Introduction CBI & Income Tax Corruption

Currently, the user is raising a serious and complex concern. Specifically, it involves the alleged misuse of their Permanent Account Number (PAN: GSWPS0850Q). Furthermore, this misuse has unfortunately led to reported fraudulent transactions amounting to a staggering $ ext{Rs. 34,38,77,662}$. Ultimately, these allegations highlight broader issues of CBI & Income Tax Corruption that affect many individuals.

Key Takeaways

• First, it highlights key institutional failures.
• In particular, the complainant, Yogi M. P. Singh, claims he suffers harassment while authorities dismiss his grievances as resolved despite ongoing issues.
• Additionally, the article outlines a breakdown in inter-agency cooperation and the need for judicial intervention to compel action against the perpetrators.
• Moreover, significant failures within the banking sector and the reluctance of officials to cooperate exacerbate the problem, thereby prolongingfraud related to the complainant’s PAN.

Consequently, this alarming situation highlights potential vulnerabilities in the financial system. Furthermore, it underscores the need for immediate scrutiny and action against large-scale tax evasion.
In addition, the implications of such misuse extend beyond financial losses, potentially affecting the user’s creditworthiness and personal financial security.
As a result, as the user navigates this troubling scenario, regulatory authorities need to take prompt measures. Specifically, they must investigate and rectify any discrepancies associated with this case. Therefore, this ensures that we serve justice and prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.

---

🚨 Analysis of the Grievance and Allegations (CBI & Income Tax Corruption)

To begin with, the complaint provides a detailed account of alleged failures. Indeed, these failures occur across multiple government departments. Ultimately, they concern a specific case of cyberfraud and tax evasion.

Key Allegations and Facts Stated by the Complainant:

• PAN Misuse: The complainant, Yogi M. P. Singh claims that cyber criminals are fraudulently misusing his PAN (GSWPS0850Q). They use it for business transactions and tax evasion, totaling Rs. 34,38,77,662.

Income Tax Department (ITD) Involvement/Failure:

• Specifically, the ITD system contains aTaxpayer Information Summary (TIS) showing significant transactions (e.g., GST turnover of $text{Rs. 25,44,342}$ and Business receipts of $\text{Rs. 10,63,414}$) connected to the PAN, despite the complainant never having filed a return or conducted such business.
• However, the ITD reported thatbank account details concerning PAN $text{GSWPS0850Q}$ are “not available” in one instance, whereas they provided a report earlier containing “bank accounts details retrieved from the system” in a previous grievance closure. As a result, this creates a clear contradiction.
• Meanwhile, ITD officer Sonal Singh (ITO, DDIT/ADIT, I&CI) allegedly requests the applicant’s property details. Furthermore, this request warns that a fine of Rs. 500 will be imposed for each day of non-compliance.
• Consequently, the ITD closed three tax evasion petitions and the PMO grievances, stating that they have “settled” the matter. However, the complainant asserts that the issue remains unresolved, claiming this is due to“Harassment by official.”

Law Enforcement and Agency Failures:

• For instance, the complainant cites a failure by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which is the premier investigating agency. Specifically, the CBI has not curbed corruption within the ITD. Thus, he suggests this failure allowsfraud and tax evasion to continue.
• Meanwhile, thePolice of the Government of Uttar Pradesh (Mirzapur District) are investigating an FIR (No. 291/2023 under Section 420 IPC and 66C, 66D IT Act). However, the complainant claims the ITD is not cooperating bydenying the bank details to the police.
• Banking Sector Failure: In addition, the transaction of over $ ext{Rs. 34}$ crores shows the banking sector’s failure. Indeed, it allowed such massive business transactions possibly without proper Know Your Customer (KYC). Consequently, there may not be genuine bank accounts connected to the real PAN holder.

---

🏛️ Agency Mandates and Jurisdiction (CBI & Income Tax Corruption)

Agency	Primary Mandate Relevant to Complaint	Complainant’s Stated Issue
CBI (CBI & Income Tax Corruption)	Investigate corruption cases concerning Central Government employees and departments (e.g., ITD).	Failed to curb corruption in ITD; reluctant to take action against corrupt IT officers.
Income Tax Department	Administration of Direct Taxes; detecting and preventing tax evasion.	Failure to investigate the genuine tax evasion complaint and instead allegedly harassing the real PAN holder.
Uttar Pradesh Police	Investigation of criminal cases within the state’s jurisdiction (e.g., FIR for cyber fraud and forgery).	Investigation is stalled because the ITD is allegedly withholding critical bank account details.
PMO/Public Grievance	Redressal of public grievances and ensuring accountability of government departments.	Grievance redressal has failed; the complaint was closed despite the core issue remaining unresolved.

---

✍️ Conclusion and Recommended Course of Action (CBI & Income Tax Corruption)

In summary, the narrative points to abreakdown in inter-agency cooperation and alleged corruption within the ITD. Consequently, it is either facilitating a major instance of cyber fraud andtax evasion or failing to adequately investigate it.

The CBI’s primary mandate

1. Refile Complaint to CBI: To begin with, the CBI’s primary mandate is to investigate corruption in central government departments. Therefore, the complainant should formally resubmit a detailed complaint to the CBI Director. Specifically, the complaint must detail corruption by ITD officials. Furthermore, it should mention obstruction of justice by individuals such as Sonal Singh and the ITD office in Prayagraj/Bangalore. For instance, allegations include the purported withholding of evidence, such as bank details, from the state police. Additionally, the complainant should note instances of harassment by the ITD officials.
2. Judicial Intervention: On the other hand, the administrative grievances have been officially closed, whilethe police investigation is ongoing. Therefore, the most effective next step would be to approach the High Court with a writ petition. Specifically, this can compel the ITD to provide thebank details to the investigating police officer. Moreover, it can request a court-monitored CBI enquiry into the entire fraud, including the conduct of the ITD officers.

Obligation and Liabilities of the Central Bureau of Investigation

As a result,Corruption in the Department of Income Tax continues. Consequently, large-scaletax evasion is occurring due to this corruption. In turn, the agency failed to fulfill its own responsibilities because the notice was issued on the basis of the records without proper verification.

Furthermore, the Department of Income Tax is not cooperating with the police, even though the police are actively investigating the cyberfraud concerning the misuse of the permanent account number.

Similarly, staff of Income Tax lack proper records for GSWPS0850Q. However, they nevertheless have the power to stream incometax notices to the PAN holder.

Indeed, this is the regime of our great, honest Prime Minister Narendra Damodar Das Modi, Sir. Notably, he is known as the embodiment of honesty. Consequently, both corrupt individuals and corruption itself ran away from his shadow.

Meanwhile, the Central Bureau ofInvestigation is responsible for curbing corruption in Central Departments. In fact, it is the most credible agency of this country, and it is widely known as the country’s premier investigating agency.

For instance, transactions of Rs. 343877662 made using the applicant’s PAN are a significant issue. Specifically, it highlights the failures of the Department of Income Tax, the Ministry of Finance, and especially the banking sector. Moreover, it points to a failure of the police of thegovernment of Uttar Pradesh.

PAN Misuse Description (CBI & Income Tax Corruption)

First, some significantinformation available with the Income Tax Department includes the following: Business receipts amount to Rs 4,65,76,920; GST purchases total Rs 12,20,99,234; GST turnover is Rs 16,32,92,127; and Rent received equals Rs 1,19,09,381, leading to a Total amount of Rs. 34,38,77,662.
Specifically, transactions of Rs. 34,38,77,662 occurred because someonemisused the applicant’s PAN. Consequently, this is thefailure of the Department of Income Tax, Ministry of Finance. In particular, itconcerns the banking sector and police of the Government of Uttar Pradesh.
Furthermore, much more information accompanies the grievance. Specifically, it shows mypermanent account number is being misused by fraudulent elements to evade tax.
Therefore, please direct CBI to take action againstcorrupts of income tax.

Income Tax Closed Door Preference Dealings

Dear Sir/Madam, the ticket raised is specifically about tax evasion. However, this issue does not relate to the processing of the returns filed. Instead, please share the information on the http://www.incometax.gov.in Home Page for submitting a tax evasion petition or filing a complaint about benami property holdings. Therefore, we consider this grievance closed and disposed of from the DGIT system.

In addition, it is noticeable that the applicant is not a taxpayer because he somehow manages two square meals for his family. Specifically, the applicant is ananti-corruption crusader and a social worker. Consequently, a question arises: Is the Department of Income Tax accountable to thepublic grievance portal and the Prime Minister portal? Do they actuallyredress the grievances of the common people in this largest democracy in the world?

Income Tax Avoiding Processing on PM Portal

To illustrate, why should the Department ofIncome Tax, Government of India, undergo scrutiny by the Prime Minister’s Office? Naturally, it must have accountable staff monitoring the redress ofgrievances on the public grievance portal of the Government of India. However, the result of investigations done by the Department of Income Tax is very poor. For instance, the office of theDepartment of Income Tax considered my three representations as tax evasion petitions. Subsequently, they forwarded these petitions to its Chandigarh office, Prayagraj office, and Lucknow office. Unfortunately, the result of thesetax evasion petitions remained zero. Thus, the question remains whether you have takenaction against the fraudulent elements.

Furthermore, the Department of Income Tax does not effectively tackle tax evasion. Primarily, this is due to rampant corruption within the department. Consequently, there is notransparency and accountability in the working of the Department of Income Tax of India. Meanwhile, theCentral Bureau of Investigation is reluctant to take action against the corruptincome tax officers.

Given these facts, why haven’t you provided the bank account details for the PAN GSWPS0850Q, which cybercriminals are fraudulently misusing? Therefore, please forward this matter to ITO Sonal Singh.

Related Post like CBI & Income Tax Corruption

• CBI Investigation in Tax Fraud: Key Developments
• CBI Investigation Demanded in PAN Identity Theft Case
• Income Tax Grievance: Exploring Corruption Allegations
• 54 Crore Identity Theft & CBI Investigation Explained
• CBI Tax Evasion & Corruption in India Explained