Financial fraud in Uttar Pradesh has reached a critical stage; however, the police have failed to resolve the case in three years. Furthermore, this fraud now exceeds ₹50,00,00,000. It appears that cybercriminals and corrupt public officials in this country have formed a tacit understanding. Consequently, this prolonged inaction raises alarming questions about the integrity of law enforcement and public trust in the system.

Technology is evolving rapidly, and sophisticated cybercriminals now exploit vulnerabilities in the financial infrastructure. Consequently, this lack of accountability discourages victims from seeking justice; furthermore, it emboldens the perpetrators. Therefore, it is imperative that government authorities take stringent measures. Specifically, they must address these issues, restore faith in the judicial process, and ensure that they bring the responsible parties to justice promptly.

🚨 Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh: Unmasking a ₹37 Crore Fraud Case in India 🇮🇳

The misuse of a Permanent Account Number (PAN) constitutes a severe form of identity theft; consequently, it leads to devastating financial and legal consequences. In particular, the case of Mr. Yogi M. P. Singh
(PAN: GSWPS0850Q) from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, offers a stark and alarming example of this fraud
. Specifically, it involves alleged fraudulent transactions totaling a staggering ₹370 million (₹37 Crore). Moreover, this complex case spans multiple grievances lodged with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMOPG) and the Government of Uttar Pradesh (GOVUP). Furthermore, it effectively highlights critical issues in cybercrime investigation, inter-departmental coordination, and the security of personal financial identifiers.

---

🔍 The Allegations: A Timeline of Misuse

The core of the grievance, filed on March 30, 2025, with the PMO, revolves around fraudulent transactions
that were carried out by misusing Mr. Singh’s PAN. Moreover, the complainant explicitly states that the fraudulent practice continues today, which further underscores the extreme urgency of the matter. (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

Financial Transactions Under Scrutiny

The Income Tax Department’s notices, issued under Section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, not only detail several transactions attributed to Mr. Singh’s PAN but also highlight his claims that these transactions are indeed fraudulent:

• Financial Year 2021-22 (Assessment Year 2022-23): Notices from June 2023 and March 2025 highlight a massive rent payment of ₹1,27,01,673. Furthermore, the corresponding Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) reached approximately ₹3.4 crore; this suggests that the total transaction value significantly exceeds the reported rent.
• Diverse Transactions: Other records linked to the PAN include ₹613 from lottery winnings, ₹5,70,407 in business expenses, ₹19,071 in off-market debits, ₹10,63,414 in business receipts, and a GST turnover of ₹25,44,342.

Because these transactions vary so drastically—ranging from small lottery winnings to substantial business receipts—they strongly indicate that cybercriminals compromised the complainant’s identity. Consequently, these criminals likely used his credentials to mask various illicit financial activities.

---

🏢 Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh: Unverified Sources of Income

Crucially, the grievance details two specific companies named as the ‘paying body’ or ‘information source’ for attributed rent payments. The complainant disputes these claims entirely. Furthermore, this inclusion of specific details provides concrete leads for investigation:

1. CAREFUSION DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (PTLC11579B)

• Attributed Amount (Rent): ₹7,76,850
• CIN: U72200CH2004PTC027506
• Registered at: RoC-Chandigarh
• Address: DLF I T PARK, TOWER D, LEVEL2, KISHANGARH CHANDIGARH CH IN 160101

2. MEGACOSM COGNITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (DELM30192B)

• Attributed Amount (Rent): ₹3,10,683
• CIN: U52609DL2016PTC301680
• Registered at: RoC-Delhi
• Address: 57, Kalu Sarai, Begumpur Malviya Nagar New Delhi South Delhi DL IN 110017

The Taxpayer Information Summary lists these companies as the source of rent payments. However, the complainant strongly asserts these transactions are fraudulent. This situation implies that either the companies manipulated their records or they incorrectly reported payments against his PAN. Consequently, the Registrar of Companies (RoC-Chandigarh and RoC-Delhi) must verify these entries immediately.

---

👮 Legal and Administrative Quagmire

The complainant’s repeated attempts to seek redress have led to a tangled web of official complaints and limited progress on the ground:

A. The Role of the Police

Kotwali Katra Police Station in Mirzapur registered a First Information Report (FIR), M.A.S. No. 291/2023, on November 11, 2023. This FIR cites Section 420 (Cheating) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 66C/66D of the Information Technology (IT) Act.

• Status: The police reported the investigation as “under progress” for one year and five months, yet they have uncovered nothing.
• Closure Remark (GOVUP/E/2025/0024633): The Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a closure report on March 27, 2025. While this report acknowledged the FIR, it failed to detail any substantive investigative findings. It merely stated that a report was received from the police station and that officials inspected the documents. Consequently, the complainant marked the case as “Not Resolved.”

The complainant now urges the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to accelerate the investigation. He specifically requests that they obtain documents from Income Tax Officer Sonal Singh regarding the accounts used to deposit the ₹3.4 crore TDS into the government treasury. This evidence remains vital for tracing the true beneficiaries of these fraudulent transactions.ng the true beneficiaries of the fraudulent transactions. (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

B. Income Tax Department’s Internal Inquiry

The grievances reveal a critical internal inquiry within the Income Tax Department’s Intelligence and Criminal Investigation (I&CI) Wing:

• Initial Action: Priyanka Durbey, Addl. Director of Income Tax TPS-II, communicated on December 15, 2023, that the department was conducting inquiries “in respect of the persons who have claimed HRA by using the PAN of the petitioner.”
• Transfer of Case: The department subsequently transferred the case from the ITO(I&CI) Allahabad to the ITO(I&CI) Lucknow to ensure a coordinated inquiry.
• Assurance: The officer assured the petitioner that the department would not issue further notices to Sh. MP Yogi Singh until they completed the relevant inquiries. The CPGRAM matter was then treated as settled and closed based on this assurance. (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

However, the complainant’s later grievance (PMOPG/E/2025/0043877) reveals that ITO Sonal Singh began streaming new notices again in March 2025. This action contradicts the earlier assurance. Therefore, it suggests a significant disconnect between the different wings of the Income Tax Department or an escalation of the underlying fraudulent activity.nt activity.

---

⚖️ The Path Forward: Directives for a Resolution

The lack of decisive action, despite the registration of an FIR, suggests a failure in coordination between the police and the income tax authorities. To resolve this case, authorities must take the following steps: (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

1. Police Investigation and Financial Trace

The Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, must formally requisition the following documents from the Income Tax Department’s I&CI Wing (specifically, ITO Sonal Singh):

• Source Bank Accounts: These accounts reveal where the perpetrators deposited the ₹3.4 crore TDS. This evidence remains the most vital tool for identifying the true beneficiaries. (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)
• Complete Annual Information Report (AIR): These documents provide critical transaction details, including associated contact information like the mobile number 7024188072 and email dngoldraipur18@gmail.com.

2. Corporate Verification (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

The Registrar of Companies (RoC-Chandigarh and RoC-Delhi) must verify the transactions reported by CAREFUSION DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED and MEGACOSM COGNITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED against the complainant’s PAN. This verification will confirm if the fraudulent activity originates from the companies’ end or through a third-party intermediary.

3. Inter-Departmental Coordination

A high-level joint meeting between the Mirzapur Police and the I&CI Wing of the Income Tax Department is essential. The Joint Secretary concerned in the UP Chief Minister Secretariat, Shri Arvind Mohan, should mandate this meeting to synchronize the criminal investigation with the financial one. (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

---

📢 Conclusion: A Call for Digital Security (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

The case of Mr. Yogi M. P. Singh serves as a stark wake-up call regarding the vulnerability of the PAN as a primary financial identifier. While the government digitizes transactions, the mechanisms to prevent and rapidly address the fraudulent misuse of foundational IDs—such as PAN, Aadhaar, and DIN—must become more robust.

The complainant has diligently provided all necessary corporate details and financial figures; now, the onus rests on State and Central agencies to utilize their resources effectively. The police must prioritize criminal tracing, while the Income Tax Department must ensure financial accountability to unmask the syndicate behind this colossal ₹37 crore cyber fraud. Ultimately, justice for the complainant hinges on the immediate and coordinated action of these authorities.

To assist with your investigation and correspondence, here are the official websites and contact points for the relevant authorities:

1. Ministry of Corporate Affairs (Registrar of Companies) (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs administers corporate regulation through its regional offices. You can access their portal and find regional office details here:

• Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Portal
• Registrar of Companies, Chandigarh (Jurisdiction: Punjab, Chandigarh, and Himachal Pradesh)
• Registrar of Companies, Delhi (Jurisdiction: Delhi and Haryana)

2. Uttar Pradesh Police (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

For matters concerning the FIR and police investigation, you can use the following official portals:

• Official Website of Uttar Pradesh Police
• UP Government Grievance Portal (Jansunwai)
• Contact List of UP Police Units/Officials

3. Income Tax Department (Financial Fraud in Uttar Pradesh)

For matters regarding tax notices, PAN misuse, and internal inquiries:

• Official Income Tax Department Portal
• Contact & Helpline Directory (Includes specific helplines for e-filing, tax demands, and AIS/TIS grievances)
• TDS CPC Website (For queries related to TDS statements and Form 26AS)

Would you like me to find the contact details for the Registrar of Companies for Chandigarh or Delhi for further investigation?