was increased on the ERP system as of March 25, 2025, the funds have still not reached the victim, suggesting a bottleneck in the actual disbursement process.
  • Systemic Corruption Allegations: The persistent refusal to act on over 100 representations points to rampant corruption and a lack of a “logical approach” by the public authority.
  • Transparency via RTI: The current RTI (PUVNL/R/2025/60342) is a strategic attempt to force the PIO to reveal internal file notings and the specific reasons why a ₹40 Lakh demand made by the Executive Engineer remains unfulfilled.
  • Administrative Inertia: The case serves as a critique of modern digital governance; tools like “e-offices” and “ERP” are rendered useless if they are used to shuffle files rather than provide relief to citizens.

This situation is a poignant example of the “red tape” that often suffocates the rights of rural citizens. It is disheartening to see a farmer, who is the backbone of the economy, waiting over four years for compensation while administrative letters bounce between desks.

Here is a structured blog post based on the details of your RTI application and the ongoing struggle for justice.


Pending Compensation Case: The Four-Year Struggle of Farmers Against PuVVNL’s Administrative Apathy

For a farmer, a standing crop is not just a source of income; it is the culmination of months of sweat, credit, and hope. When that hope turns to ash due to technical negligence—specifically short circuits from poorly maintained electrical lines—the state has a moral and legal obligation to provide immediate relief. (Pending Compensation Case)

However, the case of Dayanand Singh (S/O Shobhnath Singh) and the persistent advocacy of Yogi M P Singh reveals a darker side of public service: a cycle of rampant corruption, systemic inefficiency, and a blatant disregard for the Right to Information (RTI).

1. The Incident: From Fertile Fields to Ash

The ordeal began on April 18, 2021. A wheat crop was destroyed due to a short circuit—a clear failure of the infrastructure managed by Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (PuVVNL). While the loss happened in an instant, the recovery of compensation has been stalled for over 1,500 days.

In rural India, such a delay isn’t just a “pending file”; it is a financial catastrophe that leads to debt traps and extreme mental agony for the farmer’s family.

2. The Paper Trail of Indifference

Despite more than a hundred representations, the public authority has failed to provide a logical or empathetic response. The details of the latest RTI (Registration Number: PUVNL/R/2025/60342) highlight a confusing maze of internal communications: (Pending Compensation Case)

  • The Budget Mystery: Records show that higher officials reportedly approved an increase in the budget on the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system as of March 25, 2025.
  • The Missing Link: If the authorities approved the budget and updated it on ERP, why hasn’t the payment reached the affected farmer?
  • The Execution Gap: Letters from the Electricity Distribution Division of Mirzapur (dated April and May 2025) seem to have disappeared into the “e-office” void without resulting in actual disbursements.

3. The Core Issue: Corruption or Incompetence?

The applicant, Yogi M P Singh, has raised a valid and stinging allegation: rampant corruption. When funds are “available” on digital platforms like ERP but “unavailable” for the actual claimant, it suggests a deliberate bottleneck. (Pending Compensation Case)

Public authorities often use the “unavailability of funds” excuse to avoid accountability. However, despite technical claims of increased budgets, the Executive Engineer remains unfulfilled in demanding ₹40 Lakh. The discrepancy highlights the crucial need for transparency under the RTI Act.

4. Analysis of the RTI Demands

The current RTI application seeks five critical points of information that PuVVNL must answer: (Pending Compensation Case)

  1. File Notings: What exactly did the officials write on the letters sent from the Mirzapur division?
  2. Action Taken Reports: Describe the physical steps taken to move money from the bank to the farmer, beyond simply “forwarding” a file.
  3. The ERP Paradox: If the system shows the budget is there, who is the “gatekeeper” preventing the release?
  4. Mechanism Transparency: How does the Director of Finance prioritise these demands? Is it based on urgency, or “other” informal factors?

5. The Human Cost of “Logistical Approaches”

The Public Information Officer (PIO), Suneel Kumar, and the Nodal Officer, Sandeep Kumar Verma, now sit at a crossroads. By law, they have 30 days to respond. However, the farmer’s life has been on hold for four years. (Pending Compensation Case)

Authorities often use the term “logistic approach” to give the impression that they are busy while not actually taking any action. A truly logical approach would recognise that a 2021 claim should be the highest priority in 2025. The right to a dignified livelihood.

6. Conclusion: A Call for Accountability

The case of PuVVNL vs. the Farmers of Mirzapur is a litmus test for the Uttar Pradesh power department. [If the “e-office” and “ERP systems” fail to guarantee compensation for a farmer regarding a fire that occurred four years ago, these digital tools reveal themselves as mere facades covering the same old systemic rot.] (Pending Compensation Case)

The demand is simple: No more letters. No more ERP updates. Just the compensation that is legally and ethically owed.


What Can You Do Next?

The RTI is a powerful weapon, but it often requires escalation to be effective. (Pending Compensation Case)

Based on your RTI application and the official records of Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (PuVVNL), here are the structured contact details for the concerned authorities.

1. Concerned RTI Officers (As per your Application) (Pending Compensation Case in PuVVNL)

These are the primary individuals responsible for providing the information you have sought regarding the ₹40 Lakh demand and the ERP budget status.

RoleNameDesignationMobile NumberEmail Address
PIOSuneel KumarExecutive Engineer (MM-I Discom)9453047248se.mm1@puvvnl.in
Nodal OfficerSandeep Kr. VermaNodal Officer (RTI)7906260442rti@puvvnl.in

2. Escalation & Monitoring Authorities (Mirzapur/Varanasi) (Pending Compensation Case in PuVVNL)

If the PIO does not respond within 30 days, these are the higher officials you may need to contact for your First Appeal or for administrative intervention.

Office/LevelNameDesignationMobileEmail
HQ (Accounts)S.K. MishraDGM (Accounts)9453047698
Mirzapur ZoneJ.P.N. SinghChief Engineer9450963509ce.mirzapur@puvvnl.in
EDC MirzapurRam DasSuperintending Engineer9415304000se.mirzapur@puvvnl.in
EDD-2 MirzapurM.K. SrivastavaExecutive Engineer9450963598ee.2mirzapur@puvvnl.in

3. Corporate Leadership (Varanasi Headquarters) (Pending Compensation Case in PuVVNL)

For matters concerning systemic corruption or the “unavailability of funds” at a Discom level, the Director of Finance is the final authority.

  • Managing Director (MD): Shambhu Kumar, IAS
    • Phone: 0542-2318437
    • Email: md@puvvnl.in / mdpurvanchalvvnl@gmail.com
  • Director (Finance): Santosh Kumar Jadia
    • Phone: 0542-2300117
    • Email: dirfin@puvvnl.in

5. Corporate Address (Pending Compensation Case in PuVVNL)

Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited

Vidyut Nagar, DLW, Bhikharipur,

PO-DRCO, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh — 221004


Would you like me to draft a formal letter of complaint addressed to the Director of Finance regarding the discrepancy between the “Increased ERP Budget” and the non-payment of the farmer’s compensation?

Home » Pending Compensation Case: Farmers vs Purvanchal Vidyut

One response to “Pending Compensation Case: Farmers vs Purvanchal Vidyut”

  1. Where is the claim of the government to be sympathizer of the farmers. Undoubtedly the truth is terrific. It reflects the insensitivity of the government to the farmers in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender, Anti-corruption Crusader & RTI Activist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading