Recent medical complaints in Bhadohi highlight a government doctor’s private practice, which consequently raises significant questions regarding professional ethics and accountability. For the first time, readers can learn more through detailed investigation results on medical complaints in this region. Over the past few months, numerous patients have shared their experiences of negligence and inappropriate conduct during consultations. Furthermore, these findings reveal a concerning trend: patients felt pressured to pay exorbitant fees for subpar services, which ultimately eroded their trust in the local healthcare system.

Furthermore, the investigation uncovered a lack of proper medical documentation and transparent billing, which further complicated patient care. Consequently, as the community demands answers, this situation underscores an urgent need for stricter regulations. Authorities must increase oversight of healthcare providers to ensure patients receive high-quality care without exploitation.

📜 Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints: An Analysis of the Medical Health Department’s Action on a Private Practice Allegation

This post offers a structured breakdown and analysis. Specifically, it details the correspondence by the Office of the Additional Director of Medical Health and Family Welfare, which is located in Vindhyachal Division, Mirzapur. Furthermore, it elaborates on the actions of the Chief Medical Officer, Bhadohi, concerning a Right to Information (RTI) inquiry. The query, filed by Shri Yogi M.P. Singh, sought information related to an official’s alleged private practice, thereby leading to a complex exchange between multiple government bodies.

---

1. The Genesis of the Inquiry: RTI and Commission Directives

The entire sequence of events began, consequently, with a directive from a higher authority, which, in turn, a formal information query initiated.

The Applicant and the Authority

Shri Yogi M.P. Singh, son of Shri Rajendra Pratap Singh and a resident of Surekapuram Colony, Mirzapur, sought the information. Specifically, his inquiry pertained to an earlier complaint made by Shri Jaichandra Maurya regarding Dr. Pradeep Kumar (also known as Dr. P.K. Yadav), who is a Physician at Maharaja Chet Singh District Hospital, Gyanpur, Bhadohi.

Compliance and Direction (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

The Hon’ble Uttar Pradesh Information Commission, Lucknow, issued a notice (Notice number 202503509N100250, Case number S09/A/0451/2025, dated 26.03.2025) that necessitated this process. Consequently, the Additional Director of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Vindhyachal Division, Mirzapur, directed the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Bhadohi to provide point-wise information. This directive (Letter No.: A.N./V.M./Jan Suvidha/2024-25/1632 dated 27.03.2025) emphasized urgency because the Commission had fixed a hearing date of 02.04.2025.

---

2. The Bhadohi CMO’s Response: Addressing the Five Points

The Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Bhadohi, promptly and efficiently responded (Letter No.: Jan Soochna / Nista0 / 2024-25/1911 dated 28.03.2025) to the Additional Director; consequently, he provided specific answers to the five points of information sought by Shri Yogi M.P. Singh. (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

Point No.	Summary of Information Sought (Implied)	CMO Bhadohi’s Response	Key Attachment/Reference
Point 1	Details about the investigation conducted on the complaint.	An investigation team (Dr. J.C. Saroj and Dr. Arvind Kumar Maurya) was constituted, and their investigation report is enclosed.	Investigation Report dated 18.11.2023
Point 2	Details about any challenge made against the investigation report.	No challenge was made by any party to any higher authority against the investigation report.	N/A
Point 3	Details of action taken against the concerned official (Dr. Pradeep Kumar).	Correspondence was made to the Director General, Medical and Health Services, UP, Lucknow for action against Dr. Pradeep Kumar.	CMO Letter No. 512 dated 31.01.2024
Point 4	Further details related to Point 3.	The required information is already contained in the attachment (CMO Letter No. 512 dated 31.01.2024).	CMO Letter No. 512 dated 31.01.2024
Point 5	Unspecified; likely action taken at the highest level.	The matter is not within the jurisdiction of the undersigned (CMO Bhadohi).	N/A

---

3. The Core Allegation and Investigation Findings (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

The most critical part of this correspondence is, without a doubt, the investigation report itself. Moreover, a subsequent letter to the Director General confirmed the initial allegations.

The Investigation Report (Dated 18.11.2023)

• Complainant: Shri Jaichandra Maurya, a resident of Mirzapur district; furthermore, he expresses his concerns regarding the issue at hand.
• Official Investigated: Dr. Pradeep Kumar (Physician) at Maharaja Chet Singh District Hospital, Gyanpur, Bhadohi. Consequently, the investigation has revealed several key findings.
• The Allegation: Specifically, it is alleged that Dr. Pradeep Kumar engaged in private practice. (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

Findings and Conclusion The investigation team visited Chhotelal Bind Hospital, Baraut, Prayagraj, on 11.11.2023 at 7:15 PM. Staff members there orally confirmed that when patients arrived to see Dr. Pradeep Kumar, they contacted him by telephone. He then attended to those patients in OPD room number 05. Consequently, the report explicitly states: “The allegation leveled by Shri Jaichandra Maurya… against Dr. Pradeep Kumar that he is doing private practice is true as per the oral statement of the staff there.”

The Demand for Action (CMO Letter No. 512 dated 31.01.2024) (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

Following the internal report, the CMO of Bhadohi formally requested action from the Director General of Medical and Health Services, UP, Lucknow. While the letter confirms that Dr. P.K. Yadav practices at Chhote Lal Bind Hospital, the CMO noted a significant obstacle: the hospital falls under the jurisdiction of the CMO of Prayagraj. Furthermore, the doctor and the Chief Medical Superintendent of the District Hospital in Bhadohi did not cooperate during the investigation. Therefore, the CMO requested that the Director General initiate necessary disciplinary action.

4. The Final Communication to the Applicant

The loop was formally closed by the Additional Director, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Vindhyachal Division, Mirzapur (Letter No.: A.N./V.M./Public Information/2024-25/1640 dated 28.03.2025 29).

• The Action: The Additional Director attached the entire point-wise response from the Chief Medical Officer, Bhadohi, (Letter No.: Jan Soochna/Nista0/2024-25/1911) along with all its attachments, and sent it to the original RTI applicant, Shri Yogi M.P. Singh. (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)
• Simultaneous Notification: A copy of this final communication was also sent to the Hon’ble Uttar Pradesh Information Commission, Lucknow. This ensures compliance with the first directive and confirms the closure and provision of information.

5. Conclusion: A Case of Bureaucratic Compliance and Confirmed Allegation (Detailed Investigation Results on Medical Complaints)

The provided documents illustrate the clear administrative process of responding to a directive from the Information Commission. The Additional Director of Mirzapur and the CMO of Bhadohi responded promptly to the request.

Their Actions and Findings Their actions show due compliance with both the Right to Information Act and the Commission’s notice. Crucially, the investigative process confirmed the original complaint. Although the investigation encountered non-cooperation from the accused party, it ultimately concluded that the allegation of private practice against the medical officer was true.

Next Steps Consequently, the relevant authorities reviewed the matter at the Director General’s level for potential disciplinary action. This review acknowledged that the specific hospital location fell beyond the functional jurisdiction of the district CMO. Therefore, the process now moves toward higher-level administrative accountability.

Not every public authority in Bhadohi has shown the same level of compliance. For a contrasting example from the block development office, read BDO Bhadohi & RTI Provisions: A Case Study.

---

Would you like me to summarize the key findings of the investigation report (dated 18.11.2023) in a concise bulleted list?